Assessing state partner use of the Model Aquatic Health Code (MAHC): A cross comparison of five states with varying degrees of self-reported adoption status

Patrick Vander Kelen, Joseph P. Laco, Shannon McClenahan, Christopher Fletcher, Brian Hubbard
{"title":"Assessing state partner use of the Model Aquatic Health Code (MAHC): A cross comparison of five states with varying degrees of self-reported adoption status","authors":"Patrick Vander Kelen, Joseph P. Laco, Shannon McClenahan, Christopher Fletcher, Brian Hubbard","doi":"10.1371/journal.pwat.0000276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the development of the Model Aquatic Health Code (MAHC), U.S. public health departments and aquatics agencies face obstacles in incorporating this guidance into their pool codes. A cross comparison of five state pool codes with the MAHC was conducted to quantify MAHC incorporation into these state codes. The proportion of MAHC code agreement with state codes in this study had a range of 14%–86%. Only 2% of all the MAHC codes available were present in all five state codes, conversely, 12% of the MAHC codes were not found in any state. These differences in code agreement highlight the challenge of measuring MAHC effectiveness at the national level. To improve aquatic safety at a national level, a potential solution is development and use of common core elements in state and local pool codes. Once there is a basis for code comparisons across states, public health programs can investigate whether core MAHC codes result in reduced waterborne illness outbreaks, drowning incidents, injuries from pool chemicals, health outcomes from exposure to disinfection by-products, and swimming-related emergency department visits.","PeriodicalId":93672,"journal":{"name":"PLOS water","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the development of the Model Aquatic Health Code (MAHC), U.S. public health departments and aquatics agencies face obstacles in incorporating this guidance into their pool codes. A cross comparison of five state pool codes with the MAHC was conducted to quantify MAHC incorporation into these state codes. The proportion of MAHC code agreement with state codes in this study had a range of 14%–86%. Only 2% of all the MAHC codes available were present in all five state codes, conversely, 12% of the MAHC codes were not found in any state. These differences in code agreement highlight the challenge of measuring MAHC effectiveness at the national level. To improve aquatic safety at a national level, a potential solution is development and use of common core elements in state and local pool codes. Once there is a basis for code comparisons across states, public health programs can investigate whether core MAHC codes result in reduced waterborne illness outbreaks, drowning incidents, injuries from pool chemicals, health outcomes from exposure to disinfection by-products, and swimming-related emergency department visits.
评估各州合作伙伴对《水产健康示范法规》(MAHC)的使用情况:对五个州不同程度的自报采用情况进行交叉比较
尽管制定了《示范水产健康规范》(MAHC),但美国公共卫生部门和水产机构在将该指南纳入其泳池规范时仍面临障碍。我们对五个州的泳池规范与 MAHC 进行了交叉比较,以量化 MAHC 纳入这些州规范的情况。在这项研究中,MAHC 法规与各州法规一致的比例在 14%-86% 之间。在所有 MAHC 代码中,只有 2% 的代码在所有五个州的代码中都有出现,相反,12% 的 MAHC 代码在任何州都没有出现。这些代码一致性的差异凸显了在全国范围内衡量 MAHC 有效性所面临的挑战。要在全国范围内提高水上安全,一个潜在的解决方案是在各州和地方泳池规范中制定和使用共同的核心要素。一旦有了对各州法规进行比较的基础,公共卫生项目就可以调查主要健康标准的核心法规是否能减少水传播疾病的爆发、溺水事件、泳池化学品造成的伤害、接触消毒副产品造成的健康后果以及与游泳有关的急诊就诊率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信