Techno-economic assessment of supercritical, cold liquid, and dissolved CO2 injection into sub-seafloor basalt

Heather Norton , Philipp Gillessen , Curran Crawford
{"title":"Techno-economic assessment of supercritical, cold liquid, and dissolved CO2 injection into sub-seafloor basalt","authors":"Heather Norton ,&nbsp;Philipp Gillessen ,&nbsp;Curran Crawford","doi":"10.1016/j.ccst.2024.100236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Injecting CO<sub>2</sub> into subsea basalt can provide permanent storage via multiple trapping mechanisms, including mineralization reactions which convert the CO<sub>2</sub> into solid carbonates over time. Injecting CO<sub>2</sub> together with water can accelerate the process of mineralization, but presents additional challenges, such as high energy and water requirements. A techno-economic model of CO<sub>2</sub> transport and injection into ocean basalt was developed to compare injection strategies using pure supercritical CO<sub>2</sub>, pure liquid CO<sub>2</sub>, and CO<sub>2</sub> dissolved in seawater. The model was applied to a representative injection site off the coast of British Columbia, Canada. Injection of CO<sub>2</sub> dissolved into seawater was found to be more energy and cost intensive than injection of supercritical or liquid CO<sub>2</sub>; this is primarily due to the reduced quantities of CO<sub>2</sub> that can be injected into each well, and additional pumping energy required for the accompanying seawater. For the base assumptions, transport and storage costs for supercritical, liquid, and dissolved injection were estimated as $43/t, $38/t, and $250/t respectively. Their energy requirements were estimated as 93 kWh/t, 90 kWh/t, and 213 kWh/t respectively. The current best estimates of geological parameters for ocean basalt suggest good injectivity and very large storage capacities per well. This may help to compensate for the additional project expenses incurred by deep water, allowing cost-effective liquid and supercritical injection. However, this result is sensitive to high uncertainties in both geological parameters and component cost data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9387,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Capture Science & Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772656824000484/pdfft?md5=230133100a135e38caef398b3f8b1c26&pid=1-s2.0-S2772656824000484-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Capture Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772656824000484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Injecting CO2 into subsea basalt can provide permanent storage via multiple trapping mechanisms, including mineralization reactions which convert the CO2 into solid carbonates over time. Injecting CO2 together with water can accelerate the process of mineralization, but presents additional challenges, such as high energy and water requirements. A techno-economic model of CO2 transport and injection into ocean basalt was developed to compare injection strategies using pure supercritical CO2, pure liquid CO2, and CO2 dissolved in seawater. The model was applied to a representative injection site off the coast of British Columbia, Canada. Injection of CO2 dissolved into seawater was found to be more energy and cost intensive than injection of supercritical or liquid CO2; this is primarily due to the reduced quantities of CO2 that can be injected into each well, and additional pumping energy required for the accompanying seawater. For the base assumptions, transport and storage costs for supercritical, liquid, and dissolved injection were estimated as $43/t, $38/t, and $250/t respectively. Their energy requirements were estimated as 93 kWh/t, 90 kWh/t, and 213 kWh/t respectively. The current best estimates of geological parameters for ocean basalt suggest good injectivity and very large storage capacities per well. This may help to compensate for the additional project expenses incurred by deep water, allowing cost-effective liquid and supercritical injection. However, this result is sensitive to high uncertainties in both geological parameters and component cost data.

向海底玄武岩注入超临界、冷液体和溶解二氧化碳的技术经济评估
向海底玄武岩注入二氧化碳可以通过多种捕获机制提供永久封存,包括矿化反应,随着时间的推移将二氧化碳转化为固体碳酸盐。将二氧化碳与水一起注入可加速矿化过程,但也带来了额外的挑战,如高能耗和高用水需求。为了比较使用纯超临界二氧化碳、纯液态二氧化碳和溶解在海水中的二氧化碳的注入策略,我们开发了一个将二氧化碳输送和注入海洋玄武岩的技术经济模型。该模型应用于加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省沿海一个具有代表性的注入地点。结果发现,与注入超临界二氧化碳或液态二氧化碳相比,注入溶解在海水中的二氧化碳需要更多的能源和成本;这主要是由于每口井可注入的二氧化碳数量减少,以及伴随的海水需要额外的泵送能源。根据基本假设,超临界、液态和溶解注入的运输和储存成本估计分别为 43 美元/吨、38 美元/吨和 250 美元/吨。其能源需求估计分别为 93 kWh/t、90 kWh/t 和 213 kWh/t。目前对海洋玄武岩地质参数的最佳估算表明,每口井具有良好的注入能力和巨大的储存能力。这可能有助于补偿深水所产生的额外项目费用,使液体和超临界注入具有成本效益。然而,这一结果对地质参数和组件成本数据的高度不确定性非常敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信