Prediction of lamb survival using machine learning algorithms with neonatal lamb behaviors and maternal behavior score in Kivircik lambs

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
{"title":"Prediction of lamb survival using machine learning algorithms with neonatal lamb behaviors and maternal behavior score in Kivircik lambs","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jveb.2024.06.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aims of this study were to examine the relationship between lamb and ewe behaviors in postnatal 3-hour and lamb survival using machine learning (ML) algorithms and to determine the best ML classifier to predict lamb survival. The research data consisted of postnatal 3-hour behavior records of 43 Kivircik ewes and their 65 lambs, along with preweaning survival information of lambs. The prediction of lamb survival was performed on three datasets containing different features using decision tree, support vector machine (SVM), multilayer perceptron, logistic regression, random forest (RF), K-nearest neighbors, and boosting (B) ML algorithms. The accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score values of the RF algorithm were 0.931, and the area under curve value was 0.966 for dataset 1, which included parity of dam, birth type and sex of lamb, and birth weight predictors, as well as postnatal lamb and ewe behaviors as features. In dataset 2, which includes principal component scores instead of lamb and ewe behaviors, the RF approach made classification with an accuracy of 0.909. In dataset 3, which includes the maternal behavior score as a feature, the RF and SVM algorithms showed similar performance (0.909 accuracy). These results indicate that, by using lamb and ewe behaviors in the postnatal 3-hour with ML methods, it is possible to classify lambs as either surviving or dying before weaning with high accuracy. In addition, it was determined that the ML algorithm that best adapted to the current study data was the RF classifier.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17567,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558787824000522","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aims of this study were to examine the relationship between lamb and ewe behaviors in postnatal 3-hour and lamb survival using machine learning (ML) algorithms and to determine the best ML classifier to predict lamb survival. The research data consisted of postnatal 3-hour behavior records of 43 Kivircik ewes and their 65 lambs, along with preweaning survival information of lambs. The prediction of lamb survival was performed on three datasets containing different features using decision tree, support vector machine (SVM), multilayer perceptron, logistic regression, random forest (RF), K-nearest neighbors, and boosting (B) ML algorithms. The accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score values of the RF algorithm were 0.931, and the area under curve value was 0.966 for dataset 1, which included parity of dam, birth type and sex of lamb, and birth weight predictors, as well as postnatal lamb and ewe behaviors as features. In dataset 2, which includes principal component scores instead of lamb and ewe behaviors, the RF approach made classification with an accuracy of 0.909. In dataset 3, which includes the maternal behavior score as a feature, the RF and SVM algorithms showed similar performance (0.909 accuracy). These results indicate that, by using lamb and ewe behaviors in the postnatal 3-hour with ML methods, it is possible to classify lambs as either surviving or dying before weaning with high accuracy. In addition, it was determined that the ML algorithm that best adapted to the current study data was the RF classifier.

利用机器学习算法和基维西克羔羊的新生羔羊行为及母体行为评分预测羔羊存活率
本研究的目的是利用机器学习(ML)算法研究羔羊和母羊产后 3 小时行为与羔羊存活率之间的关系,并确定预测羔羊存活率的最佳 ML 分类器。研究数据包括 43 只基维西克母羊及其 65 只羔羊的产后 3 小时行为记录,以及羔羊断奶前的存活率信息。使用决策树、支持向量机(SVM)、多层感知器、逻辑回归、随机森林(RF)、K-近邻和提升(B)ML 算法对包含不同特征的三个数据集进行了羔羊存活率预测。数据集 1 包括母羊的奇偶性、羔羊的出生类型和性别、出生体重预测因子以及产后羔羊和母羊的行为特征,RF 算法的准确度、精确度、召回率和 F1 得分值均为 0.931,曲线下面积值为 0.966。在数据集 2 中,主成分得分代替了羔羊和母羊行为,射频方法的分类准确率为 0.909。在数据集 3 中,母羊行为得分是一个特征,RF 算法和 SVM 算法表现相似(准确率为 0.909)。这些结果表明,通过使用羔羊和母羊在出生后 3 小时内的行为与 ML 方法,可以高精度地将羔羊分类为断奶前存活或死亡。此外,还确定了最适合当前研究数据的 ML 算法是射频分类器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
325 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research is an international journal that focuses on all aspects of veterinary behavioral medicine, with a particular emphasis on clinical applications and research. Articles cover such topics as basic research involving normal signaling or social behaviors, welfare and/or housing issues, molecular or quantitative genetics, and applied behavioral issues (eg, working dogs) that may have implications for clinical interest or assessment. JVEB is the official journal of the Australian Veterinary Behaviour Interest Group, the British Veterinary Behaviour Association, Gesellschaft fr Tierverhaltensmedizin und Therapie, the International Working Dog Breeding Association, the Pet Professional Guild, the Association Veterinaire Suisse pour la Medecine Comportementale, and The American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信