The soil bacterial communities show resilience in composition and function for 30 years of pine self-reforestation on agricultural lands in Western Russia

IF 4.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
{"title":"The soil bacterial communities show resilience in composition and function for 30 years of pine self-reforestation on agricultural lands in Western Russia","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The taxonomic and functional composition of the soil microbiome plays a crucial role in diverse ecosystem services including the carbon cycle and fertility, and is intricately linked to environmental conditions. Agricultural land abandonment followed by ecosystem changes and reforestation is widely spread in Eastern Europe and especially in Russia where up to 400,000 km<sup>2</sup> have been extracted from agricultural land-use and started to self-reforest. In boreal ecosystems, the reuse of abandoned lands for agriculture reduces the environmental risk connected with climate change. Therefore, there is a need to assess changes in soil parameters during long-term abandonment. This research aims to investigate the effect of natural pine reforestation on poor sandy ploughing lands on the taxonomic and functional composition of soil bacteria in Smolenskoe Poozerye National Park (western Russia). The soil microbial community of early stages (&lt;30 years of pine reforestation) and older stages (&gt;70 years of pine reforestation) differ significantly (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05): relative abundance of the dominant soil bacteria namely Acidobacteriota (13 % → 21 %), RCP2–54 (0.3 % → 6 %), Verrucomicrobiota (0.8 % → 0.9 %), Dependentiae (0.1 % → 0.7 %), WPS-2 (0.1 % → 1.2 %) increased, while the abundance of Actinobacteriota (24 % → 18 %), Chloroflexi (7 % → 0.7 %), Gemmatimonadota (2.8 % → 0.6 %), Myxococcota (3.2 % → 1.6 %), Bacteroidota (4.6 % → 1.5 %), Latescibacterota (0.1 % → 0 %), Nitrospirota (0.3 % → 0.01 %; p &lt; 0.05) decreased. In the 0–30 cm topsoil humus horizon, the younger forest soil microbiome was more similar to soils of meadows and agrocoenoses than to the older forests due to previous plough. Differences between the upper and lower parts of the previously homogenized ploughed horizon become more evident during pine reforestation. In terms of predicted metabolic pathways, the younger soil microbiome produces siderophores and degrades organic substances more actively (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Older forest communities show higher activity of fermentation, photosynthesis, non-organic nutrient assimilation and respiration (p &lt; 0.05). Our results also suggest that reforestation of poor sandy soils is not always beneficial for soil bacteria, since alpha-diversity decreases during succession and certain taxa are more abundant in soils of ploughing lands and native forests than at the transitional stages. The ploughing effect is preserved in soils studied for at least 30 years. The results obtained can be used in the environmental assessment to evaluate the degree and rate of restoration of soils in impacted areas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8099,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soil Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soil Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139324003019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The taxonomic and functional composition of the soil microbiome plays a crucial role in diverse ecosystem services including the carbon cycle and fertility, and is intricately linked to environmental conditions. Agricultural land abandonment followed by ecosystem changes and reforestation is widely spread in Eastern Europe and especially in Russia where up to 400,000 km2 have been extracted from agricultural land-use and started to self-reforest. In boreal ecosystems, the reuse of abandoned lands for agriculture reduces the environmental risk connected with climate change. Therefore, there is a need to assess changes in soil parameters during long-term abandonment. This research aims to investigate the effect of natural pine reforestation on poor sandy ploughing lands on the taxonomic and functional composition of soil bacteria in Smolenskoe Poozerye National Park (western Russia). The soil microbial community of early stages (<30 years of pine reforestation) and older stages (>70 years of pine reforestation) differ significantly (p < 0.05): relative abundance of the dominant soil bacteria namely Acidobacteriota (13 % → 21 %), RCP2–54 (0.3 % → 6 %), Verrucomicrobiota (0.8 % → 0.9 %), Dependentiae (0.1 % → 0.7 %), WPS-2 (0.1 % → 1.2 %) increased, while the abundance of Actinobacteriota (24 % → 18 %), Chloroflexi (7 % → 0.7 %), Gemmatimonadota (2.8 % → 0.6 %), Myxococcota (3.2 % → 1.6 %), Bacteroidota (4.6 % → 1.5 %), Latescibacterota (0.1 % → 0 %), Nitrospirota (0.3 % → 0.01 %; p < 0.05) decreased. In the 0–30 cm topsoil humus horizon, the younger forest soil microbiome was more similar to soils of meadows and agrocoenoses than to the older forests due to previous plough. Differences between the upper and lower parts of the previously homogenized ploughed horizon become more evident during pine reforestation. In terms of predicted metabolic pathways, the younger soil microbiome produces siderophores and degrades organic substances more actively (p < 0.05). Older forest communities show higher activity of fermentation, photosynthesis, non-organic nutrient assimilation and respiration (p < 0.05). Our results also suggest that reforestation of poor sandy soils is not always beneficial for soil bacteria, since alpha-diversity decreases during succession and certain taxa are more abundant in soils of ploughing lands and native forests than at the transitional stages. The ploughing effect is preserved in soils studied for at least 30 years. The results obtained can be used in the environmental assessment to evaluate the degree and rate of restoration of soils in impacted areas.

