Comprehensive assessment of fire hazard for polyurethane foam based on AHP-entropy-weighted TOPSIS

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Rongshui Qin, Chenchen Shi, Tao Yu, Chao Ding, Jing Zhan, Yan Jiao, Zelong Zhang
{"title":"Comprehensive assessment of fire hazard for polyurethane foam based on AHP-entropy-weighted TOPSIS","authors":"Rongshui Qin, Chenchen Shi, Tao Yu, Chao Ding, Jing Zhan, Yan Jiao, Zelong Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10973-024-13435-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study introduces an innovative evaluation framework synergizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), entropy method, and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method to analyze the fire hazards associated with various types of polyurethane foam. By integrating subjective and objective assessments through the AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS method, it transcends the limitations of traditional evaluation techniques, enhancing both accuracy and reliability. Leveraging data from cone calorimeter tests, a detailed hierarchy of fire behavior indicators is established, prioritizing heat release rates and toxic gas emissions as key factors in assessing fire risk. The application of this multi-faceted evaluation framework to five distinct polyurethane materials reveals a clear ranking of fire hazards, highlighting the critical importance of selecting appropriate flame-retardant additives. According to the composite score index evaluated by AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS method, the study concludes that the materials fire hazards are ranked as follows: PU (0.6927) exhibits the highest fire hazard, followed by PU/14APP/1B<sub>4</sub>F (0.6044), PU/14APP/1PMA (0.5634), PU/15APP (0.4010), and PU/15BIO (0.3421) presenting the lowest fire hazard among the materials evaluated. This research contributes invaluable insights into fire hazard assessment, guiding material scientists and engineers toward safer polyurethane formulations and advancing the field of fire safety engineering.</p>","PeriodicalId":678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-024-13435-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study introduces an innovative evaluation framework synergizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), entropy method, and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method to analyze the fire hazards associated with various types of polyurethane foam. By integrating subjective and objective assessments through the AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS method, it transcends the limitations of traditional evaluation techniques, enhancing both accuracy and reliability. Leveraging data from cone calorimeter tests, a detailed hierarchy of fire behavior indicators is established, prioritizing heat release rates and toxic gas emissions as key factors in assessing fire risk. The application of this multi-faceted evaluation framework to five distinct polyurethane materials reveals a clear ranking of fire hazards, highlighting the critical importance of selecting appropriate flame-retardant additives. According to the composite score index evaluated by AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS method, the study concludes that the materials fire hazards are ranked as follows: PU (0.6927) exhibits the highest fire hazard, followed by PU/14APP/1B4F (0.6044), PU/14APP/1PMA (0.5634), PU/15APP (0.4010), and PU/15BIO (0.3421) presenting the lowest fire hazard among the materials evaluated. This research contributes invaluable insights into fire hazard assessment, guiding material scientists and engineers toward safer polyurethane formulations and advancing the field of fire safety engineering.

Abstract Image

基于 AHP-熵权 TOPSIS 的聚氨酯泡沫火灾危险综合评估
本研究介绍了一种创新的评估框架,该框架综合了层次分析法(AHP)、熵法和理想解相似度排序偏好技术(TOPSIS)法,用于分析与各类聚氨酯泡沫相关的火灾危险。通过 AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS 方法整合主观和客观评估,它超越了传统评估技术的局限性,提高了准确性和可靠性。利用锥形量热计测试的数据,建立了详细的火灾行为指标等级,优先考虑热释放率和有毒气体排放,将其作为评估火灾风险的关键因素。将这一多方面的评估框架应用于五种不同的聚氨酯材料时,发现了火灾危险的明确等级,突出了选择适当阻燃添加剂的重要性。根据 AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS 方法评估的综合得分指数,研究得出的材料火灾危险性排序如下:聚氨酯(0.6927)的火灾危险性最高,其次是 PU/14APP/1B4F(0.6044)、PU/14APP/1PMA(0.5634)、PU/15APP(0.4010),PU/15BIO(0.3421)的火灾危险性最低。这项研究为火灾危险评估提供了宝贵的见解,指导材料科学家和工程师开发更安全的聚氨酯配方,并推动了消防安全工程领域的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry is a fully peer reviewed journal publishing high quality papers covering all aspects of thermal analysis, calorimetry, and experimental thermodynamics. The journal publishes regular and special issues in twelve issues every year. The following types of papers are published: Original Research Papers, Short Communications, Reviews, Modern Instruments, Events and Book reviews. The subjects covered are: thermogravimetry, derivative thermogravimetry, differential thermal analysis, thermodilatometry, differential scanning calorimetry of all types, non-scanning calorimetry of all types, thermometry, evolved gas analysis, thermomechanical analysis, emanation thermal analysis, thermal conductivity, multiple techniques, and miscellaneous thermal methods (including the combination of the thermal method with various instrumental techniques), theory and instrumentation for thermal analysis and calorimetry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信