{"title":"The academic and social-emotional flourishing framework","authors":"Rebecca J. Collie, Andrew J. Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Numerous motivation theories have been posited over the years that provide understanding about students' learning. More recently, educational researchers have drawn from social-emotional motivation literatures to further inform understanding of students' functioning. To date, however, work has yet to comprehensively consolidate understanding from these different approaches. The aim of this article is to integrate understanding that is evident across motivation and social-emotional conceptualizing to articulate a more unified model of students' academic and social-emotional functioning within academic contexts: the Academic and Social-Emotional Flourishing Framework (ASEFF). In this article, we introduce the framework, its conceptual underpinnings, and include a review of emerging research providing support for its tenets. Implications for research and practice are also discussed.</p></div><div><h3>Educational relevance and implications statement</h3><p>Our article brings together understanding from theories across academic and social-emotional domains to present the Academic and Social-Emotional Flourishing Framework (ASEFF). The framework provides understanding about the connections among academic and social-emotional factors, and how these are linked with students' outcomes at school and beyond.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102523"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104160802400116X/pdfft?md5=b769d17793b6fea7610ed070326bea30&pid=1-s2.0-S104160802400116X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104160802400116X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Numerous motivation theories have been posited over the years that provide understanding about students' learning. More recently, educational researchers have drawn from social-emotional motivation literatures to further inform understanding of students' functioning. To date, however, work has yet to comprehensively consolidate understanding from these different approaches. The aim of this article is to integrate understanding that is evident across motivation and social-emotional conceptualizing to articulate a more unified model of students' academic and social-emotional functioning within academic contexts: the Academic and Social-Emotional Flourishing Framework (ASEFF). In this article, we introduce the framework, its conceptual underpinnings, and include a review of emerging research providing support for its tenets. Implications for research and practice are also discussed.
Educational relevance and implications statement
Our article brings together understanding from theories across academic and social-emotional domains to present the Academic and Social-Emotional Flourishing Framework (ASEFF). The framework provides understanding about the connections among academic and social-emotional factors, and how these are linked with students' outcomes at school and beyond.
期刊介绍:
Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).