Crowdsourcing solutions for innovation: An evolutionary examination of participant behavior strategy

IF 2.5 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Lingling Wang, Sen Li, Haidong Zheng, Enjun Xia
{"title":"Crowdsourcing solutions for innovation: An evolutionary examination of participant behavior strategy","authors":"Lingling Wang,&nbsp;Sen Li,&nbsp;Haidong Zheng,&nbsp;Enjun Xia","doi":"10.1002/mde.4359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite numerous enterprises embracing crowdsourcing to access several innovative solutions, the prevalence of information asymmetry among different participants has led to an increase in the submission of low-quality solutions and payment disputes. To improve the efficiency of crowdsourcing solutions for innovation, this study aims to employ an evolutionary game model to capture the dynamic interaction and decision-making process of the requesters, platforms, and solvers. Initially, we dissect the relevant factors influencing the behavioral decisions of participants to construct a tripartite evolutionary game model. Subsequently, we analyze five potential evolutionarily stable strategies and conditions. Ultimately, we simulate the dynamic evolution of participant decision-making behavior and the sensitivity of related parameters. The simulation results depict that the initial selection probabilities of populations bear no correlation to the system stability, which only influences the time required to reach equilibrium. The participant's behaviors are affected by price, loss, penalty, compensation, cost, and reputation recognition. Reward and punishment mechanisms help effectively mitigate the emergence of free-riding and collusion. These findings provide important implications for the sustainable development of crowdsourcing solutions for innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18186,"journal":{"name":"Managerial and Decision Economics","volume":"45 8","pages":"5679-5695"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial and Decision Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4359","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite numerous enterprises embracing crowdsourcing to access several innovative solutions, the prevalence of information asymmetry among different participants has led to an increase in the submission of low-quality solutions and payment disputes. To improve the efficiency of crowdsourcing solutions for innovation, this study aims to employ an evolutionary game model to capture the dynamic interaction and decision-making process of the requesters, platforms, and solvers. Initially, we dissect the relevant factors influencing the behavioral decisions of participants to construct a tripartite evolutionary game model. Subsequently, we analyze five potential evolutionarily stable strategies and conditions. Ultimately, we simulate the dynamic evolution of participant decision-making behavior and the sensitivity of related parameters. The simulation results depict that the initial selection probabilities of populations bear no correlation to the system stability, which only influences the time required to reach equilibrium. The participant's behaviors are affected by price, loss, penalty, compensation, cost, and reputation recognition. Reward and punishment mechanisms help effectively mitigate the emergence of free-riding and collusion. These findings provide important implications for the sustainable development of crowdsourcing solutions for innovation.

众包创新解决方案:对参与者行为策略的进化研究
尽管众多企业通过众包获得了一些创新解决方案,但由于不同参与者之间普遍存在信息不对称,导致提交的低质量解决方案和支付纠纷增多。为了提高众包创新解决方案的效率,本研究旨在采用进化博弈模型来捕捉请求者、平台和解决者的动态互动和决策过程。首先,我们剖析了影响参与者行为决策的相关因素,构建了一个三方进化博弈模型。随后,我们分析了五种潜在的进化稳定策略和条件。最后,我们模拟了参与者决策行为的动态演化及相关参数的敏感性。模拟结果表明,种群的初始选择概率与系统稳定性无关,只影响达到平衡所需的时间。参与者的行为受到价格、损失、惩罚、补偿、成本和声誉认可的影响。奖惩机制有助于有效缓解搭便车和串通行为的出现。这些发现对众包创新解决方案的可持续发展具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
242
期刊介绍: Managerial and Decision Economics will publish articles applying economic reasoning to managerial decision-making and management strategy.Management strategy concerns practical decisions that managers face about how to compete, how to succeed, and how to organize to achieve their goals. Economic thinking and analysis provides a critical foundation for strategic decision-making across a variety of dimensions. For example, economic insights may help in determining which activities to outsource and which to perfom internally. They can help unravel questions regarding what drives performance differences among firms and what allows these differences to persist. They can contribute to an appreciation of how industries, organizations, and capabilities evolve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信