Systematic “Apple-to-Apple” Comparison of Single-Crystal and Polycrystalline Ni-Rich Cathode Active Materials: From Comparable Synthesis to Comparable Electrochemical Conditions
Marco Joes Lüther, Shi-Kai Jiang, Martin Alexander Lange, Julius Buchmann, Aurora Gómez Martín, Richard Schmuch, Tobias Placke, Bing Joe Hwang, Martin Winter, Johannes Kasnatscheew
{"title":"Systematic “Apple-to-Apple” Comparison of Single-Crystal and Polycrystalline Ni-Rich Cathode Active Materials: From Comparable Synthesis to Comparable Electrochemical Conditions","authors":"Marco Joes Lüther, Shi-Kai Jiang, Martin Alexander Lange, Julius Buchmann, Aurora Gómez Martín, Richard Schmuch, Tobias Placke, Bing Joe Hwang, Martin Winter, Johannes Kasnatscheew","doi":"10.1002/sstr.202400119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"State-of-the-art ternary layered oxide cathode active materials in Li-ion batteries (LIBs) consist of polycrystalline (PC), i.e., micron-sized secondary particles, which in turn consist of numerous nanosized primary particles. Recent approaches to develop single crystals (SCs), i.e., single and separated micron-sized primary particles, appear promising in terms of cycle life given their mechanical stability. However, a direct and systematic (“fair”) comparison of SC with PC in LIB cell application remains a challenge due to both differences on material level and state-of-charge (SoC), as SCs typically have slightly lower delithiation capacities/Li<sup>+</sup> extraction ratios. In this work, PC and SC Li[Ni<sub>0.8</sub>Mn<sub>0.1</sub>Co<sub>0.1</sub>]O<sub>2</sub> (NMC811) are synthesized with comparable bulk and surface characteristics from identical self-synthesized precursors. Indeed, the cycle life of SCs is not only superior, when conventionally charged to equal upper cutoff voltage (UCV), as shown in NMC||Li and NMC||graphite cells, but also after adjusting UCVs to similar SoCs, where bigger SCs counterintuitively have even a better rate performance and cycle life.","PeriodicalId":21841,"journal":{"name":"Small Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Small Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sstr.202400119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
State-of-the-art ternary layered oxide cathode active materials in Li-ion batteries (LIBs) consist of polycrystalline (PC), i.e., micron-sized secondary particles, which in turn consist of numerous nanosized primary particles. Recent approaches to develop single crystals (SCs), i.e., single and separated micron-sized primary particles, appear promising in terms of cycle life given their mechanical stability. However, a direct and systematic (“fair”) comparison of SC with PC in LIB cell application remains a challenge due to both differences on material level and state-of-charge (SoC), as SCs typically have slightly lower delithiation capacities/Li+ extraction ratios. In this work, PC and SC Li[Ni0.8Mn0.1Co0.1]O2 (NMC811) are synthesized with comparable bulk and surface characteristics from identical self-synthesized precursors. Indeed, the cycle life of SCs is not only superior, when conventionally charged to equal upper cutoff voltage (UCV), as shown in NMC||Li and NMC||graphite cells, but also after adjusting UCVs to similar SoCs, where bigger SCs counterintuitively have even a better rate performance and cycle life.