Combined use of physically based hydrological model and empirical models to improve parameterisation of erosion processes in a flash flood prone catchment

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Atiyeh Hosseinzadeh, Hélène Roux, Ludovic Cassan, Audrey Douinot
{"title":"Combined use of physically based hydrological model and empirical models to improve parameterisation of erosion processes in a flash flood prone catchment","authors":"Atiyeh Hosseinzadeh,&nbsp;Hélène Roux,&nbsp;Ludovic Cassan,&nbsp;Audrey Douinot","doi":"10.1002/esp.5946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study assesses the effectiveness of a distributed physically based hydrological model (MARINE) to investigate erosion estimation during flash floods compared with other widely used empirical models derived from the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) like Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) and Modified Universal Soil Loss Equation (MUSLE). It is carried out on a small catchment in south-eastern France, the Claduègne catchment. To compare the erosion volumes simulated by the three models, MARINE, MUSLE and RUSLE, a sensitivity analysis on the model parameters is carried out. According to physics-based simulations, flood events fall into two categories: those dominated by raindrop erosion and those dominated by shear stress erosion. The results show that the erosion simulated by the three methods are comparable, except for events dominated by raindrop erosion suggesting that further research is needed to improve raindrop erosion within MARINE. Simulations from the MARINE model provide access to the spatio-temporal variability of erosion dynamics during the event and can also be used to produce erosion/deposition maps, which are useful for environmental decision-makers and planners in identifying areas at risk from erosion and deposition hazards.</p>","PeriodicalId":11408,"journal":{"name":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","volume":"49 12","pages":"3934-3948"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/esp.5946","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/esp.5946","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assesses the effectiveness of a distributed physically based hydrological model (MARINE) to investigate erosion estimation during flash floods compared with other widely used empirical models derived from the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) like Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) and Modified Universal Soil Loss Equation (MUSLE). It is carried out on a small catchment in south-eastern France, the Claduègne catchment. To compare the erosion volumes simulated by the three models, MARINE, MUSLE and RUSLE, a sensitivity analysis on the model parameters is carried out. According to physics-based simulations, flood events fall into two categories: those dominated by raindrop erosion and those dominated by shear stress erosion. The results show that the erosion simulated by the three methods are comparable, except for events dominated by raindrop erosion suggesting that further research is needed to improve raindrop erosion within MARINE. Simulations from the MARINE model provide access to the spatio-temporal variability of erosion dynamics during the event and can also be used to produce erosion/deposition maps, which are useful for environmental decision-makers and planners in identifying areas at risk from erosion and deposition hazards.

Abstract Image

结合使用基于物理的水文模型和经验模型,改进易受山洪侵袭流域的侵蚀过程参数化
本研究评估了基于分布式物理的水文模型(MARINE)与其他广泛使用的通用土壤流失方程(USLE)经验模型(如修订通用土壤流失方程(RUSLE)和修正通用土壤流失方程(MUSLE))相比,在研究山洪暴发期间的侵蚀估算方面的有效性。这项研究是在法国东南部的一个小型集水区(克拉杜涅集水区)进行的。为了比较 MARINE、MUSLE 和 RUSLE 三种模型模拟的侵蚀量,对模型参数进行了敏感性分析。根据基于物理学的模拟,洪水事件可分为两类:以雨滴侵蚀为主的洪水事件和以剪应力侵蚀为主的洪水事件。结果表明,除雨滴侵蚀为主的事件外,三种方法模拟的侵蚀效果相当,这表明需要进一步研究以改进 MARINE 模型中的雨滴侵蚀。MARINE 模型的模拟结果可提供事件发生期间侵蚀动态的时空变化,还可用于绘制侵蚀/沉积地图,这对环境决策者和规划者识别面临侵蚀和沉积危险的地区非常有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.10%
发文量
215
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms is an interdisciplinary international journal concerned with: the interactions between surface processes and landforms and landscapes; that lead to physical, chemical and biological changes; and which in turn create; current landscapes and the geological record of past landscapes. Its focus is core to both physical geographical and geological communities, and also the wider geosciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信