Knowledge management and higher education institute: Review & topic analysis

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Piyush Vyas
{"title":"Knowledge management and higher education institute: Review & topic analysis","authors":"Piyush Vyas","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Analyzing the effects of knowledge management in higher education is challenging because of various aspects of tasks such as teaching effectiveness, administrative services, and research communications. Employees' job performance is crucial in higher education institutions in order to disseminate innovations, knowledge, and collaboration. Thus, studying the relationship between knowledge management practices and job performance is essential. Therefore, this literature review and topic analysis aims to provide a concept-driven approach for synthesizing and analyzing numerous available literature bases. Collected journal articles and conference papers were scrutinized based on this research work's above-mentioned aim. Finally, 41 relevant papers have been studied in this work. The presented work advances the understanding of the role of knowledge management processes in higher education institutions in increasing job performance. Findings suggest that individual, national, and professional teams, language issues, and trust can impact knowledge-sharing practices and job performance of higher education institutes' employees.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853124001434/pdfft?md5=f106a16c8c7292afeb7561799932cc0f&pid=1-s2.0-S2199853124001434-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853124001434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Analyzing the effects of knowledge management in higher education is challenging because of various aspects of tasks such as teaching effectiveness, administrative services, and research communications. Employees' job performance is crucial in higher education institutions in order to disseminate innovations, knowledge, and collaboration. Thus, studying the relationship between knowledge management practices and job performance is essential. Therefore, this literature review and topic analysis aims to provide a concept-driven approach for synthesizing and analyzing numerous available literature bases. Collected journal articles and conference papers were scrutinized based on this research work's above-mentioned aim. Finally, 41 relevant papers have been studied in this work. The presented work advances the understanding of the role of knowledge management processes in higher education institutions in increasing job performance. Findings suggest that individual, national, and professional teams, language issues, and trust can impact knowledge-sharing practices and job performance of higher education institutes' employees.

知识管理与高等教育机构:回顾与主题分析
分析知识管理在高等教育中的效果具有挑战性,因为它涉及教学效果、行政服务和研究交流等多方面的任务。在高等教育机构中,为了传播创新、知识和合作,员工的工作绩效至关重要。因此,研究知识管理实践与工作绩效之间的关系至关重要。因此,本文献综述和主题分析旨在提供一种概念驱动的方法,以综合和分析现有的大量文献资料。根据上述研究目的,对收集到的期刊论文和会议论文进行了仔细研究。最后,本研究工作对 41 篇相关论文进行了研究。本研究报告加深了人们对高等院校知识管理过程在提高工作绩效方面的作用的理解。研究结果表明,个人、国家和专业团队、语言问题和信任会影响高等教育机构员工的知识共享实践和工作绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
196
审稿时长
1 day
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信