Abstract Image

俄罗斯西部农田松树自我造林 30 年后,土壤细菌群落的组成和功能显示出恢复力
土壤微生物组的分类和功能组成在包括碳循环和肥力在内的多种生态系统服务中发挥着至关重要的作用,并且与环境条件有着错综复杂的联系。在东欧,特别是在俄罗斯,农田废弃后生态系统发生变化并重新造林的现象非常普遍,在俄罗斯,多达 40 万公里的农田已脱离农田用途,开始自我造林。在北方生态系统中,将废弃土地重新用于农业可降低与气候变化相关的环境风险。因此,有必要评估长期弃耕过程中土壤参数的变化。本研究旨在调查斯摩棱斯克普泽耶国家公园(俄罗斯西部)贫瘠沙质耕地上的天然松树再造林对土壤细菌分类和功能组成的影响。早期阶段(松树造林 70 年)的土壤微生物群落差异显著(< 0.05):土壤优势细菌的相对丰度分别为酸性细菌群(13 % → 21 %)、RCP2-54(0.3 % → 6 %)、疣状微生物群(0.8 % → 0.9 %)、依附菌群(0.1 % → 0.7 %)、WPS-2(0.1 % → 1.2 %)有所增加,而放线菌群(24 % → 18 %)、绿藻菌群(7 % → 0.7 %)、宝石菌群(2.8 % → 0.6 %)、Myxococcota(3.2 % → 1.6 %)、Bacteroidota(4.6 % → 1.5 %)、Latescibacterota(0.1 % → 0 %)、Nitrospirota(0.3 % → 0.01 %; p < 0.05)减少。在 0-30 厘米表土腐殖质层中,年轻森林土壤微生物群组与草地和农田土壤更相似,而由于以前犁过地,与老森林土壤更相似。在松树重新造林过程中,先前犁过的同质化地层上部和下部之间的差异变得更加明显。从预测的新陈代谢途径来看,较年轻的土壤微生物群落更积极地产生嗜苷酸盐和降解有机物质(< 0.05)。较老的森林群落在发酵、光合作用、非有机养分同化和呼吸作用方面表现出更高的活性(p < 0.05)。我们的研究结果还表明,在贫瘠的沙质土壤上植树造林并不总是对土壤细菌有益,因为α-多样性在演替过程中会减少,与过渡阶段相比,某些类群在耕地和原始森林的土壤中更为丰富。在研究过的土壤中,犁耕效应至少保留了 30 年。研究结果可用于环境评估,以评价受影响地区土壤的恢复程度和速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Soil Ecology
Applied Soil Ecology 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
363
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soil Ecology addresses the role of soil organisms and their interactions in relation to: sustainability and productivity, nutrient cycling and other soil processes, the maintenance of soil functions, the impact of human activities on soil ecosystems and bio(techno)logical control of soil-inhabiting pests, diseases and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信