Electrified fleet and infrastructure aware energy efficient routing

IF 15 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Joon Moon , Hamza Anwar , Manfredi Villani , Muhammad Qaisar Fahim , Priyank Jain , Kesavan Ramakrishnan , Qadeer Ahmed
{"title":"Electrified fleet and infrastructure aware energy efficient routing","authors":"Joon Moon ,&nbsp;Hamza Anwar ,&nbsp;Manfredi Villani ,&nbsp;Muhammad Qaisar Fahim ,&nbsp;Priyank Jain ,&nbsp;Kesavan Ramakrishnan ,&nbsp;Qadeer Ahmed","doi":"10.1016/j.etran.2024.100351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents an optimization framework to improve the energy efficiency and cost-effectiveness of fleets of commercial trucks operating pickups and deliveries in urban areas. As the electrification of transportation is moving from passenger cars to medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, the proposed analysis considers a fleet of pickup and delivery trucks that includes conventional internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEV), as well as battery electric vehicles (BEV), and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV). Given a set of pickups and deliveries, and a fleet including different types of vehicles, the goal is twofold: assign the best vehicle to each task, and solve the vehicle routing problem, i.e., find the optimal route to navigate the vehicle from the origin to the destination(s). To estimate the energy consumption of the different vehicles, vehicle dynamics are considered, together with actual charging infrastructure and road data, including speed limits, road grade, and stop signs. Moreover, the total cost of ownership (TCO) is evaluated to estimate the cost-effectiveness of different fleet compositions and operations. To solve this problem, a hybrid simulated annealing (HSA) heuristic algorithm is proposed. The algorithm is validated against a benchmark exact solver based on mixed integer linear programming (MILP). The proposed methodology achieves optimal results with a 1.2% optimality gap compared to the benchmark, surpassing MILP in computational efficiency. The research findings highlight how fleet composition and operational strategies can vary significantly based on whether the focus is on energy efficiency, total cost of ownership, or a combination of the two, also depending on the number of years of operation. Simulation case studies in the Columbus, OH area demonstrate that integrating fleet and recharging infrastructure information alongside energy savings in vehicle routing problem solutions can achieve 20% to 50% savings in fleet operation costs compared to solely optimizing for minimum energy consumption.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36355,"journal":{"name":"Etransportation","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100351"},"PeriodicalIF":15.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590116824000419/pdfft?md5=bc59cd94115e70cb95862b51c8fb55e4&pid=1-s2.0-S2590116824000419-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Etransportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590116824000419","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents an optimization framework to improve the energy efficiency and cost-effectiveness of fleets of commercial trucks operating pickups and deliveries in urban areas. As the electrification of transportation is moving from passenger cars to medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, the proposed analysis considers a fleet of pickup and delivery trucks that includes conventional internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEV), as well as battery electric vehicles (BEV), and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV). Given a set of pickups and deliveries, and a fleet including different types of vehicles, the goal is twofold: assign the best vehicle to each task, and solve the vehicle routing problem, i.e., find the optimal route to navigate the vehicle from the origin to the destination(s). To estimate the energy consumption of the different vehicles, vehicle dynamics are considered, together with actual charging infrastructure and road data, including speed limits, road grade, and stop signs. Moreover, the total cost of ownership (TCO) is evaluated to estimate the cost-effectiveness of different fleet compositions and operations. To solve this problem, a hybrid simulated annealing (HSA) heuristic algorithm is proposed. The algorithm is validated against a benchmark exact solver based on mixed integer linear programming (MILP). The proposed methodology achieves optimal results with a 1.2% optimality gap compared to the benchmark, surpassing MILP in computational efficiency. The research findings highlight how fleet composition and operational strategies can vary significantly based on whether the focus is on energy efficiency, total cost of ownership, or a combination of the two, also depending on the number of years of operation. Simulation case studies in the Columbus, OH area demonstrate that integrating fleet and recharging infrastructure information alongside energy savings in vehicle routing problem solutions can achieve 20% to 50% savings in fleet operation costs compared to solely optimizing for minimum energy consumption.

电动化的车队和基础设施,可实现节能路由
本文提出了一个优化框架,以提高在城市地区从事取货和送货的商用卡车车队的能源效率和成本效益。由于运输电气化正从乘用车向中型和重型车辆发展,本文提出的分析考虑了包括传统内燃机汽车(ICEV)、电池电动汽车(BEV)和插电式混合动力电动汽车(PHEV)在内的皮卡和送货卡车车队。给定一组取货和送货任务以及包括不同类型车辆在内的车队,目标有两个:为每项任务分配最佳车辆,以及解决车辆路由问题,即找到将车辆从出发地引向目的地的最佳路线。为了估算不同车辆的能耗,需要考虑车辆动态以及实际充电基础设施和道路数据,包括速度限制、道路坡度和停车标志。此外,还对总体拥有成本(TCO)进行了评估,以估算不同车队组成和运营的成本效益。为解决这一问题,提出了一种混合模拟退火(HSA)启发式算法。该算法与基于混合整数线性规划(MILP)的基准精确求解器进行了验证。所提出的方法实现了最优结果,与基准算法相比,最优性差距仅为 1.2%,在计算效率上超过了 MILP。研究结果强调了车队组成和运营策略如何根据关注点是能源效率、总拥有成本还是两者的结合而发生显著变化,同时也取决于运营年限。俄亥俄州哥伦布市地区的模拟案例研究表明,在车辆路由问题解决方案中,将车队和充电基础设施信息与节能相结合,可比单纯优化最低能耗节省 20% 至 50% 的车队运营成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Etransportation
Etransportation Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
19.80
自引率
12.60%
发文量
57
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: eTransportation is a scholarly journal that aims to advance knowledge in the field of electric transportation. It focuses on all modes of transportation that utilize electricity as their primary source of energy, including electric vehicles, trains, ships, and aircraft. The journal covers all stages of research, development, and testing of new technologies, systems, and devices related to electrical transportation. The journal welcomes the use of simulation and analysis tools at the system, transport, or device level. Its primary emphasis is on the study of the electrical and electronic aspects of transportation systems. However, it also considers research on mechanical parts or subsystems of vehicles if there is a clear interaction with electrical or electronic equipment. Please note that this journal excludes other aspects such as sociological, political, regulatory, or environmental factors from its scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信