{"title":"The fetal anomaly screening scan: an international perspective","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ogrm.2024.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fetal structural anomalies, affecting up to 3% of pregnancies, can be a major concern for expectant parents. Ultrasound screening has become an essential part of prenatal care, offering early detection of birth defects and empowering parents with information for reproductive decision making. While first-trimester scans are becoming more informative, the second-trimester scan remains the cornerstone of anomaly detection. Technological advancements, and the use of additional tools like MRI, are further enhancing our ability to ensure a healthy outcome for both mother and baby. Advancements have enabled detection of around half of all major anomalies in the first trimester (11–13+6) weeks. Professional societies recommend the second-trimester anatomy scan (18–22 weeks) as the gold standard for anomaly detection. The fetal anomaly scan boasts a high detection rate for major structural malformations, ranging from 15% to exceeding 90% in some cases. Detection rates vary depending on the organ system being examined. Equipment settings and sonographer experience play a role in accuracy. Whilst not 100% effective, the scan is safe and valuable. It empowers informed decision-making and can improve some pregnancy outcomes by enabling early detection and management. This allows for interventions, planning for delivery at the right time and place, and emotional preparation for parents. However, it is crucial to understand the limitations of the scan and the possibility of false positives or missed anomalies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":53410,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751721424000782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Fetal structural anomalies, affecting up to 3% of pregnancies, can be a major concern for expectant parents. Ultrasound screening has become an essential part of prenatal care, offering early detection of birth defects and empowering parents with information for reproductive decision making. While first-trimester scans are becoming more informative, the second-trimester scan remains the cornerstone of anomaly detection. Technological advancements, and the use of additional tools like MRI, are further enhancing our ability to ensure a healthy outcome for both mother and baby. Advancements have enabled detection of around half of all major anomalies in the first trimester (11–13+6) weeks. Professional societies recommend the second-trimester anatomy scan (18–22 weeks) as the gold standard for anomaly detection. The fetal anomaly scan boasts a high detection rate for major structural malformations, ranging from 15% to exceeding 90% in some cases. Detection rates vary depending on the organ system being examined. Equipment settings and sonographer experience play a role in accuracy. Whilst not 100% effective, the scan is safe and valuable. It empowers informed decision-making and can improve some pregnancy outcomes by enabling early detection and management. This allows for interventions, planning for delivery at the right time and place, and emotional preparation for parents. However, it is crucial to understand the limitations of the scan and the possibility of false positives or missed anomalies.
期刊介绍:
Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine is an authoritative and comprehensive resource that provides all obstetricians, gynaecologists and specialists in reproductive medicine with up-to-date reviews on all aspects of obstetrics and gynaecology. Over a 3-year cycle of 36 issues, the emphasis of the journal is on the clear and concise presentation of information of direct clinical relevance to specialists in the field and candidates studying for MRCOG Part II. Each issue contains review articles on obstetric and gynaecological topics. The journal is invaluable for obstetricians, gynaecologists and reproductive medicine specialists, in their role as trainers of MRCOG candidates and in keeping up to date across the broad span of the subject area.