Legume choice and planting configuration influence intercrop nutrient and yield gains through complementarity and selection effects in legume-based wheat intercropping systems

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Muhammad Ali Raza , Atta Mohi Ud Din , Ghulam Abbas Shah , Wang Zhiqi , Ling Yang Feng , Hina Gul , Hassan Shehryar Yasin , Mohammad Shafiq ur Rahman , Chen Juan , Xue Liang , Raheela Rehman , Amal Mohamed Al Garawi , Wopke van der Werf , Ruijun Qin , Liu Xin , Muhammad Hayder Bin Khalid , Ma Zhongming
{"title":"Legume choice and planting configuration influence intercrop nutrient and yield gains through complementarity and selection effects in legume-based wheat intercropping systems","authors":"Muhammad Ali Raza ,&nbsp;Atta Mohi Ud Din ,&nbsp;Ghulam Abbas Shah ,&nbsp;Wang Zhiqi ,&nbsp;Ling Yang Feng ,&nbsp;Hina Gul ,&nbsp;Hassan Shehryar Yasin ,&nbsp;Mohammad Shafiq ur Rahman ,&nbsp;Chen Juan ,&nbsp;Xue Liang ,&nbsp;Raheela Rehman ,&nbsp;Amal Mohamed Al Garawi ,&nbsp;Wopke van der Werf ,&nbsp;Ruijun Qin ,&nbsp;Liu Xin ,&nbsp;Muhammad Hayder Bin Khalid ,&nbsp;Ma Zhongming","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><p>By exploiting the complementarities between intercrops, cereal/legume intercropping provides an opportunity to increase legume production with sustained cereal yield. However, little is known about how legume choice and spatial configurations affect the performance and economic viability of legume-based wheat intercropping, especially in arid-irrigated conditions.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>We conducted this study to investigate the complementarity of three different legumes (chickpea, soybean, and pea) with wheat and determine the appropriate strip width for intercrops.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>A three-year study (2021−2023) was conducted to evaluate the effects of legume choice and spatial configuration (narrow strips of 0.6 m (NS) and partially wide strips of 1.2 m (pWS) for each intercrop) on wheat/soybean, wheat/pea, and wheat/chickpea intercropping, and results were compared with their sole systems for dry matter, nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) uptake, yield, and economic returns. We also quantified the intensity of the net biodiversity effect (NE), complementarity effect (CE), and selection effect (SE) for yield, N (NE<sub>N</sub>, CE<sub>N</sub>, and SE<sub>N</sub>), and P (NE<sub>P</sub>, CE<sub>P</sub>, and SE<sub>P</sub>) gains of legume-based wheat intercropping systems.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Our results show that intercrops achieved the highest dry matter, nutrient uptake, and grain yield with pWS compared to NS. The intercropped chickpea, soybean, and pea achieved 67–71%, 55–62%, and 62–70% of their sole system yield. The intercropped wheat with chickpea, soybean, and pea produced 66–69%, 57–62%, and 62–66% of sole wheat yield, respectively. Results also confirmed a positive NE with both NS and pWS, mainly due to the higher CE, which ranges from 37% to 104% of NE under all intercropping systems. The nutrient uptake gain with NS and pWS ranged from −3.4 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> to 101.5 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> (NE<sub>N</sub>) and − 0.2 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> to 13.8 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> (NE<sub>P</sub>). On average, maximum LER (1.36), NE (1012 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>), NE<sub>N</sub> (86 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>), and NE<sub>P</sub> (12 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) were obtained with pWS in wheat/chickpea, followed by wheat/pea and wheat/soybean intercropping. Overall, wheat/pea intercropping with pWS generated the highest net profit (2014, 1533, and 1394 USD ha<sup>−1</sup> in 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively), which was primarily linked to the high market price of pea than chickpea and soybean.</p></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><p>These results imply that legume choice and spatial configurations influenced complementary and facilitation interactions between intercrops, and wheat/chickpea and wheat/pea intercropping with pWS could be adopted as a productive cropping strategy for obtaining higher and diverse crop yields with reduced land and nutrients than the sole wheat system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 104081"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002312","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT

By exploiting the complementarities between intercrops, cereal/legume intercropping provides an opportunity to increase legume production with sustained cereal yield. However, little is known about how legume choice and spatial configurations affect the performance and economic viability of legume-based wheat intercropping, especially in arid-irrigated conditions.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted this study to investigate the complementarity of three different legumes (chickpea, soybean, and pea) with wheat and determine the appropriate strip width for intercrops.

