Responses of soil seed banks and soil microbial activity to grazing exclusion in cold semiarid grasslands

IF 2.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Shadi Hazhir, R. Erfanzadeh, Seyed Zanko Pirkhezri, B. Razavi, Péter Török
{"title":"Responses of soil seed banks and soil microbial activity to grazing exclusion in cold semiarid grasslands","authors":"Shadi Hazhir, R. Erfanzadeh, Seyed Zanko Pirkhezri, B. Razavi, Péter Török","doi":"10.1111/rec.14245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The soil seed bank (SSB) and soil microbial communities are among the most crucial drivers of belowground biodiversity in grasslands. Changes in components of soil biodiversity following protection from grazing were observed in cold, semiarid grasslands. To study these changes, soil samples were taken in an intensively grazed area and in an exclosure established 20 years prior to this study. In particular, changes in biodiversity components such as SSB and microbial activities in two soil depths (0–5 and 5–10 cm) were measured. Nonmetric dimensional scaling showed that after grazing removal, the SSB had changed. SSB density, richness, and diversity were higher in the ungrazed plots. The increase in SSB density and diversity in the exclosure may have been caused by the absence of direct adverse effects of grazing on the SSB, like trampling and plant consumption, or by reduced indirect effects, such as seed germination facilitation in canopy gaps created by grazing animals. The effect of grazing removal on basal respiration, substrate‐induced respiration, and urease activity was highly significant (p < 0.01) and may be due to an increase in soil moisture after grazing exclusion. The effect of grazing removal on soil biological parameters was greater in the upper layer than in the deeper soil layer. This study shows that grazing exclusion can be a useful approach in restoring components of soil biodiversity.","PeriodicalId":54487,"journal":{"name":"Restoration Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restoration Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14245","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The soil seed bank (SSB) and soil microbial communities are among the most crucial drivers of belowground biodiversity in grasslands. Changes in components of soil biodiversity following protection from grazing were observed in cold, semiarid grasslands. To study these changes, soil samples were taken in an intensively grazed area and in an exclosure established 20 years prior to this study. In particular, changes in biodiversity components such as SSB and microbial activities in two soil depths (0–5 and 5–10 cm) were measured. Nonmetric dimensional scaling showed that after grazing removal, the SSB had changed. SSB density, richness, and diversity were higher in the ungrazed plots. The increase in SSB density and diversity in the exclosure may have been caused by the absence of direct adverse effects of grazing on the SSB, like trampling and plant consumption, or by reduced indirect effects, such as seed germination facilitation in canopy gaps created by grazing animals. The effect of grazing removal on basal respiration, substrate‐induced respiration, and urease activity was highly significant (p < 0.01) and may be due to an increase in soil moisture after grazing exclusion. The effect of grazing removal on soil biological parameters was greater in the upper layer than in the deeper soil layer. This study shows that grazing exclusion can be a useful approach in restoring components of soil biodiversity.
寒冷半干旱草原土壤种子库和土壤微生物活动对放牧排斥的反应
土壤种子库(SSB)和土壤微生物群落是草原地下生物多样性最重要的驱动因素之一。在寒冷的半干旱草原上,我们观察到了放牧保护后土壤生物多样性成分的变化。为了研究这些变化,我们在密集放牧区和本研究 20 年前建立的隔离区采集了土壤样本。特别是测量了两个土壤深度(0-5 厘米和 5-10 厘米)的生物多样性成分(如 SSB 和微生物活动)的变化。非度量维度标度显示,移除放牧后,SSB 发生了变化。未放牧地块的 SSB 密度、丰富度和多样性都更高。围栏内 SSB 密度和多样性的增加可能是由于放牧对 SSB 没有直接的不利影响(如践踏和植物消耗),也可能是由于减少了间接影响(如放牧造成的树冠间隙有利于种子发芽)。禁牧对基础呼吸、基质诱导呼吸和脲酶活性的影响非常显著(p < 0.01),这可能是由于禁牧后土壤湿度增加所致。放牧对上层土壤生物参数的影响大于深层土壤。这项研究表明,禁牧是恢复土壤生物多样性的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Restoration Ecology
Restoration Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
15.60%
发文量
226
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Restoration Ecology fosters the exchange of ideas among the many disciplines involved with ecological restoration. Addressing global concerns and communicating them to the international research community and restoration practitioners, the journal is at the forefront of a vital new direction in science, ecology, and policy. Original papers describe experimental, observational, and theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine, and freshwater systems, and are considered without taxonomic bias. Contributions span the natural sciences, including ecological and biological aspects, as well as the restoration of soil, air and water when set in an ecological context; and the social sciences, including cultural, philosophical, political, educational, economic and historical aspects. Edited by a distinguished panel, the journal continues to be a major conduit for researchers to publish their findings in the fight to not only halt ecological damage, but also to ultimately reverse it.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信