Intratumoral Chemotherapy: The Effects of Drug Concentration and Dose Apportioning on Tumor Cell Injury

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
J.S. Warner, C. Kinsey, J. Bates, Vitor Mori
{"title":"Intratumoral Chemotherapy: The Effects of Drug Concentration and Dose Apportioning on Tumor Cell Injury","authors":"J.S. Warner, C. Kinsey, J. Bates, Vitor Mori","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering11080809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The addition of intravenous (i.v.) chemotherapy to i.v. immunotherapy for patients with lung cancer results in improved overall survival but is limited by synergistic side effects and an unknown, highly variable final cytotoxic dose within the tumor. The synergy between i.v. chemo- and immunotherapies is hypothesized to occur as a result of cell injury caused by chemotherapy, a mechanism demonstrated to drive antigen presentation within the tumor microenvironment. Intratumoral delivery of chemotherapy may thus be optimized to maximize tumor cell injury. To assess the balance between the damage versus the death of tumor cells, we developed a computational model of intratumoral dynamics within a lung cancer tumor for three different chemotherapy agents following direct injection as a function of location and number of injection sites. We based the model on the morphology of a lung tumor obtained from a thoracic CT scan. We found no meaningful difference in the extent of tumor cell damage between a centrally injected versus peripherally injected agent, but there were significant differences between a single injection versus when the total dose was apportioned between multiple injection sites. Importantly, we also found that the standard chemotherapeutic concentrations used for intravenous administration were effective at causing cell death but were too high to generate significant cell injury. This suggests that to induce maximal tumor cell injury, the optimal concentration should be several orders of magnitude lower than those typically used for intravenous therapy.","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11080809","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The addition of intravenous (i.v.) chemotherapy to i.v. immunotherapy for patients with lung cancer results in improved overall survival but is limited by synergistic side effects and an unknown, highly variable final cytotoxic dose within the tumor. The synergy between i.v. chemo- and immunotherapies is hypothesized to occur as a result of cell injury caused by chemotherapy, a mechanism demonstrated to drive antigen presentation within the tumor microenvironment. Intratumoral delivery of chemotherapy may thus be optimized to maximize tumor cell injury. To assess the balance between the damage versus the death of tumor cells, we developed a computational model of intratumoral dynamics within a lung cancer tumor for three different chemotherapy agents following direct injection as a function of location and number of injection sites. We based the model on the morphology of a lung tumor obtained from a thoracic CT scan. We found no meaningful difference in the extent of tumor cell damage between a centrally injected versus peripherally injected agent, but there were significant differences between a single injection versus when the total dose was apportioned between multiple injection sites. Importantly, we also found that the standard chemotherapeutic concentrations used for intravenous administration were effective at causing cell death but were too high to generate significant cell injury. This suggests that to induce maximal tumor cell injury, the optimal concentration should be several orders of magnitude lower than those typically used for intravenous therapy.
瘤内化疗:药物浓度和剂量分配对肿瘤细胞损伤的影响
在对肺癌患者进行静脉注射免疫疗法的同时进行静脉注射化疗,可以提高患者的总生存率,但却受到协同副作用和肿瘤内最终细胞毒性剂量未知且变化较大的限制。据推测,静脉化疗与免疫疗法之间的协同作用是化疗造成细胞损伤的结果,而化疗的机制已被证实可推动肿瘤微环境中的抗原呈递。因此,可以优化瘤内化疗给药,使肿瘤细胞损伤最大化。为了评估肿瘤细胞损伤与死亡之间的平衡,我们建立了一个肺癌肿瘤瘤内动力学计算模型,将三种不同化疗药物直接注射后的瘤内动力学作为注射点位置和数量的函数。我们根据胸部 CT 扫描获得的肺部肿瘤形态建立了该模型。我们发现,集中注射与外周注射化疗剂对肿瘤细胞的损伤程度并无明显差异,但单次注射与在多个注射点之间分配总剂量则存在显著差异。重要的是,我们还发现,用于静脉注射的标准化疗浓度能有效导致细胞死亡,但浓度过高则无法产生明显的细胞损伤。这表明,要诱导最大程度的肿瘤细胞损伤,最佳浓度应比通常用于静脉注射的浓度低几个数量级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioengineering
Bioengineering Chemical Engineering-Bioengineering
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.70%
发文量
661
期刊介绍: Aims Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal: ● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings. ● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed. ● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material. ● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds. Scope ● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces ● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices ● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc. ● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology ● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering ● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation ● Translational bioengineering
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信