The development of a sustainable climate resilience building framework for Southern Zimbabwe

Rameck Defe, Mark Matsa, Veronica Makuvaro
{"title":"The development of a sustainable climate resilience building framework for Southern Zimbabwe","authors":"Rameck Defe,&nbsp;Mark Matsa,&nbsp;Veronica Makuvaro","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2024.100163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Resilience building has increasingly been embraced as a framework for managing climate change and variability induced disaster. The study sought to develop a Sustainable Climate Resilience Building framework for managing climate change adversities in Mwenezi District of Southern Zimbabwe. A mixed method approach which utilized both qualitative and quantitative techniques was used. The choice of two approaches was based on a phenomenological constructivist belief that problems are best solved using multiple sources. The qualitative approach depended on questionnaires, interviews, focus group discussions and direct field observations. The quantitative approach depended on closed ended questions and use of statistical package for social scientists (SPSS version 25.0) for data analysis. Qualitative data was subjected to content analysis. The findings obtained revealed that Non-Governmental Organizations and Government Departments have collaborated and initiated resilience interventions to manage climate change impacts. Some of the interventions implemented can be categorized as crop production and livestock production interventions. However there are some challenges obtained hindering communities’ capacity to build resilience these are namely, ignorance, lack of technical know-how and lack of financial resources to buy resilient inputs on the side of communities. Based on the findings, a Sustainable Climate Resilience Building framework was developed to manage climate change adversities. The researchers recommend communities to adopt a Sustainable Climate Resilience Building framework. This is because the framework provides a pathway for building community resilience to effectively manage climate change adversities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411524000545/pdfft?md5=c94c741abb6a4b2626e43a49f1895bca&pid=1-s2.0-S2772411524000545-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature-Based Solutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411524000545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Resilience building has increasingly been embraced as a framework for managing climate change and variability induced disaster. The study sought to develop a Sustainable Climate Resilience Building framework for managing climate change adversities in Mwenezi District of Southern Zimbabwe. A mixed method approach which utilized both qualitative and quantitative techniques was used. The choice of two approaches was based on a phenomenological constructivist belief that problems are best solved using multiple sources. The qualitative approach depended on questionnaires, interviews, focus group discussions and direct field observations. The quantitative approach depended on closed ended questions and use of statistical package for social scientists (SPSS version 25.0) for data analysis. Qualitative data was subjected to content analysis. The findings obtained revealed that Non-Governmental Organizations and Government Departments have collaborated and initiated resilience interventions to manage climate change impacts. Some of the interventions implemented can be categorized as crop production and livestock production interventions. However there are some challenges obtained hindering communities’ capacity to build resilience these are namely, ignorance, lack of technical know-how and lack of financial resources to buy resilient inputs on the side of communities. Based on the findings, a Sustainable Climate Resilience Building framework was developed to manage climate change adversities. The researchers recommend communities to adopt a Sustainable Climate Resilience Building framework. This is because the framework provides a pathway for building community resilience to effectively manage climate change adversities.

为津巴布韦南部制定可持续气候复原力建设框架
抗灾能力建设日益被视为管理气候变化和变异性灾害的框架。这项研究旨在制定一个可持续的气候复原力建设框架,以管理津巴布韦南部姆韦内齐地区的气候变化逆境。研究采用了定性和定量相结合的混合方法。选择这两种方法是基于现象学建构主义的信念,即解决问题的最佳方法是利用多种来源。定性方法依赖于问卷调查、访谈、焦点小组讨论和直接实地观察。定量方法采用封闭式问题,并使用社会科学家统计软件包(SPSS 25.0 版)进行数据分析。对定性数据进行了内容分析。研究结果表明,非政府组织和政府部门已经开展合作,并启动了复原力干预措施,以管理气候变化的影响。其中一些干预措施可归类为作物生产和畜牧生产干预措施。然而,一些挑战阻碍了社区建设复原力的能力,这些挑战包括无知、缺乏技术诀窍以及社区缺乏购买复原力投入的财政资源。根据研究结果,制定了一个可持续气候复原力建设框架,以应对气候变化带来的不利影响。研究人员建议社区采用可持续气候复原力建设框架。这是因为该框架提供了建设社区抗灾能力的途径,以有效管理气候变化带来的不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信