METHODS

A three-year study (2021−2023) was conducted to evaluate the effects of legume choice and spatial configuration (narrow strips of 0.6 m (NS) and partially wide strips of 1.2 m (pWS) for each intercrop) on wheat/soybean, wheat/pea, and wheat/chickpea intercropping, and results were compared with their sole systems for dry matter, nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) uptake, yield, and economic returns. We also quantified the intensity of the net biodiversity effect (NE), complementarity effect (CE), and selection effect (SE) for yield, N (NEN, CEN, and SEN), and P (NEP, CEP, and SEP) gains of legume-based wheat intercropping systems.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that intercrops achieved the highest dry matter, nutrient uptake, and grain yield with pWS compared to NS. The intercropped chickpea, soybean, and pea achieved 67–71%, 55–62%, and 62–70% of their sole system yield. The intercropped wheat with chickpea, soybean, and pea produced 66–69%, 57–62%, and 62–66% of sole wheat yield, respectively. Results also confirmed a positive NE with both NS and pWS, mainly due to the higher CE, which ranges from 37% to 104% of NE under all intercropping systems. The nutrient uptake gain with NS and pWS ranged from −3.4 kg ha−1 to 101.5 kg ha−1 (NEN) and − 0.2 kg ha−1 to 13.8 kg ha−1 (NEP). On average, maximum LER (1.36), NE (1012 kg ha−1), NEN (86 kg ha−1), and NEP (12 kg ha−1) were obtained with pWS in wheat/chickpea, followed by wheat/pea and wheat/soybean intercropping. Overall, wheat/pea intercropping with pWS generated the highest net profit (2014, 1533, and 1394 USD ha−1 in 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively), which was primarily linked to the high market price of pea than chickpea and soybean.

SIGNIFICANCE

These results imply that legume choice and spatial configurations influenced complementary and facilitation interactions between intercrops, and wheat/chickpea and wheat/pea intercropping with pWS could be adopted as a productive cropping strategy for obtaining higher and diverse crop yields with reduced land and nutrients than the sole wheat system.

Abstract Image

在以豆科植物为基础的小麦间作系统中,豆科植物的选择和种植配置通过互补和选择效应影响间作养分和产量的增加
通过利用间作作物之间的互补性,谷物/豆类间作提供了在保持谷物产量的同时提高豆类产量的机会。然而,人们对豆科植物的选择和空间配置如何影响基于豆科植物的小麦间作的表现和经济可行性知之甚少,尤其是在干旱灌溉条件下。我们开展了这项研究,以调查三种不同豆科植物(鹰嘴豆、大豆和豌豆)与小麦的互补性,并确定间作的适当带宽。我们开展了一项为期三年(2021-2023 年)的研究,以评估豆科植物的选择和空间配置(每种间作作物的窄带宽度为 0.6 米(NS),部分宽带宽度为 1.2 米(pWS))对小麦/大豆、小麦/豌豆和小麦/鹰嘴豆间作的影响,并将结果与单独种植系统的干物质、氮(N)和磷(P)吸收、产量和经济收益进行比较。我们还量化了以豆科植物为基础的小麦间作系统在产量、氮(NE、CE 和 SE)和磷(NE、CE 和 SE)收益方面的生物多样性净效应(NE)、互补效应(CE)和选择效应(SE)的强度。结果表明,与 NS 相比,间作小麦的干物质、养分吸收和谷物产量最高。间作鹰嘴豆、大豆和豌豆的产量分别是单作产量的 67-71%、55-62% 和 62-70%。间作小麦与鹰嘴豆、大豆和豌豆的产量分别是单作小麦产量的 66-69%、57-62% 和 62-66%。研究结果还证实,NS 和 pWS 均能产生正的 NE,这主要是因为 CE 较高,在所有间作系统中,CE 占 NE 的 37% 至 104%。NS和pWS的养分吸收增益分别为-3.4千克/公顷至101.5千克/公顷(NE)和-0.2千克/公顷至13.8千克/公顷(NE)。平均而言,在小麦/鹰嘴豆间作中,pWS 获得的 LER(1.36)、NE(1012 千克公顷)、NE(86 千克公顷)和 NE(12 千克公顷)最高,其次是小麦/豌豆和小麦/大豆间作。总体而言,小麦/豌豆间作与 pWS 产生的净利润最高(2021、2022 和 2023 年分别为 2014、1533 和 1394 美元公顷),这主要与豌豆的市场价格高于鹰嘴豆和大豆有关。这些结果表明,豆科植物的选择和空间配置影响着间作作物之间的互补和促进作用,小麦/鹰嘴豆和小麦/豌豆与 pWS 间作可作为一种高产种植策略,与单种小麦相比,能以更少的土地和养分获得更高的作物产量和多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信