Different dropout directions in vocational education and training: the role of the initiating party and trainees’ reasons for dropping out

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Christian Michaelis, Stefanie Findeisen
{"title":"Different dropout directions in vocational education and training: the role of the initiating party and trainees’ reasons for dropping out","authors":"Christian Michaelis, Stefanie Findeisen","doi":"10.1186/s40461-024-00169-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The high rates of premature contract termination (PCT) in vocational education and training (VET) programs have led to an increasing number of studies examining the reasons why adolescents drop out. Since adolescents’ trajectories after a PCT are quite diverse, a thorough assessment of different <i>dropout directions</i> is called for. However, empirical studies that distinguish between dropout directions are still scarce. The same is true for studies that differentiate between PCTs initiated by the trainees themselves and those initiated by the training company. Based on data from the German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) on trainees in German dual VET programs (<i>n</i> = 5823), this study identifies six different dropout directions: (1) downward PCT into unqualified employment or unemployment, (2) downward PCT into a prevocational program, (3) horizontal PCT that represents a change of training company or (4) a change of occupation, and (5) upward PCT into general education or (6) higher education. Using multinomial logistic regression models we examine the effect of (a) the initiating party and (b) self-reported PCT reasons of trainees on dropout directions. Regarding trainees’ reasons we include reasons related to different aspects of the training (personal reasons, not the desired training occupation, financial reasons, training quality, conflicts, excessive demand, and being offered a different training position). The results indicate that in cases where trainees are dismissed by the training company, a horizontal change to a different training company becomes more likely, while the probability of an upward dropout into higher education decreases. Regarding PCT decisions made by trainees themselves, a downward PCT into unqualified employment or unemployment is more likely if personal reasons were the cause of a PCT decision. Moreover, the probability of a change of training company (horizontal PCT) increases in cases of conflict and if there is a prospect of a different training position, and decreases if the training position is not the desired occupation. A change of occupation (horizontal PCT) is more likely when there is the opportunity for a different training position available. Furthermore, upward PCTs (both into further general education and higher education) are more likely in cases where the training was in a field that was not the desired occupation. The probability of upward PCT into higher education decreases when there are conflicts and excessive demands, while upward PCTs into general education are significantly less likely when a different training position is obtained. The differential effects that occur for different types of PCTs emphasize that adolescents dropping out of VET cannot be treated as a homogenous group. Consequently, the results underscore the importance of conducting a more thorough assessment of both dropout directions and the initiating party of a PCT in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":38550,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-024-00169-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The high rates of premature contract termination (PCT) in vocational education and training (VET) programs have led to an increasing number of studies examining the reasons why adolescents drop out. Since adolescents’ trajectories after a PCT are quite diverse, a thorough assessment of different dropout directions is called for. However, empirical studies that distinguish between dropout directions are still scarce. The same is true for studies that differentiate between PCTs initiated by the trainees themselves and those initiated by the training company. Based on data from the German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) on trainees in German dual VET programs (n = 5823), this study identifies six different dropout directions: (1) downward PCT into unqualified employment or unemployment, (2) downward PCT into a prevocational program, (3) horizontal PCT that represents a change of training company or (4) a change of occupation, and (5) upward PCT into general education or (6) higher education. Using multinomial logistic regression models we examine the effect of (a) the initiating party and (b) self-reported PCT reasons of trainees on dropout directions. Regarding trainees’ reasons we include reasons related to different aspects of the training (personal reasons, not the desired training occupation, financial reasons, training quality, conflicts, excessive demand, and being offered a different training position). The results indicate that in cases where trainees are dismissed by the training company, a horizontal change to a different training company becomes more likely, while the probability of an upward dropout into higher education decreases. Regarding PCT decisions made by trainees themselves, a downward PCT into unqualified employment or unemployment is more likely if personal reasons were the cause of a PCT decision. Moreover, the probability of a change of training company (horizontal PCT) increases in cases of conflict and if there is a prospect of a different training position, and decreases if the training position is not the desired occupation. A change of occupation (horizontal PCT) is more likely when there is the opportunity for a different training position available. Furthermore, upward PCTs (both into further general education and higher education) are more likely in cases where the training was in a field that was not the desired occupation. The probability of upward PCT into higher education decreases when there are conflicts and excessive demands, while upward PCTs into general education are significantly less likely when a different training position is obtained. The differential effects that occur for different types of PCTs emphasize that adolescents dropping out of VET cannot be treated as a homogenous group. Consequently, the results underscore the importance of conducting a more thorough assessment of both dropout directions and the initiating party of a PCT in future research.

职业教育和培训中的不同辍学方向:发起方的作用和学员辍学的原因
职业教育与培训(VET)项目中提前终止合同(PCT)的比例很高,因此越来越多的研究开始探讨青少年辍学的原因。由于青少年在提前终止合同后的轨迹多种多样,因此需要对不同的辍学方向进行全面评估。然而,能够区分辍学方向的实证研究仍然很少。同样,区分由受训者自己发起的 PCT 和由培训公司发起的 PCT 的研究也是如此。根据德国国家教育小组研究(NEPS)中关于德国双元制职业教育与培训项目学员(n = 5823)的数据,本研究确定了六种不同的辍学方向:(1) 向下的 PCT,即进入无资质就业或失业;(2) 向下的 PCT,即进入职前教育项目;(3) 横向的 PCT,即更换培训公司或 (4) 更换职业;(5) 向上的 PCT,即进入普通教育或 (6) 高等教育。通过多项式逻辑回归模型,我们研究了(a)发起方和(b)学员自我报告的 PCT 原因对辍学方向的影响。关于学员的原因,我们包括与培训不同方面有关的原因(个人原因、不是理想的培训职业、经济原因、培训质量、冲突、需求过多以及被提供了不同的培训职位)。结果表明,如果受训人员被培训公司辞退,横向转到其他培训公司的可能性就会增加,而向上辍学接受高等教育的可能性则会降低。至于学员自己做出的 PCT 决定,如果个人原因是做出 PCT 决定的原因,则向下 PCT 转为无资质就业或失业的可能性更大。此外,如果存在冲突或有可能获得不同的培训职位,则更换培训公司(横向 PCT)的可能性会增加;如果培训职位不是理想职业,则更换培训公司(横向 PCT)的可能性会降低。如果有机会获得不同的培训职位,则更有可能改变职业(横向 PCT)。此外,如果培训领域不是理想职业,则更有可能出现向上的 PCT(包括普通进修和高等教育)。当存在冲突和过高要求时,升入高等教育的 PCT 可能性会降低,而当获得不同的培训职位时,升入普通教育的 PCT 可能性会明显降低。不同类型的 PCT 所产生的不同影响突出表明,从职业教育与培训中辍学的青少年不能被视为一个同质群体。因此,研究结果强调了在未来研究中对辍学方向和 PCT 发起方进行更全面评估的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
9
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The main focus of this journal is to provide a platform for original empirical investigations in the field of professional, vocational and technical education, comparing the effectiveness, efficiency and equity of different vocational education systems at the school, company and systemic level. The journal fills a gap in the existing literature focusing on empirically-oriented academic research and stimulating the interest in strengthening the vocational part of the educational system, both at the basic and higher education level.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信