The intact and the imperilled: contrasting mammal population trajectories between two large adjacent islands

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
G. Neave, Brett P. Murphy, T. Rangers, Alan N. Andersen, Hugh F. Davies
{"title":"The intact and the imperilled: contrasting mammal population trajectories between two large adjacent islands","authors":"G. Neave, Brett P. Murphy, T. Rangers, Alan N. Andersen, Hugh F. Davies","doi":"10.1071/wr24039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context Native mammals continue to suffer widespread and severe declines across northern Australia’s tropical savannas. There is an increasing body of evidence that the primary driver of these declines is predation by feral cats (Felis catus) and that this is exacerbated by high-severity disturbance regimes (frequent high-intensity fires, and grazing and trampling by exotic megaherbivores) that simplify habitat, thereby increasing hunting efficiency. The large islands off the northern Australian coast – where some threats are either reduced or absent – provide a means of testing the conceptual model’s predictions. Aims To compare the trajectory and distribution of native mammal populations on two large, adjacent islands with markedly different disturbance regimes. Methods In 2020 and 2021, we resurveyed 111 historical sites across the two largest of the Tiwi Islands, Bathurst Island (42 sites) and Melville Island (69 sites) that were previously surveyed between 2000 and 2002. The Melville Island sites had also been resurveyed in 2015. We used the same live trapping method used in 2000–2002, supplemented with camera trapping. Key results On Bathurst Island, feral cats are rare, and we found no significant decrease in native mammal trap success or species richness, and the threatened brush-tailed rabbit-rat (Conilurus penicillatus melibius) appears stable. Conversely, cats occurred at relatively high abundance on Melville Island, and there was a 52% decline in trap success, a 47% reduction in species richness, and a 93% decline in trap success for the brush-tailed rabbit-rat over the 20-year period. The highest decreases in native mammal abundance and richness were in areas that were frequently burnt and had higher activity of feral cats. In contrast, in the absence of cats on Bathurst Island, native mammal abundance increased in frequently burnt areas. Conclusions While Bathurst Island remains one of Australia’s most important refuges for native mammals, neighbouring Melville Island is experiencing severe and ongoing mammal decline. We contend that this pattern primarily reflects the high abundance of cats on Melville Island compared to Bathurst Island. Implications Native mammal decline in northern Australian savannas is associated with abundant feral cats, but the relative contribution of disturbances in driving cat abundance remains less clear. An improved understanding of the constraints to feral cat populations in tropical savannas could enhance conservation management.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/wr24039","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context Native mammals continue to suffer widespread and severe declines across northern Australia’s tropical savannas. There is an increasing body of evidence that the primary driver of these declines is predation by feral cats (Felis catus) and that this is exacerbated by high-severity disturbance regimes (frequent high-intensity fires, and grazing and trampling by exotic megaherbivores) that simplify habitat, thereby increasing hunting efficiency. The large islands off the northern Australian coast – where some threats are either reduced or absent – provide a means of testing the conceptual model’s predictions. Aims To compare the trajectory and distribution of native mammal populations on two large, adjacent islands with markedly different disturbance regimes. Methods In 2020 and 2021, we resurveyed 111 historical sites across the two largest of the Tiwi Islands, Bathurst Island (42 sites) and Melville Island (69 sites) that were previously surveyed between 2000 and 2002. The Melville Island sites had also been resurveyed in 2015. We used the same live trapping method used in 2000–2002, supplemented with camera trapping. Key results On Bathurst Island, feral cats are rare, and we found no significant decrease in native mammal trap success or species richness, and the threatened brush-tailed rabbit-rat (Conilurus penicillatus melibius) appears stable. Conversely, cats occurred at relatively high abundance on Melville Island, and there was a 52% decline in trap success, a 47% reduction in species richness, and a 93% decline in trap success for the brush-tailed rabbit-rat over the 20-year period. The highest decreases in native mammal abundance and richness were in areas that were frequently burnt and had higher activity of feral cats. In contrast, in the absence of cats on Bathurst Island, native mammal abundance increased in frequently burnt areas. Conclusions While Bathurst Island remains one of Australia’s most important refuges for native mammals, neighbouring Melville Island is experiencing severe and ongoing mammal decline. We contend that this pattern primarily reflects the high abundance of cats on Melville Island compared to Bathurst Island. Implications Native mammal decline in northern Australian savannas is associated with abundant feral cats, but the relative contribution of disturbances in driving cat abundance remains less clear. An improved understanding of the constraints to feral cat populations in tropical savannas could enhance conservation management.
完好无损与濒临灭绝:两个相邻大岛哺乳动物种群轨迹的对比
背景 澳大利亚北部热带稀树草原上的本土哺乳动物数量持续广泛而严重地减少。越来越多的证据表明,野猫(Felis catus)的捕食是导致这些动物数量下降的主要原因,而高强度的干扰机制(频繁的高强度火灾、外来大型食草动物的放牧和践踏)简化了栖息地,从而提高了捕猎效率,加剧了这一现象。澳大利亚北部沿海的大型岛屿--那里的一些威胁已经减少或不存在--为检验概念模型的预测提供了一种方法。目的 比较两座相邻的大型岛屿上本土哺乳动物种群的分布轨迹,这两座岛屿的干扰机制明显不同。方法 在2020年和2021年,我们重新调查了蒂维群岛最大的两个岛屿--巴瑟斯特岛(42个地点)和梅尔维尔岛(69个地点)上的111个历史地点。梅尔维尔岛的地点也曾在 2015 年进行过重新调查。我们采用了与 2000-2002 年相同的活体诱捕方法,并辅以相机诱捕。主要结果 在巴瑟斯特岛上,野猫很少见,我们发现本地哺乳动物的诱捕成功率或物种丰富度没有显著下降,濒危刷尾兔鼠(Conilurus penicillatus melibius)似乎也很稳定。相反,猫科动物在梅尔维尔岛的数量相对较高,在这 20 年间,刷尾兔鼠的诱捕成功率下降了 52%,物种丰富度下降了 47%,诱捕成功率下降了 93%。本地哺乳动物丰度和物种丰富度下降幅度最大的地区是经常被烧毁和野猫活动频繁的地区。相反,在巴瑟斯特岛上没有猫的情况下,经常被烧毁的地区的本地哺乳动物数量却有所增加。结论 虽然巴瑟斯特岛仍然是澳大利亚最重要的本地哺乳动物保护区之一,但邻近的梅尔维尔岛却正在经历严重和持续的哺乳动物减少。我们认为,这种模式主要反映了与巴瑟斯特岛相比,梅尔维尔岛上猫科动物的数量较多。启示 澳大利亚北部热带稀树草原中本土哺乳动物的减少与野猫的大量繁殖有关,但干扰对野猫数量的相对影响仍不太清楚。进一步了解热带稀树草原中野猫种群数量的限制因素可加强保护管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信