Shadi Hazhir, R. Erfanzadeh, Seyed Zanko Pirkhezri, B. Razavi, Péter Török
{"title":"Responses of soil seed banks and soil microbial activity to grazing exclusion in cold semiarid grasslands","authors":"Shadi Hazhir, R. Erfanzadeh, Seyed Zanko Pirkhezri, B. Razavi, Péter Török","doi":"10.1111/rec.14245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The soil seed bank (SSB) and soil microbial communities are among the most crucial drivers of belowground biodiversity in grasslands. Changes in components of soil biodiversity following protection from grazing were observed in cold, semiarid grasslands. To study these changes, soil samples were taken in an intensively grazed area and in an exclosure established 20 years prior to this study. In particular, changes in biodiversity components such as SSB and microbial activities in two soil depths (0–5 and 5–10 cm) were measured. Nonmetric dimensional scaling showed that after grazing removal, the SSB had changed. SSB density, richness, and diversity were higher in the ungrazed plots. The increase in SSB density and diversity in the exclosure may have been caused by the absence of direct adverse effects of grazing on the SSB, like trampling and plant consumption, or by reduced indirect effects, such as seed germination facilitation in canopy gaps created by grazing animals. The effect of grazing removal on basal respiration, substrate‐induced respiration, and urease activity was highly significant (p < 0.01) and may be due to an increase in soil moisture after grazing exclusion. The effect of grazing removal on soil biological parameters was greater in the upper layer than in the deeper soil layer. This study shows that grazing exclusion can be a useful approach in restoring components of soil biodiversity.","PeriodicalId":54487,"journal":{"name":"Restoration Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restoration Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14245","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The soil seed bank (SSB) and soil microbial communities are among the most crucial drivers of belowground biodiversity in grasslands. Changes in components of soil biodiversity following protection from grazing were observed in cold, semiarid grasslands. To study these changes, soil samples were taken in an intensively grazed area and in an exclosure established 20 years prior to this study. In particular, changes in biodiversity components such as SSB and microbial activities in two soil depths (0–5 and 5–10 cm) were measured. Nonmetric dimensional scaling showed that after grazing removal, the SSB had changed. SSB density, richness, and diversity were higher in the ungrazed plots. The increase in SSB density and diversity in the exclosure may have been caused by the absence of direct adverse effects of grazing on the SSB, like trampling and plant consumption, or by reduced indirect effects, such as seed germination facilitation in canopy gaps created by grazing animals. The effect of grazing removal on basal respiration, substrate‐induced respiration, and urease activity was highly significant (p < 0.01) and may be due to an increase in soil moisture after grazing exclusion. The effect of grazing removal on soil biological parameters was greater in the upper layer than in the deeper soil layer. This study shows that grazing exclusion can be a useful approach in restoring components of soil biodiversity.
期刊介绍:
Restoration Ecology fosters the exchange of ideas among the many disciplines involved with ecological restoration. Addressing global concerns and communicating them to the international research community and restoration practitioners, the journal is at the forefront of a vital new direction in science, ecology, and policy. Original papers describe experimental, observational, and theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine, and freshwater systems, and are considered without taxonomic bias. Contributions span the natural sciences, including ecological and biological aspects, as well as the restoration of soil, air and water when set in an ecological context; and the social sciences, including cultural, philosophical, political, educational, economic and historical aspects. Edited by a distinguished panel, the journal continues to be a major conduit for researchers to publish their findings in the fight to not only halt ecological damage, but also to ultimately reverse it.