Ernesto Lleras Manrique, Ángel Alonso Gutiérrez Pérez
{"title":"Community of Learning as a World-Building Environment","authors":"Ernesto Lleras Manrique, Ángel Alonso Gutiérrez Pérez","doi":"10.1007/s11213-024-09683-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this article, we present what we believe to be the fundamental problem of production systems in Colombia: the domination relationships inherited from colonial structures. We introduce the theoretical foundations of the <i>Community of Learning</i> approach, which we have been developing over the past decades as an option to overcome this issue. We argue that, in the contemporary Latin American context, these relationships are intertwined with the training of individuals for integration into the productive system and its close association with technological tools. This results in the establishment of a domineering sociotechnical system linked to coloniality which some authors associate with modernity. The theoretical foundation of the learning communities approach stems from a philosophical tradition that seeks to examine from a systemic point of view the relationships of domination that produce the alienation of the subject. Our proposal is to establish a pedagogical space for transcending relations of domination, where individuals can explore their identities through interactions with others. In this approach, we aim to foster spaces for collective world-building by affirming one’s own subjectivity within interactions with the environment. We view the technical dimension as inherently linked to these interactions. We term this approach the <i>Community of Learning</i> model, wherein we collectively shape the world through practices that are seen as meaningful actions transforming relationships into learning processes. This approach can be regarded as a means to transcend the domineering aspects of technological practices while concurrently engaging in learning and world-building endeavors. We present, as an example, the results obtained in several cases applying this approach and some proposals that can contribute to effective practices when implementing the <i>Community of Learning</i> approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":51694,"journal":{"name":"Systemic Practice and Action Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systemic Practice and Action Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-024-09683-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this article, we present what we believe to be the fundamental problem of production systems in Colombia: the domination relationships inherited from colonial structures. We introduce the theoretical foundations of the Community of Learning approach, which we have been developing over the past decades as an option to overcome this issue. We argue that, in the contemporary Latin American context, these relationships are intertwined with the training of individuals for integration into the productive system and its close association with technological tools. This results in the establishment of a domineering sociotechnical system linked to coloniality which some authors associate with modernity. The theoretical foundation of the learning communities approach stems from a philosophical tradition that seeks to examine from a systemic point of view the relationships of domination that produce the alienation of the subject. Our proposal is to establish a pedagogical space for transcending relations of domination, where individuals can explore their identities through interactions with others. In this approach, we aim to foster spaces for collective world-building by affirming one’s own subjectivity within interactions with the environment. We view the technical dimension as inherently linked to these interactions. We term this approach the Community of Learning model, wherein we collectively shape the world through practices that are seen as meaningful actions transforming relationships into learning processes. This approach can be regarded as a means to transcend the domineering aspects of technological practices while concurrently engaging in learning and world-building endeavors. We present, as an example, the results obtained in several cases applying this approach and some proposals that can contribute to effective practices when implementing the Community of Learning approach.
期刊介绍:
Systemic Practice and Action Research is dedicated to advancing deeper understandings of issues that confront the contemporary world, and better means for engaging with these issues for the benefit of individuals, organizations, communities and their natural environments. To this end, a fundamental rethink of the purposes and methods of science is needed, making it more systemic and action-orientated. The journal therefore seeks to make a substantial contribution to rethinking science as well as to the reflective application of systemic practice and action research in all types of organizational and social settings. This international journal is committed to nurturing wide-ranging conversations around both qualitative and technical approaches for the betterment of people''s lives and ways of working together. It seeks to influence policy and strategy in its advocacy of action research as a primary means to gain vision and leverage in wicked problem areas. All forms of investigation and reasoning are considered potentially suitable for publication, including personal experience. There are no priorities attached to settings for studies and no greater significance given to one methodological style over another - as long as the work demonstrates a reflective and systemic quality. The journal welcomes manuscripts that are original, are well written, and contain a vivid argument. Papers normally will demonstrate knowledge of existing literature. Full papers are normally between 5,000 – 10,000 words (although longer papers will not be excluded if the argument justifies the word count) and short papers are about 2,000 words. Notes and letters are welcomed for publication in the ''notes from the field'' and ''letters'' sections. A rigorous mentoring-based refereeing system is applied in all cases. Officially cited as: Syst Pract Action Res