{"title":"Dynamics of a rocking bridge with two-sided poundings: A shake table investigation","authors":"Ziqi Yang, Yang Lyu, Nawawi Chouw","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>During strong earthquakes, the footing of a rockable bridge can temporarily and partially separate from the support. This rocking motion can activate rigid-like motions, reducing the deformation along the height of bridge piers and leading to smaller bending moments. As a result, rockable footing has been considered as a possibility for low-damage seismic design of structures. For bridges, the seismic-induced interaction between girders and adjacent abutments can change the structural dynamics due to the impeded girder movements. Although bridges with rockable footing, for example, the South Rangitikei viaduct, have been constructed, research on rockable bridges mainly focused on a single-segment case. Physical experiments on rockable bridges considering pounding are very limited. In this work, large-scale shake table experiments were performed on a two-segment bridge model with abutments. The cases without pounding and with girder-girder pounding alone were considered as references to help interpret the results. To investigate the consequence of footing rocking, the results of the rockable bridge on a rigid base were compared to that of the fixed-base bridge. The study reveals that compared to a fixed-base segment, the girder of a rockable segment is easier to move laterally. This change in dynamics due to rocking leads to less maximum pounding forces and thus reduces the damage potential to girders and abutments.</p>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eqe.4205","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4205","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
During strong earthquakes, the footing of a rockable bridge can temporarily and partially separate from the support. This rocking motion can activate rigid-like motions, reducing the deformation along the height of bridge piers and leading to smaller bending moments. As a result, rockable footing has been considered as a possibility for low-damage seismic design of structures. For bridges, the seismic-induced interaction between girders and adjacent abutments can change the structural dynamics due to the impeded girder movements. Although bridges with rockable footing, for example, the South Rangitikei viaduct, have been constructed, research on rockable bridges mainly focused on a single-segment case. Physical experiments on rockable bridges considering pounding are very limited. In this work, large-scale shake table experiments were performed on a two-segment bridge model with abutments. The cases without pounding and with girder-girder pounding alone were considered as references to help interpret the results. To investigate the consequence of footing rocking, the results of the rockable bridge on a rigid base were compared to that of the fixed-base bridge. The study reveals that compared to a fixed-base segment, the girder of a rockable segment is easier to move laterally. This change in dynamics due to rocking leads to less maximum pounding forces and thus reduces the damage potential to girders and abutments.
期刊介绍:
Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following:
ground motions for analysis and design
geotechnical earthquake engineering
probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis
experimental behaviour of structures
seismic protective systems
system identification
risk assessment
seismic code requirements
methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.