Celebrating the “Invisible”: The Role of Organizational Diversity Approaches on Attracting and Retaining LGBTQ + Talent

IF 3.7 2区 心理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Kshitij Mor, Seval Gündemir, Jojanneke van der Toorn
{"title":"Celebrating the “Invisible”: The Role of Organizational Diversity Approaches on Attracting and Retaining LGBTQ + Talent","authors":"Kshitij Mor, Seval Gündemir, Jojanneke van der Toorn","doi":"10.1007/s10869-024-09975-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Organizations vary in diversity approaches. Some recognize and celebrate group differences (identity consciousness), while others deem these differences unimportant and deemphasize them (identity blindness). Research on diversity approaches’ impact on workplace perceptions and experiences of marginalized groups has grown but focuses mainly on “visible” groups (e.g., racial minorities, women) while largely overlooking the potential impact on “invisible” groups (e.g., LGBTQ + individuals). Integrating the diversity approaches paradigm with signaling and identity safety theory, this research addresses this oversight. Three pre-registered studies (<i>N</i><sub>total</sub> = 1318) investigate whether LGBTQ + individuals prefer identity-conscious organizations for employment because they perceive this approach as a signal of safety and acceptance for their identity. Findings reveal that identity consciousness (vs. identity blindness) is associated with increased attraction towards organizations among prospective (Studies 1 and 2) and lower turnover intentions among incumbent (Study 3) LGBTQ + workers. Identity safety (measured through employees’ sense of authenticity, belonging, and justice) mediates these relationships. Exploratory analyses indicate that, compared to their cisgender counterparts, transgender participants generally report more negative workplace experiences and expectations (Studies 1–3). Furthermore, there is suggestive evidence that transgender individuals who publicly disclose their identity may exhibit an even more positive response towards diversity-conscious organizations. We discuss the implications of these findings and conclude that identity consciousness signals and creates an identity-safe working environment for LGBTQ + individuals, improves their workplace experiences, and enhances organizations’ ability to attract and retain LGBTQ + talent.</p>","PeriodicalId":48254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business and Psychology","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-024-09975-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organizations vary in diversity approaches. Some recognize and celebrate group differences (identity consciousness), while others deem these differences unimportant and deemphasize them (identity blindness). Research on diversity approaches’ impact on workplace perceptions and experiences of marginalized groups has grown but focuses mainly on “visible” groups (e.g., racial minorities, women) while largely overlooking the potential impact on “invisible” groups (e.g., LGBTQ + individuals). Integrating the diversity approaches paradigm with signaling and identity safety theory, this research addresses this oversight. Three pre-registered studies (Ntotal = 1318) investigate whether LGBTQ + individuals prefer identity-conscious organizations for employment because they perceive this approach as a signal of safety and acceptance for their identity. Findings reveal that identity consciousness (vs. identity blindness) is associated with increased attraction towards organizations among prospective (Studies 1 and 2) and lower turnover intentions among incumbent (Study 3) LGBTQ + workers. Identity safety (measured through employees’ sense of authenticity, belonging, and justice) mediates these relationships. Exploratory analyses indicate that, compared to their cisgender counterparts, transgender participants generally report more negative workplace experiences and expectations (Studies 1–3). Furthermore, there is suggestive evidence that transgender individuals who publicly disclose their identity may exhibit an even more positive response towards diversity-conscious organizations. We discuss the implications of these findings and conclude that identity consciousness signals and creates an identity-safe working environment for LGBTQ + individuals, improves their workplace experiences, and enhances organizations’ ability to attract and retain LGBTQ + talent.

Abstract Image

庆祝 "隐形":组织多样性方法对吸引和留住 LGBTQ + 人才的作用
各组织采用的多样性方法各不相同。一些组织承认并赞美群体差异(身份意识),而另一些组织则认为这些差异并不重要,不予重视(身份盲)。关于多元化方法对边缘化群体的工作场所认知和体验的影响的研究不断增加,但主要集中在 "可见 "群体(如少数民族、女性),而在很大程度上忽视了对 "不可见 "群体(如 LGBTQ + 个人)的潜在影响。本研究将多样性方法范式与信号传递和身份安全理论相结合,解决了这一疏忽问题。三项预先登记的研究(总人数 = 1318 人)调查了 LGBTQ + 个人在就业时是否更喜欢有身份意识的组织,因为他们认为这种方法是安全和接受其身份的信号。研究结果表明,身份意识(与身份盲目性相比)与潜在(研究 1 和 2)LGBTQ + 员工对组织的吸引力增加以及在职(研究 3)LGBTQ + 员工的离职意向降低有关。身份安全(通过员工的真实感、归属感和正义感来衡量)在这些关系中起着中介作用。探索性分析表明,与同性别的参与者相比,变性参与者通常会报告更多负面的工作场所经历和期望(研究 1-3)。此外,有暗示性证据表明,公开披露自己身份的变性人可能会对具有多样性意识的组织表现出更加积极的反应。我们讨论了这些发现的意义,并得出结论:身份意识为 LGBTQ + 个人发出信号并创造了一个身份安全的工作环境,改善了他们的职场体验,提高了组织吸引和留住 LGBTQ + 人才的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business and Psychology (JBP) is an international outlet publishing high quality research designed to advance organizational science and practice. Since its inception in 1986, the journal has published impactful scholarship in Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Organizational Behavior, Human Resources Management, Work Psychology, Occupational Psychology, and Vocational Psychology. Typical subject matters include Team processes and effectiveness Customer service and satisfaction Employee recruitment, selection, and promotion Employee engagement and withdrawal Organizational culture and climate Training, development and coaching Mentoring and socialization Performance management, appraisal and feedback Workplace diversity Leadership Workplace health, stress, and safety Employee attitudes and satisfaction Careers and retirement Organizational communication Technology and work Employee motivation and job design Organizational change and development Employee citizenship and deviance Organizational effectiveness Work-nonwork/work-family Rigorous quantitative, qualitative, field-based, and lab-based empirical studies are welcome. Interdisciplinary scholarship is valued and encouraged. Submitted manuscripts should be well-grounded conceptually and make meaningful contributions to scientific understandingsand/or the advancement of science-based practice. The Journal of Business and Psychology is - A high quality/impactful outlet for organizational science research - A journal dedicated to bridging the science/practice divide - A journal striving to create interdisciplinary connections For details on submitting manuscripts, please read the author guidelines found in the far right menu.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信