Establishing a standard protocol for soil texture analysis using the laser diffraction technique

Isis S. P. C. Scott, Kossi Nouwakpo, Dave Bjorneberg, Christopher Rogers, Lauren Vitko
{"title":"Establishing a standard protocol for soil texture analysis using the laser diffraction technique","authors":"Isis S. P. C. Scott,&nbsp;Kossi Nouwakpo,&nbsp;Dave Bjorneberg,&nbsp;Christopher Rogers,&nbsp;Lauren Vitko","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Optical methods including laser diffraction have been increasingly used to measure soil texture and particle size distribution. However, they have not been adopted yet as a routine methodology mainly due to the difficulties in comparing their results to more commonly used techniques (i.e., sedimentation methods). Many attempts exist in the literature to find an agreement between methodologies with relative success. In this work, we aim to improve the agreement between methodologies by adjusting parameters of the laser diffraction analysis, including sample treatment (chemical dispersion, carbonate removal, and sand separation), mode of sample addition (subsampling vs. transmittance matching), and analysis parameters (time of sonication and refractive index). Soil texture class determined by laser diffraction agreed with the sieve–hydrometer method in 78% of the runs when the following parameters were used: (1) Refractive index of 1.44 - 0.100i, (2) 180 s of sonication, (3) sand sieving prior to analysis, and (4) sample dispersion by shaking the sample for 1 h with 5% sodium hexametaphosphate. We observed that adding the entire sample to the analyzer (1 g of soil in 100 mL of dispersant) while keeping the appropriate levels of transmittance through dilution (transmittance matching) is a better way of sample addition in comparison to subsampling, especially for coarser soil samples. This work proposes a standard operation procedure that may broaden the adoption of laser diffraction analysis as a routine soil texture methodology.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optical methods including laser diffraction have been increasingly used to measure soil texture and particle size distribution. However, they have not been adopted yet as a routine methodology mainly due to the difficulties in comparing their results to more commonly used techniques (i.e., sedimentation methods). Many attempts exist in the literature to find an agreement between methodologies with relative success. In this work, we aim to improve the agreement between methodologies by adjusting parameters of the laser diffraction analysis, including sample treatment (chemical dispersion, carbonate removal, and sand separation), mode of sample addition (subsampling vs. transmittance matching), and analysis parameters (time of sonication and refractive index). Soil texture class determined by laser diffraction agreed with the sieve–hydrometer method in 78% of the runs when the following parameters were used: (1) Refractive index of 1.44 - 0.100i, (2) 180 s of sonication, (3) sand sieving prior to analysis, and (4) sample dispersion by shaking the sample for 1 h with 5% sodium hexametaphosphate. We observed that adding the entire sample to the analyzer (1 g of soil in 100 mL of dispersant) while keeping the appropriate levels of transmittance through dilution (transmittance matching) is a better way of sample addition in comparison to subsampling, especially for coarser soil samples. This work proposes a standard operation procedure that may broaden the adoption of laser diffraction analysis as a routine soil texture methodology.

利用激光衍射技术制定土壤质地分析标准协议
包括激光衍射在内的光学方法已越来越多地用于测量土壤质地和粒度分布。然而,这些方法尚未被作为常规方法采用,主要原因是很难将其结果与更常用的技术(即沉积法)进行比较。文献中存在许多尝试,试图找到方法之间的一致性,但都相对成功。在这项工作中,我们旨在通过调整激光衍射分析的参数,包括样品处理(化学分散、碳酸盐去除和砂分离)、样品添加模式(子取样与透射率匹配)和分析参数(超声时间和折射率),来提高不同方法之间的一致性。在使用以下参数的情况下,激光衍射法测定的土壤质地等级与筛分-水分测定法的一致率为 78%:(1) 折射率为 1.44 - 0.100i;(2) 超声处理 180 秒;(3) 分析前筛沙;(4) 用 5%六偏磷酸钠振荡样品 1 小时以分散样品。我们观察到,将整个样品加入分析仪(100 毫升分散剂中加入 1 克土壤),同时通过稀释保持适当的透射率水平(透射率匹配),是一种比子取样更好的样品添加方式,尤其是对于较粗的土壤样品。这项工作提出了一种标准操作程序,可扩大激光衍射分析作为常规土壤质地方法的应用范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信