An examination of opportunities and risks to private forest planning efforts among Connecticut private forest owners

IF 2.7 Q1 FORESTRY
Ava A. Smith , Chadwick D. Rittenhouse , Eleanor Shoreman-Ouimet , Thomas E. Worthley
{"title":"An examination of opportunities and risks to private forest planning efforts among Connecticut private forest owners","authors":"Ava A. Smith ,&nbsp;Chadwick D. Rittenhouse ,&nbsp;Eleanor Shoreman-Ouimet ,&nbsp;Thomas E. Worthley","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Private landowners own 56 % of forest lands in the United States, yet only 11 % of forest landowners have a management plan despite the ability of a plan to help establish goals and actions to promote forest stewardship. We conducted a web-based survey targeting private forest owners in Connecticut to understand the motivations and barriers to participating in a management planning process and paired the results with economic and environmental targets spatially. Landowners without plans differed from plan holders by gender identity and average parcel size, in addition to being less familiar with educational programs, and having personal priorities that did not include harvesting timber. Our findings indicate that barriers still inhibit engaged owners from seeking out and obtaining plans, supporting the notion that financial incentives associated with planning are less of a driver for active stewardship than alignment with landowner priorities. Survey results informed the development of forest opportunity and risk zones that incorporated social, economic, and environmental variables.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001444/pdfft?md5=a559957d785334b0ee29e7309799fc00&pid=1-s2.0-S2666719324001444-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Private landowners own 56 % of forest lands in the United States, yet only 11 % of forest landowners have a management plan despite the ability of a plan to help establish goals and actions to promote forest stewardship. We conducted a web-based survey targeting private forest owners in Connecticut to understand the motivations and barriers to participating in a management planning process and paired the results with economic and environmental targets spatially. Landowners without plans differed from plan holders by gender identity and average parcel size, in addition to being less familiar with educational programs, and having personal priorities that did not include harvesting timber. Our findings indicate that barriers still inhibit engaged owners from seeking out and obtaining plans, supporting the notion that financial incentives associated with planning are less of a driver for active stewardship than alignment with landowner priorities. Survey results informed the development of forest opportunity and risk zones that incorporated social, economic, and environmental variables.

康涅狄格州私人森林所有者在私人森林规划工作中面临的机遇和风险研究
在美国,私人土地所有者拥有 56% 的林地,但只有 11% 的林地所有者制定了管理规划,尽管规划能够帮助制定目标和行动,促进森林管理。我们针对康涅狄格州的私人林地所有者开展了一项网络调查,以了解他们参与管理规划过程的动机和障碍,并将调查结果与经济和环境目标进行空间配对。没有规划的土地所有者与有规划的土地所有者在性别认同和平均地块大小方面存在差异,此外,他们对教育计划也不太了解,而且个人的优先事项不包括采伐木材。我们的调查结果表明,各种障碍仍然阻碍着参与其中的所有者寻找并获得规划,这也支持了这样一种观点,即与规划相关的经济激励不如与土地所有者的优先事项相一致更能推动积极的管理。调查结果为结合社会、经济和环境变量制定森林机遇区和风险区提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信