The coupling effects of grass and shrub with biological crust on the overland flow hydrodynamic characteristics

IF 5.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"The coupling effects of grass and shrub with biological crust on the overland flow hydrodynamic characteristics","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2024.108281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Biological crust (BSC) is a common kind of ground cover that affects overland flow together with vegetation. It is important to understand the hydrodynamic mechanism of slope covered by both vegetation and BSC to clarify the water erosion dynamics. However, the coupling effects of vegetation and BSC on overland flow characteristics are still unclear. In this study, simulated rainfall was employed to explore the effects of different combinations of grasses, shrubs and BSC on the hydrodynamic characteristics of flow. The results showed that grasses, shrubs, BSC and vegetation combinations significantly reduced the flow velocity. Compared with the control check (CK), the flow velocities of the more BSC (MBSC), grass cover (GC) and shrub cover (SC) treatments were reduced by 50 %, 32 % and 14 %, respectively. The detention coefficient of different treatments increased with increasing BSC coverage. This result indicated that BSC played a dominant role in slowing the flow velocity under low-cover vegetation. The Froude number (<em>Fr</em>) of CK, GC, SC, and SC+GC were &gt; 1 during rainfall, indicating supercritical flow. The average <em>Fr</em> of the other treatments was &lt; 1, but <em>Fr</em> &gt; 1 was found in the less BSC (LBSC) and SC+LBSC treatments. The total flow resistance under different vegetation combinations did not conform to the simple linear stacking relationship. The interaction effect between different covers generated additional resistance, which varied among different ground cover combinations. The relationship between resistance coefficient (<em>f</em>) and Reynolds number (<em>Re</em>) gradually changed from a negative correlation for bare slopes to a positive correlation when vegetation or BSC existed, indicating that form resistance played a dominant role. It was concluded that BSC had a dominant effect on the hydraulic characteristics of overland flow in all ground cover treatments. This research provides a theoretical basis for the mechanism of erosion dynamics on slopes with combined vegetation and BSC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816224004788","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biological crust (BSC) is a common kind of ground cover that affects overland flow together with vegetation. It is important to understand the hydrodynamic mechanism of slope covered by both vegetation and BSC to clarify the water erosion dynamics. However, the coupling effects of vegetation and BSC on overland flow characteristics are still unclear. In this study, simulated rainfall was employed to explore the effects of different combinations of grasses, shrubs and BSC on the hydrodynamic characteristics of flow. The results showed that grasses, shrubs, BSC and vegetation combinations significantly reduced the flow velocity. Compared with the control check (CK), the flow velocities of the more BSC (MBSC), grass cover (GC) and shrub cover (SC) treatments were reduced by 50 %, 32 % and 14 %, respectively. The detention coefficient of different treatments increased with increasing BSC coverage. This result indicated that BSC played a dominant role in slowing the flow velocity under low-cover vegetation. The Froude number (Fr) of CK, GC, SC, and SC+GC were > 1 during rainfall, indicating supercritical flow. The average Fr of the other treatments was < 1, but Fr > 1 was found in the less BSC (LBSC) and SC+LBSC treatments. The total flow resistance under different vegetation combinations did not conform to the simple linear stacking relationship. The interaction effect between different covers generated additional resistance, which varied among different ground cover combinations. The relationship between resistance coefficient (f) and Reynolds number (Re) gradually changed from a negative correlation for bare slopes to a positive correlation when vegetation or BSC existed, indicating that form resistance played a dominant role. It was concluded that BSC had a dominant effect on the hydraulic characteristics of overland flow in all ground cover treatments. This research provides a theoretical basis for the mechanism of erosion dynamics on slopes with combined vegetation and BSC.

Abstract Image

草地和灌木与生物结壳对陆地流水动力特性的耦合效应
生物地壳(BSC)是一种常见的地面覆盖物,它与植被一起影响着陆地流。了解同时被植被和生物结壳覆盖的斜坡的水动力机制对阐明水蚀动力学非常重要。然而,植被和 BSC 对陆地流特征的耦合效应尚不清楚。本研究采用模拟降雨的方法,探讨了草地、灌木和 BSC 的不同组合对水流水动力特性的影响。结果表明,草、灌木、BSC 和植被组合能显著降低流速。与对照组(CK)相比,更多 BSC(MBSC)、草覆盖(GC)和灌木覆盖(SC)处理的流速分别降低了 50%、32% 和 14%。不同处理的滞留系数随 BSC 覆盖率的增加而增加。这一结果表明,在低覆盖率植被下,BSC 在减缓流速方面发挥了主导作用。在降雨过程中,CK、GC、SC 和 SC+GC 的 Froude 数()均大于 1,表明存在超临界流。其他处理的平均值为 1 的是少 BSC(LBSC)和 SC+LBSC 处理。不同植被组合下的总流阻不符合简单的线性叠加关系。不同植被之间的交互作用产生了额外的阻力,不同植被组合的阻力也各不相同。阻力系数()与雷诺数()之间的关系从裸露斜坡的负相关逐渐变为植被或 BSC 存在时的正相关,表明形式阻力起着主导作用。结论是,在所有地面覆盖物处理中,BSC 对陆地流的水力特性都有主要影响。这项研究为结合植被和 BSC 的斜坡侵蚀动力学机制提供了理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信