The effects of lexical densities and task types on Chinese students’ incidental vocabulary acquisition

Zibei Ye
{"title":"The effects of lexical densities and task types on Chinese students’ incidental vocabulary acquisition","authors":"Zibei Ye","doi":"10.54475/jlt.2024.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the effects arose by different lexical densities (2%, 5%) and task types (mind map, continuation task) on Chinese senior high students. Four classes of intermediate-level Chinese EFL learners were randomly assigned to four groups, where the treatment condition for each group includes two variables (group1: 2%+mind map, group2: 5%+mind map, group3: 5%+continuation task, group4: 2%+continuation task). It was found that (1) lexical density (2%, 5%) would not result in a significant difference on incidental vocabulary acquisition; (2) Both tasks would lead to a significant difference on incidental vocabulary acquisition and (3) mind map showed superiority in enhancing receptive vocabulary, productive vocabulary and word retention under the text of 5% of lexical density; (4) 2% of lexical density more facilitated output vocabulary when the continuation task was administered. Pedagogical implications of these results for EFL vocabulary acquisition are discussed.","PeriodicalId":512131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Teaching","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54475/jlt.2024.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the effects arose by different lexical densities (2%, 5%) and task types (mind map, continuation task) on Chinese senior high students. Four classes of intermediate-level Chinese EFL learners were randomly assigned to four groups, where the treatment condition for each group includes two variables (group1: 2%+mind map, group2: 5%+mind map, group3: 5%+continuation task, group4: 2%+continuation task). It was found that (1) lexical density (2%, 5%) would not result in a significant difference on incidental vocabulary acquisition; (2) Both tasks would lead to a significant difference on incidental vocabulary acquisition and (3) mind map showed superiority in enhancing receptive vocabulary, productive vocabulary and word retention under the text of 5% of lexical density; (4) 2% of lexical density more facilitated output vocabulary when the continuation task was administered. Pedagogical implications of these results for EFL vocabulary acquisition are discussed.
词汇密度和任务类型对中国学生附带词汇习得的影响
本研究探讨了不同词汇密度(2%、5%)和任务类型(思维导图、延续任务)对中国高中生的影响。四个班的中级水平汉语 EFL 学习者被随机分配到四组,每组的处理条件包括两个变量(第一组:2%+思维导图;第二组:5%+思维导图;第三组:5%+延续任务;第四组:2%+延续任务)。研究发现:(1) 词汇密度(2%、5%)不会对附带词汇的习得产生显著差异;(2) 两种任务都会对附带词汇的习得产生显著差异;(3) 在词汇密度为 5%的文本中,思维导图在增强接受词汇、生产词汇和单词保持方面表现出优势;(4) 在进行延续任务时,2% 的词汇密度更有利于输出词汇。讨论了这些结果对 EFL 词汇习得的教学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信