Exploration of Low-Income Household Food Waste Reduction Awareness, Practices, and Education Needs

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
{"title":"Exploration of Low-Income Household Food Waste Reduction Awareness, Practices, and Education Needs","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The average U.S. household wastes one-third of the food it buys; however, levels of waste differ by household size and socioeconomic status. There is limited research on understanding low-income household food waste practices and effective food waste reduction education and messaging.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Explore the perspectives of household food waste reduction awareness, attitudes, barriers, motivators, and practices among federally funded nutrition education program participants in California.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>The qualitative study utilized Zoom-recorded focus groups with participants from 6 counties in California. Participants were at least 18 years old, had one or more children, prepared most meals for their household, spoke English/Spanish, and were able to participate in online group discussions.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Six focus groups (5 in Spanish and 1 in English) were conducted with a total of 46 participants. Researchers performed a thematic analysis of responses to 10 open-ended questions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants were most aware of food waste occurring at home, schools, and restaurants. The types of food most likely to be thrown away were fruits and vegetables, inedible parts of meat, grains, and leftovers. Wasted food was typically placed in the trash. Leftover foods when saved were stored, used for a new meal, frozen, or given to others. The top barriers to reducing household food waste were related to excess purchases, children's food preferences, food expiring quickly, and not following a shopping list. participants also highlighted guilt around food waste related to the unwise use of money or other people needing more food. Saving money and family autonomy were top motivators to reduce household food waste. Participants preferred monthly or weekly in-person classes, videos, or printed materials to reduce food waste at home.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Federal nutrition education programming that emphasizes planning, shopping, cooking, food storage, and managing excess food, has the potential to decrease household food waste. Additionally, it may help participants save money while helping mitigate environmental impacts.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>ReFED</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624001222","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The average U.S. household wastes one-third of the food it buys; however, levels of waste differ by household size and socioeconomic status. There is limited research on understanding low-income household food waste practices and effective food waste reduction education and messaging.

Objective

Explore the perspectives of household food waste reduction awareness, attitudes, barriers, motivators, and practices among federally funded nutrition education program participants in California.

Study Design, Settings, Participants

The qualitative study utilized Zoom-recorded focus groups with participants from 6 counties in California. Participants were at least 18 years old, had one or more children, prepared most meals for their household, spoke English/Spanish, and were able to participate in online group discussions.

Measurable Outcome/Analysis

Six focus groups (5 in Spanish and 1 in English) were conducted with a total of 46 participants. Researchers performed a thematic analysis of responses to 10 open-ended questions.

Results

Participants were most aware of food waste occurring at home, schools, and restaurants. The types of food most likely to be thrown away were fruits and vegetables, inedible parts of meat, grains, and leftovers. Wasted food was typically placed in the trash. Leftover foods when saved were stored, used for a new meal, frozen, or given to others. The top barriers to reducing household food waste were related to excess purchases, children's food preferences, food expiring quickly, and not following a shopping list. participants also highlighted guilt around food waste related to the unwise use of money or other people needing more food. Saving money and family autonomy were top motivators to reduce household food waste. Participants preferred monthly or weekly in-person classes, videos, or printed materials to reduce food waste at home.

Conclusions

Federal nutrition education programming that emphasizes planning, shopping, cooking, food storage, and managing excess food, has the potential to decrease household food waste. Additionally, it may help participants save money while helping mitigate environmental impacts.

Funding

ReFED

探索低收入家庭减少食物垃圾的意识、做法和教育需求
背景美国家庭平均浪费三分之一的食物,但浪费程度因家庭规模和社会经济地位而异。研究设计、环境、参与者这项定性研究利用 Zoom 录制的焦点小组,参与者来自加利福尼亚州的 6 个县。参与者至少年满 18 周岁,有一个或多个孩子,为家庭准备大部分膳食,会讲英语/西班牙语,并能够参与在线小组讨论。可衡量的结果/分析共开展了六个焦点小组(5 个西班牙语小组和 1 个英语小组),共有 46 名参与者。研究人员对 10 个开放式问题的回答进行了主题分析。结果参与者最了解家庭、学校和餐馆的食物浪费情况。最有可能被扔掉的食物类型是水果和蔬菜、肉类的不可食用部分、谷物和剩菜。浪费掉的食物通常会被扔进垃圾桶。剩饭剩菜则被储存起来,用于新的一餐、冷冻或送给他人。减少家庭食物浪费的最大障碍与过度购买、孩子的食物偏好、食物过期过快以及不按购物清单购物有关。参与者还强调了与不明智使用金钱或其他人需要更多食物有关的食物浪费的负罪感。省钱和家庭自主是减少家庭食物浪费的最大动力。结论联邦营养教育计划强调计划、购物、烹饪、食物储存和管理多余食物,有可能减少家庭食物浪费。此外,它还可以帮助参与者节省开支,同时帮助减轻对环境的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas. The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信