That's my autocrat: Self‐uncertainty elevates support for autocratic leadership during Canada's Freedom Convoy

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Kathryn M. Kincaid, Angela C. Ma, David E. Rast, Michael A. Hogg
{"title":"That's my autocrat: Self‐uncertainty elevates support for autocratic leadership during Canada's Freedom Convoy","authors":"Kathryn M. Kincaid, Angela C. Ma, David E. Rast, Michael A. Hogg","doi":"10.1111/asap.12414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:label/>Canada's 2022 Freedom Convoy protests and blockades caused significant disruption, and many Canadians advocated for strong, forceful, and even autocratic responses from their government. In democratic nations, autocratic leadership is typically seen as undesirable and receives less support than democratic leadership. However, when group members experience significant identity‐related self‐uncertainty, they may have an accentuated desire for strong, directive leadership to help manage the uncertainty. Canadian participants (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 406) reported their level of self‐uncertainty, rated how autocratic they perceived Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to be, reported their level of support for Justin Trudeau, and reported their support for strong responses to the Freedom Convoy. Self‐uncertainty moderated the relationship between leadership style and leader support. Perceived autocratic leadership style predicted significantly less leader support, but this relationship was weakened among participants high in self‐uncertainty, who reported increased support for an autocratic leader. Further, self‐uncertainty predicted a greater desire for a strong leader, willingness to restrict civil liberties, and support for expanded government powers. These results suggest that the typical preference for democratic leadership weakens when self‐uncertainty is elevated.Public significance statementUncertainty about one's identity lays the groundwork for autocratic leadership to emerge. Elevated self‐uncertainty was associated with a greater desire for a strong leader who is willing to challenge democratic values and practices, a greater willingness to restrict civil liberties, greater support for expanded government powers in response to a national crisis, and greater support for a national leader perceived as autocratic.","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"160 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12414","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Canada's 2022 Freedom Convoy protests and blockades caused significant disruption, and many Canadians advocated for strong, forceful, and even autocratic responses from their government. In democratic nations, autocratic leadership is typically seen as undesirable and receives less support than democratic leadership. However, when group members experience significant identity‐related self‐uncertainty, they may have an accentuated desire for strong, directive leadership to help manage the uncertainty. Canadian participants (N = 406) reported their level of self‐uncertainty, rated how autocratic they perceived Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to be, reported their level of support for Justin Trudeau, and reported their support for strong responses to the Freedom Convoy. Self‐uncertainty moderated the relationship between leadership style and leader support. Perceived autocratic leadership style predicted significantly less leader support, but this relationship was weakened among participants high in self‐uncertainty, who reported increased support for an autocratic leader. Further, self‐uncertainty predicted a greater desire for a strong leader, willingness to restrict civil liberties, and support for expanded government powers. These results suggest that the typical preference for democratic leadership weakens when self‐uncertainty is elevated.Public significance statementUncertainty about one's identity lays the groundwork for autocratic leadership to emerge. Elevated self‐uncertainty was associated with a greater desire for a strong leader who is willing to challenge democratic values and practices, a greater willingness to restrict civil liberties, greater support for expanded government powers in response to a national crisis, and greater support for a national leader perceived as autocratic.
这才是我的独裁者:加拿大 "自由之旅 "期间,自我不确定性提升了对专制领导的支持度
加拿大 2022 年的 "自由车队 "抗议和封锁活动造成了严重破坏,许多加拿大人主张政府采取强硬、有力甚至专制的应对措施。在民主国家,专制领导通常被视为不可取,获得的支持也少于民主领导。然而,当群体成员经历了与身份相关的重大自我不确定性时,他们可能会更加渴望强有力的、指令性的领导来帮助管理这种不确定性。加拿大参与者(N = 406)报告了他们的自我不确定性水平,评定了他们认为贾斯汀-特鲁多(Justin Trudeau)总理的专制程度,报告了他们对贾斯汀-特鲁多的支持程度,并报告了他们对强有力地应对自由车队的支持程度。自我不确定性调节了领导风格与领导支持之间的关系。所认为的专制领导风格会显著降低领导者的支持率,但这种关系在自我不确定性较高的参与者中有所减弱,因为他们对专制领导者的支持率更高。此外,自我不确定性还预示了对强势领导者的更大渴望、限制公民自由的意愿以及对扩大政府权力的支持。这些结果表明,当自我不确定性升高时,对民主领导的典型偏好就会减弱。自我不确定性的升高与以下因素相关:更希望有一个愿意挑战民主价值观和实践的强有力的领导者;更愿意限制公民自由;更支持在应对国家危机时扩大政府权力;更支持被视为专制的国家领导人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Recent articles in ASAP have examined social psychological methods in the study of economic and social justice including ageism, heterosexism, racism, sexism, status quo bias and other forms of discrimination, social problems such as climate change, extremism, homelessness, inter-group conflict, natural disasters, poverty, and terrorism, and social ideals such as democracy, empowerment, equality, health, and trust.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信