Comparison of parasitological methods for the identification of soil-transmitted helminths, including Strongyloides stercoralis, in a regional reference laboratory in northwestern Argentina: An observational study

IF 2 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Elvia Nieves , Pedro Fleitas , Marisa Juárez , Cristina Almazán , Gabriela Flores , Jimena Alani , Ramón Diaz , Jorge Martos , Pamela Cajal , Rubén Cimino , Alejandro Krolewiecki
{"title":"Comparison of parasitological methods for the identification of soil-transmitted helminths, including Strongyloides stercoralis, in a regional reference laboratory in northwestern Argentina: An observational study","authors":"Elvia Nieves ,&nbsp;Pedro Fleitas ,&nbsp;Marisa Juárez ,&nbsp;Cristina Almazán ,&nbsp;Gabriela Flores ,&nbsp;Jimena Alani ,&nbsp;Ramón Diaz ,&nbsp;Jorge Martos ,&nbsp;Pamela Cajal ,&nbsp;Rubén Cimino ,&nbsp;Alejandro Krolewiecki","doi":"10.1016/j.parepi.2024.e00370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Soil-transmitted helminths (STH) are a significant public health problem in impoverished communities of tropical and subtropical areas. Improved diagnostic methods are crucial for Neglected Tropical Diseases programs, particularly for <em>S. stercoralis</em>, as traditional methods are inadequate. Thus, it is important to identify the most accurate and efficient methods for the diagnosis of STH. We performed a retrospective study analyzing laboratory data at the Instituto de Investigaciones de Enfermedades Tropicales from 2010 to 2019. The study included data from outpatients referred for stool analysis and public health interventions from urban and rural communities in northern Salta province, Argentina. Samples were included in this analysis if processed through sedimentation/concentration, Baermann, Harada-Mori and McMaster's, with a subgroup that also included Agar plate culture method (APC). Sensitivity was calculated against a composite reference standard. Of the 5625 samples collected, 944 qualified for this analysis, with a prevalence of 11.14% for <em>A. lumbricoides</em>, 8.16% for hookworm, 1.38% for <em>T. trichiura</em>, and 6.36% for <em>S. stercoralis</em>. The sedimentation/concentration method was the most sensitive for <em>A. lumbricoides</em> (96%), compared to the McMaster method, with a sensitivity of 62%. Similarly, for hookworms, sedimentation/concentration was more sensitive than McMaster's, Harada-Mori, and Baermann with sensitivities of 87%, 70%, 43%, and 13%, respectively. Most of these infections were of light intensity. For <em>S. stercoralis</em>, Baermann and sedimentation/concentration methods were the most sensitive, with 70% and 62% respectively, while Harada-Mori was the least sensitive. In a subset of 389 samples also analyzed by the APC, Baermann was more sensitive than APC for detecting <em>S. stercoralis</em>, and both methods were superior to Harada-Mori. Parasitological methods, mostly when used combined, offer adequate opportunities for the diagnosis of STH in clinical and public health laboratories. The incorporation of <em>S. stercoralis</em> into the control strategies of the World Health Organization requires rethinking the current diagnostic approach used for surveys. With sedimentation/concentration and Baermann appearing as the most sensitive methods for this species. Further studies, including implementation assessments, should help in identifying the most adequate and feasible all-STH diagnostic approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37873,"journal":{"name":"Parasite Epidemiology and Control","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article e00370"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405673124000345/pdfft?md5=d2c1c78cece77c327ec8f65cec82f308&pid=1-s2.0-S2405673124000345-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasite Epidemiology and Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405673124000345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil-transmitted helminths (STH) are a significant public health problem in impoverished communities of tropical and subtropical areas. Improved diagnostic methods are crucial for Neglected Tropical Diseases programs, particularly for S. stercoralis, as traditional methods are inadequate. Thus, it is important to identify the most accurate and efficient methods for the diagnosis of STH. We performed a retrospective study analyzing laboratory data at the Instituto de Investigaciones de Enfermedades Tropicales from 2010 to 2019. The study included data from outpatients referred for stool analysis and public health interventions from urban and rural communities in northern Salta province, Argentina. Samples were included in this analysis if processed through sedimentation/concentration, Baermann, Harada-Mori and McMaster's, with a subgroup that also included Agar plate culture method (APC). Sensitivity was calculated against a composite reference standard. Of the 5625 samples collected, 944 qualified for this analysis, with a prevalence of 11.14% for A. lumbricoides, 8.16% for hookworm, 1.38% for T. trichiura, and 6.36% for S. stercoralis. The sedimentation/concentration method was the most sensitive for A. lumbricoides (96%), compared to the McMaster method, with a sensitivity of 62%. Similarly, for hookworms, sedimentation/concentration was more sensitive than McMaster's, Harada-Mori, and Baermann with sensitivities of 87%, 70%, 43%, and 13%, respectively. Most of these infections were of light intensity. For S. stercoralis, Baermann and sedimentation/concentration methods were the most sensitive, with 70% and 62% respectively, while Harada-Mori was the least sensitive. In a subset of 389 samples also analyzed by the APC, Baermann was more sensitive than APC for detecting S. stercoralis, and both methods were superior to Harada-Mori. Parasitological methods, mostly when used combined, offer adequate opportunities for the diagnosis of STH in clinical and public health laboratories. The incorporation of S. stercoralis into the control strategies of the World Health Organization requires rethinking the current diagnostic approach used for surveys. With sedimentation/concentration and Baermann appearing as the most sensitive methods for this species. Further studies, including implementation assessments, should help in identifying the most adequate and feasible all-STH diagnostic approach.

