Strengthening links between science and technology experts and frontline diplomats to address science diplomacy challenges

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Blake Su, Jean‐Christophe Mauduit, Douglas Momberg, Lee E. Voth‐Gaeddert
{"title":"Strengthening links between science and technology experts and frontline diplomats to address science diplomacy challenges","authors":"Blake Su, Jean‐Christophe Mauduit, Douglas Momberg, Lee E. Voth‐Gaeddert","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.13418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The boundaries of knowledge within science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) domains are continuously advancing resulting in dynamic diplomatic applications. These shifting and expanding boundaries have direct implications in foreign policy. However, frontline diplomats have demanding day‐to‐day priorities that make it difficult to acquire, retain, and employ cutting edge STEM knowledge to advance national interests to their full potential. To aid in this objective, diplomatic institutions utilize STEM domain experts and traditional dissemination routes to support diplomatic personnel in STEM diplomacy issues. Routes commonly used include reports, briefings, trainings, and consultations. However, these routes may not always align with the timelines, workflows, and information systems used by frontline diplomats serving overseas. While many organizations focus on innovation <jats:italic>within</jats:italic> science diplomacy topics, opportunity also exists in innovation around linking experts with diplomats. Here we examine current linking approaches used to connect STEM experts and information with frontline diplomats to advance national interests. We utilize the US diplomatic network as an example to categorize current information flows and linking approaches. We then provide examples of common, underutilized, and alternative approaches. Our aim is to provide a clearer understanding of common linkages between STEM expert knowledge and frontline diplomats while highlighting potential alternatives.","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13418","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The boundaries of knowledge within science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) domains are continuously advancing resulting in dynamic diplomatic applications. These shifting and expanding boundaries have direct implications in foreign policy. However, frontline diplomats have demanding day‐to‐day priorities that make it difficult to acquire, retain, and employ cutting edge STEM knowledge to advance national interests to their full potential. To aid in this objective, diplomatic institutions utilize STEM domain experts and traditional dissemination routes to support diplomatic personnel in STEM diplomacy issues. Routes commonly used include reports, briefings, trainings, and consultations. However, these routes may not always align with the timelines, workflows, and information systems used by frontline diplomats serving overseas. While many organizations focus on innovation within science diplomacy topics, opportunity also exists in innovation around linking experts with diplomats. Here we examine current linking approaches used to connect STEM experts and information with frontline diplomats to advance national interests. We utilize the US diplomatic network as an example to categorize current information flows and linking approaches. We then provide examples of common, underutilized, and alternative approaches. Our aim is to provide a clearer understanding of common linkages between STEM expert knowledge and frontline diplomats while highlighting potential alternatives.
加强科技专家与一线外交官之间的联系,应对科学外交挑战
科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域的知识边界在不断进步,从而产生了动态的外交应用。这些不断变化和扩展的边界对外交政策有着直接影响。然而,一线外交官的日常工作任务繁重,难以获得、保留和运用最前沿的 STEM 知识,以充分发挥其潜力,推进国家利益。为了帮助实现这一目标,外交机构利用 STEM 领域的专家和传统的传播途径来支持外交人员解决 STEM 外交问题。常用的途径包括报告、简报、培训和咨询。然而,这些途径可能并不总是与在海外服务的一线外交官所使用的时间表、工作流程和信息系统相一致。虽然许多组织关注科学外交主题内的创新,但专家与外交官之间的联系也存在创新机会。在此,我们研究了当前用于将 STEM 专家和信息与一线外交官联系起来以促进国家利益的联系方法。我们以美国外交网络为例,对当前的信息流和联系方法进行分类。然后,我们举例说明了常见的、未充分利用的和可供选择的方法。我们的目的是更清楚地了解科学、技术、工程和数学专家知识与一线外交官之间的常见联系,同时强调潜在的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Policy
Global Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
125
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信