Adaptive Recruitment Resource Allocation to Improve Cohort Representativeness in Participatory Biomedical Datasets

Victor Borza, Andrew Estornell, Ellen Wright Clayton, Chien-Ju Ho, Russell Rothman, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik, Bradley Malin
{"title":"Adaptive Recruitment Resource Allocation to Improve Cohort Representativeness in Participatory Biomedical Datasets","authors":"Victor Borza, Andrew Estornell, Ellen Wright Clayton, Chien-Ju Ho, Russell Rothman, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik, Bradley Malin","doi":"arxiv-2408.01375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large participatory biomedical studies, studies that recruit individuals to\njoin a dataset, are gaining popularity and investment, especially for analysis\nby modern AI methods. Because they purposively recruit participants, these\nstudies are uniquely able to address a lack of historical representation, an\nissue that has affected many biomedical datasets. In this work, we define\nrepresentativeness as the similarity to a target population distribution of a\nset of attributes and our goal is to mirror the U.S. population across\ndistributions of age, gender, race, and ethnicity. Many participatory studies\nrecruit at several institutions, so we introduce a computational approach to\nadaptively allocate recruitment resources among sites to improve\nrepresentativeness. In simulated recruitment of 10,000-participant cohorts from\nmedical centers in the STAR Clinical Research Network, we show that our\napproach yields a more representative cohort than existing baselines. Thus, we\nhighlight the value of computational modeling in guiding recruitment efforts.","PeriodicalId":501112,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.01375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large participatory biomedical studies, studies that recruit individuals to join a dataset, are gaining popularity and investment, especially for analysis by modern AI methods. Because they purposively recruit participants, these studies are uniquely able to address a lack of historical representation, an issue that has affected many biomedical datasets. In this work, we define representativeness as the similarity to a target population distribution of a set of attributes and our goal is to mirror the U.S. population across distributions of age, gender, race, and ethnicity. Many participatory studies recruit at several institutions, so we introduce a computational approach to adaptively allocate recruitment resources among sites to improve representativeness. In simulated recruitment of 10,000-participant cohorts from medical centers in the STAR Clinical Research Network, we show that our approach yields a more representative cohort than existing baselines. Thus, we highlight the value of computational modeling in guiding recruitment efforts.
自适应招募资源分配,提高参与式生物医学数据集中的队列代表性
大型参与式生物医学研究(即招募个人加入数据集的研究)越来越受欢迎,投资也越来越多,尤其是在使用现代人工智能方法进行分析时。由于这些研究有目的性地招募参与者,因此能独特地解决缺乏历史代表性的问题,而这个问题已经影响到许多生物医学数据集。在这项工作中,我们将代表性定义为一组属性与目标人群分布的相似性,我们的目标是在年龄、性别、种族和民族分布方面反映美国人口。许多参与式研究在多个机构进行招募,因此我们引入了一种计算方法,以适应性地在各研究机构之间分配招募资源,从而提高代表性。在对 STAR 临床研究网络医疗中心的 10,000 名参与者队列进行的模拟招募中,我们发现,与现有的基线相比,我们的方法能产生更具代表性的队列。因此,我们强调了计算建模在指导招募工作中的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信