The Development of a Food Waste Reduction Commitments Questionnaire Tool for Food Retailers in the United States

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Ren Chan BS, Mi Zhou PhD, MPH, Susan Chen PhD
{"title":"The Development of a Food Waste Reduction Commitments Questionnaire Tool for Food Retailers in the United States","authors":"Ren Chan BS,&nbsp;Mi Zhou PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Susan Chen PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In the United States (U.S.), approximately one-third of the food supply is wasted. Although few food waste policies exist to enforce food waste reduction (FWR) in food retail settings, many food retailers (FR) have corporate social responsibility (CSR) commitments to reduce food waste. To date, no evidence-based measurement tools exclusive for evaluating FWR efforts in food retail exist.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To develop and validate a questionnaire to evaluate FRs’ commitments to reduce food waste.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>This study had two phases; 1) to review existing literature to guide questionnaire development and 2) to conduct cognitive interviews to assess face validity of the developed questionnaire. Literature on existing FWR and sustainability frameworks guided the development of questionnaire items. Feedback for the questionnaire was gathered through structured cognitive interviews. Participants were recruited via purposive sampling. Inclusion criteria were that they were older than 18 years, worked in the U.S., and worked as a food systems researcher/professional.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Participants were asked about the overall questionnaire, areas that needed clarification, and the scoring system. Interviews continued until data saturation was met. The interviews were audio recorded, transcribed using Otter.AI, de-identified, and analyzed for recurring themes using inductive thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The initial questionnaire contained six domains informed by existing FWR literature. These included current FWR commitments, food waste prevention practices, food rescue practices, food recycling practices, other sustainability-informed practices, and future commitments. Participants of the cognitive interview (n=4) mentioned that the tool was comprehensive and aligned with the Environmental Protection Agency Wasted Food Scale. Suggestions for improvement included adding a domain to address retailers employee education for FWR, improving readability of the questionnaire, and including examples of public FWR policies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This evidence-based questionnaire comprehensively addresses areas for FWR among US FR. Future researchers can use this questionnaire to assess current CSR commitments toward FWR. Additionally, FR and policymakers can use this tool to guide the development of FWR initiatives.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>Circle of Friends</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":"56 8","pages":"Page S4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624001131","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In the United States (U.S.), approximately one-third of the food supply is wasted. Although few food waste policies exist to enforce food waste reduction (FWR) in food retail settings, many food retailers (FR) have corporate social responsibility (CSR) commitments to reduce food waste. To date, no evidence-based measurement tools exclusive for evaluating FWR efforts in food retail exist.

Objective

To develop and validate a questionnaire to evaluate FRs’ commitments to reduce food waste.

Study Design, Settings, Participants

This study had two phases; 1) to review existing literature to guide questionnaire development and 2) to conduct cognitive interviews to assess face validity of the developed questionnaire. Literature on existing FWR and sustainability frameworks guided the development of questionnaire items. Feedback for the questionnaire was gathered through structured cognitive interviews. Participants were recruited via purposive sampling. Inclusion criteria were that they were older than 18 years, worked in the U.S., and worked as a food systems researcher/professional.

Measurable Outcome/Analysis

Participants were asked about the overall questionnaire, areas that needed clarification, and the scoring system. Interviews continued until data saturation was met. The interviews were audio recorded, transcribed using Otter.AI, de-identified, and analyzed for recurring themes using inductive thematic analysis.

Results

The initial questionnaire contained six domains informed by existing FWR literature. These included current FWR commitments, food waste prevention practices, food rescue practices, food recycling practices, other sustainability-informed practices, and future commitments. Participants of the cognitive interview (n=4) mentioned that the tool was comprehensive and aligned with the Environmental Protection Agency Wasted Food Scale. Suggestions for improvement included adding a domain to address retailers employee education for FWR, improving readability of the questionnaire, and including examples of public FWR policies.

Conclusions

This evidence-based questionnaire comprehensively addresses areas for FWR among US FR. Future researchers can use this questionnaire to assess current CSR commitments toward FWR. Additionally, FR and policymakers can use this tool to guide the development of FWR initiatives.

Funding

Circle of Friends

为美国食品零售商开发减少食物浪费承诺问卷工具
背景美国约有三分之一的食品被浪费。虽然在食品零售环境中很少有减少食物浪费(FWR)的政策,但许多食品零售商(FR)都有减少食物浪费的企业社会责任(CSR)承诺。本研究分为两个阶段:1)回顾现有文献以指导问卷开发;2)进行认知访谈以评估所开发问卷的面效度。有关现有 FWR 和可持续性框架的文献为问卷项目的开发提供了指导。通过结构化认知访谈收集了对问卷的反馈意见。参与者是通过有目的的抽样招募的。可衡量的结果/分析参与者被问及整个问卷、需要澄清的领域以及评分系统。访谈一直持续到数据饱和为止。对访谈进行录音,使用 Otter.AI 进行转录,去除身份标识,并使用归纳式主题分析法对重复出现的主题进行分析。这些领域包括当前的 FWR 承诺、防止食物浪费实践、食物救援实践、食物回收实践、其他可持续发展实践以及未来承诺。认知访谈的参与者(n=4)提到,该工具很全面,与环境保护署的浪费食物量表一致。改进建议包括增加一个领域,以解决零售商员工的 FWR 教育问题,提高问卷的可读性,以及加入公共 FWR 政策的实例。未来的研究人员可以利用这份问卷来评估当前企业对 FWR 的承诺。此外,联邦共和国和政策制定者可以利用这一工具来指导 FWR 计划的制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas. The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信