Let’s Talk About It in the Morning: How Circadian Rhythms Impact Information Sharing on Social Media

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Rob Gleasure, Maylis Saigot, Irfan Kanat
{"title":"Let’s Talk About It in the Morning: How Circadian Rhythms Impact Information Sharing on Social Media","authors":"Rob Gleasure,&nbsp;Maylis Saigot,&nbsp;Irfan Kanat","doi":"10.1007/s42761-024-00254-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigated the role of circadian rhythms in online information sharing. We gathered 416,914 posts from the social media platform X (formerly Twitter). We identified daily patterns of collective positive and negative affect in these posts, consistent with previous research on social media and circadian rhythms. We created predicted values of positive and negative affect for each post, based on the time a post was created. We then used these predicted values for each post to estimate that post’s likelihood of being reshared. We controlled for a range of possible confounders, such as the actual positive and negative affect expressed in a specific post and the number of existing followers and previous posts of the user who created the post, as well as whether the post contained hashtags, mentions, and quotes. The results support a strong relationship between the predicted positive and negative affect of a post—based on circadian patterns of collective positive and negative affect—and the likelihood of a post being shared. We further examine seasonal changes and design a natural experiment, in which we compare patterns of positive and negative affect and information sharing before and after the clocks change, i.e., “spring forward” and “fall back.” The results suggest that these daily collective patterns of positive and negative affect on social media are influenced, at least partly, by hormonal influences and not only collective daily routines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72119,"journal":{"name":"Affective science","volume":"5 4","pages":"389 - 404"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affective science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42761-024-00254-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the role of circadian rhythms in online information sharing. We gathered 416,914 posts from the social media platform X (formerly Twitter). We identified daily patterns of collective positive and negative affect in these posts, consistent with previous research on social media and circadian rhythms. We created predicted values of positive and negative affect for each post, based on the time a post was created. We then used these predicted values for each post to estimate that post’s likelihood of being reshared. We controlled for a range of possible confounders, such as the actual positive and negative affect expressed in a specific post and the number of existing followers and previous posts of the user who created the post, as well as whether the post contained hashtags, mentions, and quotes. The results support a strong relationship between the predicted positive and negative affect of a post—based on circadian patterns of collective positive and negative affect—and the likelihood of a post being shared. We further examine seasonal changes and design a natural experiment, in which we compare patterns of positive and negative affect and information sharing before and after the clocks change, i.e., “spring forward” and “fall back.” The results suggest that these daily collective patterns of positive and negative affect on social media are influenced, at least partly, by hormonal influences and not only collective daily routines.

Abstract Image

早上再说吧:昼夜节律如何影响社交媒体上的信息分享
本研究探讨了昼夜节律在网络信息共享中的作用。我们从社交媒体平台X(以前的Twitter)上收集了416,914条帖子。我们在这些帖子中发现了集体积极和消极影响的日常模式,与之前对社交媒体和昼夜节律的研究一致。我们根据帖子创建的时间,为每个帖子创建了积极和消极影响的预测值。然后,我们使用每个帖子的这些预测值来估计该帖子被转发的可能性。我们控制了一系列可能的混杂因素,例如特定帖子中表达的实际积极和消极影响、创建该帖子的用户的现有关注者数量和以前的帖子数量,以及该帖子是否包含标签、提及和引用。研究结果支持了基于集体积极和消极影响的昼夜节律模式的帖子预测的积极和消极影响与帖子被分享的可能性之间的密切关系。我们进一步研究了季节变化,并设计了一个自然实验,在这个实验中,我们比较了时钟变化前后的积极和消极影响和信息共享模式,即“前进”和“后退”。研究结果表明,这些对社交媒体产生积极和消极影响的日常集体模式,至少在一定程度上受到荷尔蒙的影响,而不仅仅是集体的日常习惯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信