Associations of Parent Feeding Practice Profiles With Feeding Styles, Child Diet Quality, and the Home Food Environment

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
{"title":"Associations of Parent Feeding Practice Profiles With Feeding Styles, Child Diet Quality, and the Home Food Environment","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Comprehensive Feeding Practices Questionnaire (CFPQ) is a validated measure of 12 aspects of parent feeding that have been associated with child dietary intake and health outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate latent profiles of CFPQ subscales (ie, patterns of individual responses) and test relationships with parental feeding styles (ie, authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, uninvolved), child adherence to dietary guidelines, and the home food environment.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>Secondary analysis of data from 118 maternal-child dyads in North Carolina assessed at child ages 3 and 5 years.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Profiles of the 12 CFPQ subscales were examined using Latent Profile Analysis. Multinomial regression estimated associations of CFPQ latent profiles with feeding styles measured by the Caregiver Feeding Styles Questionnaire (CFSQ). Linear regression examined associations of profile membership with child Healthy Eating Index 2020 (HEI) overall and separately for adequacy (eg, fruit, vegetables, whole grains, HEI-adq) and moderation (eg, refined grains, sodium, HEI-mod) components. Associations of the Home Food Inventory obesogenic score (HFI-OB) and fruit/vegetable score (HFI-FV) with CFPQ latent profiles were estimated using ANOVA. Significance was set at p&lt;0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fit indices (BIC and ICL) supported a three-profile model: 1 high supportive and low controlling practices, 2 high controlling and high supportive practices, and 3 moderate controlling and low supportive practices. CFSQ feeding styles did not predict CFPQ latent profile membership. Total HEI, HEI-adq and HEI-mod were lower in profile 1 than profile 3 (Total HEI β=-5.85, p=0.05; HEI-adq β=-3.65, p=0.06; HEI-mod β=-2.19, p=0.11). HFI-OB was lower in profile 1 than profile 2 (mean difference= -4.85, 95%CI= -9.00 - 0.70) and profile 3 (mean difference= -4.68, 95%CI= -8.40 - -0.97). HFI-FV was higher for profile 1 than profile 3 (mean difference= 3.30, 95%CI= 0.10-6.49).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Profiles of parents who have high supportive and low controlling feeding practices were associated with improved diet quality and home food environment compared to parents who had high controlling and high supportive or moderate controlling and low supportive practices.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>NIH</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624001878","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Comprehensive Feeding Practices Questionnaire (CFPQ) is a validated measure of 12 aspects of parent feeding that have been associated with child dietary intake and health outcomes.

Objective

To investigate latent profiles of CFPQ subscales (ie, patterns of individual responses) and test relationships with parental feeding styles (ie, authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, uninvolved), child adherence to dietary guidelines, and the home food environment.

Study Design, Settings, Participants

Secondary analysis of data from 118 maternal-child dyads in North Carolina assessed at child ages 3 and 5 years.

Measurable Outcome/Analysis

Profiles of the 12 CFPQ subscales were examined using Latent Profile Analysis. Multinomial regression estimated associations of CFPQ latent profiles with feeding styles measured by the Caregiver Feeding Styles Questionnaire (CFSQ). Linear regression examined associations of profile membership with child Healthy Eating Index 2020 (HEI) overall and separately for adequacy (eg, fruit, vegetables, whole grains, HEI-adq) and moderation (eg, refined grains, sodium, HEI-mod) components. Associations of the Home Food Inventory obesogenic score (HFI-OB) and fruit/vegetable score (HFI-FV) with CFPQ latent profiles were estimated using ANOVA. Significance was set at p<0.05.

Results

Fit indices (BIC and ICL) supported a three-profile model: 1 high supportive and low controlling practices, 2 high controlling and high supportive practices, and 3 moderate controlling and low supportive practices. CFSQ feeding styles did not predict CFPQ latent profile membership. Total HEI, HEI-adq and HEI-mod were lower in profile 1 than profile 3 (Total HEI β=-5.85, p=0.05; HEI-adq β=-3.65, p=0.06; HEI-mod β=-2.19, p=0.11). HFI-OB was lower in profile 1 than profile 2 (mean difference= -4.85, 95%CI= -9.00 - 0.70) and profile 3 (mean difference= -4.68, 95%CI= -8.40 - -0.97). HFI-FV was higher for profile 1 than profile 3 (mean difference= 3.30, 95%CI= 0.10-6.49).

Conclusions

Profiles of parents who have high supportive and low controlling feeding practices were associated with improved diet quality and home food environment compared to parents who had high controlling and high supportive or moderate controlling and low supportive practices.

Funding

NIH

家长喂养方式与喂养方式、儿童饮食质量和家庭饮食环境的关系
背景综合喂养实践问卷(CFPQ)是对父母喂养的 12 个方面进行的有效测量,这些方面与儿童的饮食摄入量和健康结果有关。目的调查 CFPQ 子量表的潜在特征(即个人反应模式),并测试其与父母喂养风格(即权威型、专制型、溺爱型、不参与型)、儿童遵守饮食指南的情况以及家庭饮食环境之间的关系。研究设计、设置、参与者对来自北卡罗来纳州 118 个母子二人组的数据进行二次分析,在儿童 3 岁和 5 岁时进行评估。多项式回归估算了 CFPQ 潜在特征与照顾者喂养方式问卷 (CFSQ) 所测量的喂养方式之间的关联。线性回归检验了特征成员与儿童健康饮食指数 2020(HEI)的整体关联,并分别检验了充足(如水果、蔬菜、全谷物,HEI-adq)和节制(如精制谷物、钠,HEI-mod)成分的关联。利用方差分析估算了家庭食物清单致肥分值(HFI-OB)和水果/蔬菜分值(HFI-FV)与 CFPQ 潜在特征之间的关系。结果拟合指数(BIC 和 ICL)支持三剖面模型:1 高支持、低控制;2 高控制、高支持;3 中等控制、低支持。CFSQ 喂养方式不能预测 CFPQ 潜在特征。特征 1 的总 HEI、HEI-adq 和 HEI-mod 均低于特征 3(总 HEI β=-5.85,p=0.05;HEI-adq β=-3.65,p=0.06;HEI-mod β=-2.19,p=0.11)。特征 1 的 HFI-OB 低于特征 2(平均差异=-4.85,95%CI= -9.00 -0.70)和特征 3(平均差异=-4.68,95%CI= -8.40 -0.97)。HFI-FV在特征1中高于特征3(平均差异=3.30,95%CI=0.10-6.49)。结论与高控制和高支持或中控制和低支持的父母相比,高支持和低控制的父母与饮食质量和家庭饮食环境的改善相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas. The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信