Exploring the Perceptions of Indian Mental Health Professionals Regarding Areca (Betel) Nut Products: A Cross-sectional Study

IF 1.9 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Anusa Arunachalam Mohandoss, Shahul Ameen, Rooban Thavarajah
{"title":"Exploring the Perceptions of Indian Mental Health Professionals Regarding Areca (Betel) Nut Products: A Cross-sectional Study","authors":"Anusa Arunachalam Mohandoss, Shahul Ameen, Rooban Thavarajah","doi":"10.1177/02537176241262737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Areca nut (AN) and AN products (ANPs) are commonly used as psychoactive substances with marked dependence potential. Scant information exists on the Indian mental health professionals’ (MHPs) knowledge of AN-ANPs, attitude toward AN-ANP use/users, and behavior regarding their clients’ AN-ANP use. To address this gap, a survey was undertaken to assess MHPs’ knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral responses toward AN-ANP use and addiction.Methods:We developed a pretested, customized questionnaire and conducted a cross-sectional online survey among a random sample of MHPs.Results:The 209 respondents included 91 psychiatrists, 105 clinical psychologists, and 13 other MHPs from diverse settings. Among them, 46.89% believed that AN-ANP use does not fit the definition of abuse/addiction as per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition or International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10)/ICD-11. Among the psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, and other MHPs, 60.4%, 48.6%, and 61.5% were unaware of any AN-ANP cessation protocols. The addictive potential of AN-ANP with tobacco was rated as severe by 68.1% of psychiatrists and 51.4% of clinical psychologists; 46.2% of other MHPs rated it as moderate. The addictive potential of AN-ANP without tobacco was rated as moderate by 50.5% of clinical psychologists and mild by 46.2% of psychiatrists. Of the sample, 67.46% discussed the harmful effects of AN-ANPs with clients, while 74.6% said a few or none of their clients sought help for AN-ANP cessation.Conclusion:Major lacunae were detected in the understanding of Indian MHPs about the addictive potential of AN-ANPs, management aspects, etc. An urgent need has been revealed for sensitization programs on AN-ANPs and the development of evidence-based cessation protocols.","PeriodicalId":13476,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176241262737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:Areca nut (AN) and AN products (ANPs) are commonly used as psychoactive substances with marked dependence potential. Scant information exists on the Indian mental health professionals’ (MHPs) knowledge of AN-ANPs, attitude toward AN-ANP use/users, and behavior regarding their clients’ AN-ANP use. To address this gap, a survey was undertaken to assess MHPs’ knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral responses toward AN-ANP use and addiction.Methods:We developed a pretested, customized questionnaire and conducted a cross-sectional online survey among a random sample of MHPs.Results:The 209 respondents included 91 psychiatrists, 105 clinical psychologists, and 13 other MHPs from diverse settings. Among them, 46.89% believed that AN-ANP use does not fit the definition of abuse/addiction as per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition or International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10)/ICD-11. Among the psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, and other MHPs, 60.4%, 48.6%, and 61.5% were unaware of any AN-ANP cessation protocols. The addictive potential of AN-ANP with tobacco was rated as severe by 68.1% of psychiatrists and 51.4% of clinical psychologists; 46.2% of other MHPs rated it as moderate. The addictive potential of AN-ANP without tobacco was rated as moderate by 50.5% of clinical psychologists and mild by 46.2% of psychiatrists. Of the sample, 67.46% discussed the harmful effects of AN-ANPs with clients, while 74.6% said a few or none of their clients sought help for AN-ANP cessation.Conclusion:Major lacunae were detected in the understanding of Indian MHPs about the addictive potential of AN-ANPs, management aspects, etc. An urgent need has been revealed for sensitization programs on AN-ANPs and the development of evidence-based cessation protocols.
探索印度心理健康专业人员对槟榔产品的看法:横断面研究
背景:阿甘果(AN)和阿甘果产品(ANPs)是常用的精神活性物质,具有明显的依赖性。有关印度精神卫生专业人员(MHPs)对AN-ANP的了解、对AN-ANP使用/使用者的态度以及对客户使用AN-ANP的行为的信息很少。为了弥补这一空白,我们开展了一项调查,以评估 MHPs 对 AN-ANP 使用和成瘾的知识、态度和行为反应。方法:我们编制了一份经过预先测试的定制问卷,并对随机抽样的 MHPs 进行了横断面在线调查。其中,46.89%的人认为使用AN-ANP不符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版或《国际疾病分类》第十次修订版(ICD-10)/ICD-11关于滥用/成瘾的定义。在精神科医生、临床心理学家和其他医护人员中,60.4%、48.6%和61.5%的人不知道有任何戒除苯丙胺类兴奋剂的方案。68.1%的精神科医生和51.4%的临床心理学家将AN-ANP的烟草成瘾性评为重度;46.2%的其他MHPs将其评为中度。50.5%的临床心理学家和46.2%的精神科医生将不含烟草的AN-ANP的成瘾性评为中度,将其评为轻度。在样本中,67.46%的人与客户讨论过无烟草烟雾剂的有害影响,而74.6%的人表示他们的客户中只有少数或没有人寻求戒除无烟草烟雾剂的帮助。因此,迫切需要开展有关苯丙胺类兴奋剂的宣传计划,并制定以证据为基础的戒烟方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
116
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine (ISSN 0253-7176) was started in 1978 as the official publication of the Indian Psychiatric Society South Zonal Branch. The journal allows free access (Open Access) and is published Bimonthly. The Journal includes but is not limited to review articles, original research, opinions, and letters. The Editor and publisher accept no legal responsibility for any opinions, omissions or errors by the authors, nor do they approve of any product advertised within the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信