Nadia Frontier , Joseph Marlow , Adriana Giles , Simon A. Morley , Melody S. Clark , Lloyd S. Peck
{"title":"Growth and ecophysiology of two Antarctic benthic predators; Isotealia antarctica and Urticinopsis antarctica.","authors":"Nadia Frontier , Joseph Marlow , Adriana Giles , Simon A. Morley , Melody S. Clark , Lloyd S. Peck","doi":"10.1016/j.jembe.2024.152045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is a dearth of basic life history and physiological data from Southern Ocean species, particularly from benthic vagile predators. This is an important data gap because species inhabiting the Southern Ocean live in a more temperature stable but seasonally varying environment than temperate and tropical counterparts. For many species living below 0 °C for a significant proportion of the year, bodily functions are slowed to disproportionately lower rates than would be predicted by temperature alone. Certain life history and physiological processes are often aligned with the short summer season of productivity. However, predators may behave differently because they are decoupled from the phytoplankton bloom and some have been shown to exhibit less seasonal physiological change. To further our understanding of Antarctic predator growth and seasonal ecophysiology, field growth rates were measured for two soft-bodied Antarctic anemone benthic predators, <em>Isotealia antarctica</em> and <em>Urticinopsis antarctica,</em> using <em>in situ</em> sampling of anemones on uniquely marked tiles. <em>Ex situ</em> measurements of oxygen consumption and seven-day faecal output were obtained from recently collected specimens in aquaria and compared between summer and winter. Winter physiological data for Antarctic species are rare, and we tested the hypothesis that generalist feeders or predators continue to feed during the winter. Growth rates differed between species and between years. <em>I. antarctica</em> and <em>U. antarctica</em> both exhibited overall positive field growth rates across a 15 month period between 2020 and 2021; with <em>U. antarctica</em> increasing 199.80% (± SE 25.8) in mass compared to a 16.85% (± SE 8.9) increase in <em>I. antarctica</em>. There was no significant difference in <em>I. antarctica</em>'<em>s</em> growth between 15 and 25 months field deployment. After 25 months, <em>I. antarctica</em> showed an average 7.96% (± SE 8.05) increase in buoyant weight. <em>Ex situ</em> oxygen consumption and faecal egestion did not differ seasonally, which, demonstrates that anemones fed at similar rates during the winter and summer. In contrast to some members of the Antarctica benthos, <em>I. antarctica</em> and <em>U. antarctica</em> actively feed all year round, whereas several other species have been reported to enter a state of torpor in winter.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology","volume":"579 ","pages":"Article 152045"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022098124000601/pdfft?md5=bd51213e294a1f4fd01de319e9850b7f&pid=1-s2.0-S0022098124000601-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022098124000601","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is a dearth of basic life history and physiological data from Southern Ocean species, particularly from benthic vagile predators. This is an important data gap because species inhabiting the Southern Ocean live in a more temperature stable but seasonally varying environment than temperate and tropical counterparts. For many species living below 0 °C for a significant proportion of the year, bodily functions are slowed to disproportionately lower rates than would be predicted by temperature alone. Certain life history and physiological processes are often aligned with the short summer season of productivity. However, predators may behave differently because they are decoupled from the phytoplankton bloom and some have been shown to exhibit less seasonal physiological change. To further our understanding of Antarctic predator growth and seasonal ecophysiology, field growth rates were measured for two soft-bodied Antarctic anemone benthic predators, Isotealia antarctica and Urticinopsis antarctica, using in situ sampling of anemones on uniquely marked tiles. Ex situ measurements of oxygen consumption and seven-day faecal output were obtained from recently collected specimens in aquaria and compared between summer and winter. Winter physiological data for Antarctic species are rare, and we tested the hypothesis that generalist feeders or predators continue to feed during the winter. Growth rates differed between species and between years. I. antarctica and U. antarctica both exhibited overall positive field growth rates across a 15 month period between 2020 and 2021; with U. antarctica increasing 199.80% (± SE 25.8) in mass compared to a 16.85% (± SE 8.9) increase in I. antarctica. There was no significant difference in I. antarctica's growth between 15 and 25 months field deployment. After 25 months, I. antarctica showed an average 7.96% (± SE 8.05) increase in buoyant weight. Ex situ oxygen consumption and faecal egestion did not differ seasonally, which, demonstrates that anemones fed at similar rates during the winter and summer. In contrast to some members of the Antarctica benthos, I. antarctica and U. antarctica actively feed all year round, whereas several other species have been reported to enter a state of torpor in winter.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology provides a forum for experimental ecological research on marine organisms in relation to their environment. Topic areas include studies that focus on biochemistry, physiology, behavior, genetics, and ecological theory. The main emphasis of the Journal lies in hypothesis driven experimental work, both from the laboratory and the field. Natural experiments or descriptive studies that elucidate fundamental ecological processes are welcome. Submissions should have a broad ecological framework beyond the specific study organism or geographic region.
Short communications that highlight emerging issues and exciting discoveries within five printed pages will receive a rapid turnaround. Papers describing important new analytical, computational, experimental and theoretical techniques and methods are encouraged and will be highlighted as Methodological Advances. We welcome proposals for Review Papers synthesizing a specific field within marine ecology. Finally, the journal aims to publish Special Issues at regular intervals synthesizing a particular field of marine science. All printed papers undergo a peer review process before being accepted and will receive a first decision within three months.