比较阿根廷西北部地区参考实验室鉴定土壤传播蠕虫(包括盘尾丝虫)的寄生虫学方法:一项观察性研究
土壤传播蠕虫(STH)是热带和亚热带地区贫困社区的一个重大公共卫生问题。改进诊断方法对被忽视的热带病计划至关重要,尤其是对盘尾丝虫病而言,因为传统方法并不完善。因此,确定最准确、最有效的丝虫病诊断方法非常重要。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,分析了热带病研究所 2010 年至 2019 年的实验室数据。研究包括阿根廷萨尔塔省北部城市和农村社区转诊的粪便分析和公共卫生干预门诊病人的数据。通过沉淀/浓缩法、Baermann法、Harada-Mori法和McMaster's法处理的样本被纳入本次分析,其中一个子组还包括琼脂平板培养法(APC)。灵敏度根据综合参考标准进行计算。在收集到的 5625 份样本中,有 944 份符合这一分析的条件,其中蓝线蛔虫感染率为 11.14%,钩虫感染率为 8.16%,毛滴虫感染率为 1.38%,盘尾丝虫感染率为 6.36%。与麦克马斯特法的 62% 的灵敏度相比,沉降/浓度法对腰线虫的灵敏度最高(96%)。同样,对于钩虫,沉降/浓缩法比麦克马斯特法、Harada-Mori 法和 Baermann 法更灵敏,灵敏度分别为 87%、70%、43% 和 13%。这些感染大多为轻度感染。对于盘尾丝虫,Baermann 法和沉降/浓度法的灵敏度最高,分别为 70% 和 62%,而 Harada-Mori 法的灵敏度最低。在同样用 APC 分析的 389 份样本中,Baermann 方法比 APC 方法更灵敏地检测出盘尾丝虫,而这两种方法都优于 Harada-Mori。在临床和公共卫生实验室中,寄生虫学方法(主要是联合使用时)为诊断 STH 提供了充分的机会。世界卫生组织将盘尾丝虫病纳入其控制策略,这就要求重新思考目前用于调查的诊断方法。沉降/浓度和 Baermann 似乎是对该物种最敏感的方法。进一步的研究,包括实施评估,应有助于确定最适当、最可行的全盘孢囊丝虫诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Parasite Epidemiology and Control
Parasite Epidemiology and Control Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Parasite Epidemiology and Control is an Open Access journal. There is an increasing amount of research in the parasitology area that analyses the patterns, causes, and effects of health and disease conditions in defined populations. This epidemiology of parasite infectious diseases is predominantly studied in human populations but also spans other major hosts of parasitic infections and as such this journal will have a broad remit. We will focus on the major areas of epidemiological study including disease etiology, disease surveillance, drug resistance and geographical spread and screening, biomonitoring, and comparisons of treatment effects in clinical trials for both human and other animals. We will also look at the epidemiology and control of vector insects. The journal will also cover the use of geographic information systems (Epi-GIS) for epidemiological surveillance which is a rapidly growing area of research in infectious diseases. Molecular epidemiological approaches are also particularly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信