Varun Sabu Sam, Anand Nammalvar, Diana Andrushia, Beulah Gnana Ananthi Gurupatham, Krishanu Roy
{"title":"Flexural Behavior of Galvanized Iron Based Cold-Formed Steel Back-to-Back Built-Up Beams at Elevated Temperatures","authors":"Varun Sabu Sam, Anand Nammalvar, Diana Andrushia, Beulah Gnana Ananthi Gurupatham, Krishanu Roy","doi":"10.3390/buildings14082456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cold-formed steel (CFS) sections have become popular in construction due to several advantages over structural steel. However, research on the performance of galvanized iron (GI)-based CFS under high temperatures, especially regarding its flexural behavior, has been limited. This study extensively investigates how GI-based CFS beams with varying spans behave under elevated temperatures and subsequent cooling using air and water. This study examines the impact of temperature loading and compares the effectiveness of air- and water-cooling methods. Experimental results are validated and analyzed alongside findings from finite element modeling (FEM) using ABAQUS (2019_09_13-23.19.31) and the Direct Strength Method (DSM). Additionally, this study conducts a parametric investigation to assess how beam span influences flexural capacity. Among beams heated to the same temperature, those cooled with water show slightly lower load capacities compared to those cooled with air. The highest load capacity observed is 64.3 kN for the reference specimen, while the lowest is 26.2 kN for the specimen heated for 90 min and cooled with water, a 59.27% difference between them. Stiffness decreases as heating duration increases, with the reference section exhibiting significantly higher stiffness compared to the section heated for 90 min and cooled with water, with a 92.76% difference in stiffness. As heating duration increases, ductility also increases. Various failure modes are observed based on different heating and cooling conditions across different beam spans. This study provides insights into how GI-based CFS beams perform under temperature stress and different cooling scenarios, contributing valuable data for structural design and safety considerations in construction.","PeriodicalId":48546,"journal":{"name":"Buildings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082456","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cold-formed steel (CFS) sections have become popular in construction due to several advantages over structural steel. However, research on the performance of galvanized iron (GI)-based CFS under high temperatures, especially regarding its flexural behavior, has been limited. This study extensively investigates how GI-based CFS beams with varying spans behave under elevated temperatures and subsequent cooling using air and water. This study examines the impact of temperature loading and compares the effectiveness of air- and water-cooling methods. Experimental results are validated and analyzed alongside findings from finite element modeling (FEM) using ABAQUS (2019_09_13-23.19.31) and the Direct Strength Method (DSM). Additionally, this study conducts a parametric investigation to assess how beam span influences flexural capacity. Among beams heated to the same temperature, those cooled with water show slightly lower load capacities compared to those cooled with air. The highest load capacity observed is 64.3 kN for the reference specimen, while the lowest is 26.2 kN for the specimen heated for 90 min and cooled with water, a 59.27% difference between them. Stiffness decreases as heating duration increases, with the reference section exhibiting significantly higher stiffness compared to the section heated for 90 min and cooled with water, with a 92.76% difference in stiffness. As heating duration increases, ductility also increases. Various failure modes are observed based on different heating and cooling conditions across different beam spans. This study provides insights into how GI-based CFS beams perform under temperature stress and different cooling scenarios, contributing valuable data for structural design and safety considerations in construction.
期刊介绍:
BUILDINGS content is primarily staff-written and submitted information is evaluated by the editors for its value to the audience. Such information may be used in articles with appropriate attribution to the source. The editorial staff considers information on the following topics: -Issues directed at building owners and facility managers in North America -Issues relevant to existing buildings, including retrofits, maintenance and modernization -Solution-based content, such as tips and tricks -New construction but only with an eye to issues involving maintenance and operation We generally do not review the following topics because these are not relevant to our readers: -Information on the residential market with the exception of multifamily buildings -International news unrelated to the North American market -Real estate market updates or construction updates