A Randomized Trial Comparing Concurrent versus Sequential Radiation and Endocrine Therapy in Early-Stage, Hormone-Responsive Breast Cancer

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Sharon F. McGee, Mark Clemons, Gregory Pond, Jean-Michel Caudrelier, Michelle Liu, Mashari Jemaan Alzahrani, Terry L. Ng, Arif A. Awan, Sandeep Sehdev, John Hilton, Marie-France Savard, Lesley Fallowfield, Vikaash Kumar, Orit Freedman, Lisa Vandermeer, Brian Hutton, Jean-Marc Bourque
{"title":"A Randomized Trial Comparing Concurrent versus Sequential Radiation and Endocrine Therapy in Early-Stage, Hormone-Responsive Breast Cancer","authors":"Sharon F. McGee, Mark Clemons, Gregory Pond, Jean-Michel Caudrelier, Michelle Liu, Mashari Jemaan Alzahrani, Terry L. Ng, Arif A. Awan, Sandeep Sehdev, John Hilton, Marie-France Savard, Lesley Fallowfield, Vikaash Kumar, Orit Freedman, Lisa Vandermeer, Brian Hutton, Jean-Marc Bourque","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31080338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concerns exist regarding increased toxicities, including endocrine therapy toxicity, with concurrent radiation and endocrine therapy in early breast cancer (EBC). We present a pragmatic, randomized trial comparing concurrent versus sequential endocrine and radiotherapy in hormone-responsive EBC. In this multicenter trial, patients were randomized to receive adjuvant endocrine therapy concurrent with, or sequential to, radiotherapy. The primary outcome was change in endocrine therapy toxicity from baseline to 3 months post radiotherapy using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Endocrine Symptom (FACT-ES) score. From September 2019 to January 2021, 133 patients were randomized to concurrent endocrine and radiotherapy, and 127 to sequential treatment. Most patients were post-menopausal (72.7%, 189/260) with stage 1 disease (65.8%, 171/260). Tamoxifen was the endocrine therapy of choice for 69.6% (181/260) of patients, and an aromatase inhibitor for the remainder. The median total radiation dose and fractions were 40.1 Gray (range 26–50) and 15 fractions (range 5–25), respectively. For the primary outcome of change in endocrine therapy toxicity per FACT-ES scores from baseline to 3 months post radiotherapy, no significant difference was found between the groups (median [range] = −4.9 (−82, 38.8) for concurrent and −5.1 (−42, 40) for sequential, p = 0.87). This is the first trial to investigate the impact of concurrent versus sequential adjuvant endocrine and radiotherapy on endocrine therapy-related toxicities. The findings provide further support to allow the optimal timing of radiation and endocrine therapy to be tailored for the individual patient.","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31080338","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Concerns exist regarding increased toxicities, including endocrine therapy toxicity, with concurrent radiation and endocrine therapy in early breast cancer (EBC). We present a pragmatic, randomized trial comparing concurrent versus sequential endocrine and radiotherapy in hormone-responsive EBC. In this multicenter trial, patients were randomized to receive adjuvant endocrine therapy concurrent with, or sequential to, radiotherapy. The primary outcome was change in endocrine therapy toxicity from baseline to 3 months post radiotherapy using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Endocrine Symptom (FACT-ES) score. From September 2019 to January 2021, 133 patients were randomized to concurrent endocrine and radiotherapy, and 127 to sequential treatment. Most patients were post-menopausal (72.7%, 189/260) with stage 1 disease (65.8%, 171/260). Tamoxifen was the endocrine therapy of choice for 69.6% (181/260) of patients, and an aromatase inhibitor for the remainder. The median total radiation dose and fractions were 40.1 Gray (range 26–50) and 15 fractions (range 5–25), respectively. For the primary outcome of change in endocrine therapy toxicity per FACT-ES scores from baseline to 3 months post radiotherapy, no significant difference was found between the groups (median [range] = −4.9 (−82, 38.8) for concurrent and −5.1 (−42, 40) for sequential, p = 0.87). This is the first trial to investigate the impact of concurrent versus sequential adjuvant endocrine and radiotherapy on endocrine therapy-related toxicities. The findings provide further support to allow the optimal timing of radiation and endocrine therapy to be tailored for the individual patient.
比较早期激素反应性乳腺癌患者同时接受放疗和内分泌治疗与顺序接受放疗和内分泌治疗的随机试验
早期乳腺癌(EBC)患者同时接受放疗和内分泌治疗会增加毒性,包括内分泌治疗毒性,这一点令人担忧。我们介绍了一项务实的随机试验,该试验比较了激素反应性 EBC 患者同时接受内分泌治疗和放疗与连续接受内分泌治疗的差异。在这项多中心试验中,患者被随机分配在接受放疗的同时或先后接受辅助内分泌治疗。主要研究结果是内分泌治疗毒性从基线到放疗后3个月的变化,采用癌症治疗-内分泌症状功能评估(FACT-ES)评分。从2019年9月到2021年1月,133名患者被随机分配到同时接受内分泌治疗和放疗,127名患者被随机分配到顺序治疗。大多数患者为绝经后(72.7%,189/260),疾病为1期(65.8%,171/260)。69.6%的患者(181/260)选择他莫昔芬作为内分泌疗法,其余患者则选择芳香化酶抑制剂。总放射剂量和放射次数的中位数分别为40.1格雷(26-50次)和15次(5-25次)。放疗后3个月内分泌治疗毒性的主要结果是FACT-ES评分从基线到放疗后3个月的变化,两组间没有发现显著差异(同期放疗的中位数[范围]=-4.9(-82,38.8),序贯放疗的中位数[范围]=-5.1(-42,40),P=0.87)。这是首次研究同期与顺序辅助内分泌和放疗对内分泌治疗相关毒性的影响的试验。研究结果进一步支持了根据患者的具体情况确定放疗和内分泌治疗的最佳时机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信