Infrastructure and well-being

Cynthia Myntti
{"title":"Infrastructure and well-being","authors":"Cynthia Myntti","doi":"10.1088/2634-4505/ad6cf0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents the main contours of debates about well-being and the connections between infrastructure, well-being, and sustainability. Broadly distributed well-being is the goal of national governments, and individual well-being represents a desirable positive state beyond physical health. Contemporary definitions of well-being originated in the field of psychology in the 1980s. Psychologists have highlighted three aspects of well-being: cognitive, affective and eudaimonic well-being. The cognitive evaluation of well-being, through the assessment of life satisfaction, is commonly used in large national and international surveys. There is a growing interest in comprehensive approaches to measuring well-being, and its eudaimonic aspect. The second half of the paper examines the relationship between well-being and three key infrastructure topics — mobility, public space and nature contact — by referring to classic and new examples from urban design, the social sciences, and urban restoration ecology. These examples suggest that dimensions of well-being — among them trust, optimism, belonging, delight and empathy — have consequences beyond the individual and are necessary for community commitments to sustainability and environmental justice.","PeriodicalId":309041,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability","volume":"83 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ad6cf0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper presents the main contours of debates about well-being and the connections between infrastructure, well-being, and sustainability. Broadly distributed well-being is the goal of national governments, and individual well-being represents a desirable positive state beyond physical health. Contemporary definitions of well-being originated in the field of psychology in the 1980s. Psychologists have highlighted three aspects of well-being: cognitive, affective and eudaimonic well-being. The cognitive evaluation of well-being, through the assessment of life satisfaction, is commonly used in large national and international surveys. There is a growing interest in comprehensive approaches to measuring well-being, and its eudaimonic aspect. The second half of the paper examines the relationship between well-being and three key infrastructure topics — mobility, public space and nature contact — by referring to classic and new examples from urban design, the social sciences, and urban restoration ecology. These examples suggest that dimensions of well-being — among them trust, optimism, belonging, delight and empathy — have consequences beyond the individual and are necessary for community commitments to sustainability and environmental justice.
基础设施和福祉
本文介绍了有关福祉以及基础设施、福祉和可持续性之间联系的辩论的主要轮廓。广泛分布的福祉是各国政府的目标,而个人福祉则代表了一种超越身体健康的理想积极状态。福祉的当代定义起源于 20 世纪 80 年代的心理学领域。心理学家强调了幸福的三个方面:认知幸福、情感幸福和美满幸福。通过对生活满意度的评估对幸福感进行认知评价,是大型国家和国际调查中常用的方法。人们对衡量幸福感的综合方法及其美满方面的兴趣与日俱增。本文的后半部分通过引用来自城市设计、社会科学和城市恢复生态学的经典和新案例,探讨了幸福感与三个关键基础设施主题--流动性、公共空间和自然接触--之间的关系。这些例子表明,幸福感的各个层面--其中包括信任、乐观、归属感、愉悦和共鸣--的影响超越了个人,是社区致力于可持续发展和环境正义的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信