Effects of Occlusion Cuff Pressures for Determining Brachial Artery Flow-Mediated Dilation in Healthy Thai Adults

Kanpiraya Nithitsuttibuta, Jaruta Kunritt, Suchart Kiatwattanacharoen, Sainatee Pratanaphon
{"title":"Effects of Occlusion Cuff Pressures for Determining Brachial Artery Flow-Mediated Dilation in Healthy Thai Adults","authors":"Kanpiraya Nithitsuttibuta, Jaruta Kunritt, Suchart Kiatwattanacharoen, Sainatee Pratanaphon","doi":"10.12982/nlsc.2024.050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Variability in cuff occlusion pressure used during flow-mediated dilation (FMD) measurement may cause differences in FMD results and discomfort sensation. The objective of this study was to compare FMD data and sensations of pain and numbness using three levels of occlusion cuff pressures commonly used for FMD assessment in healthy adults. A within-subject design was conducted in 12 healthy adults aged 20-40 years. FMD was measured using brachial artery Doppler ultrasound at three different occlusion pressures: 25 and 50 mmHg above systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 200 mmHg. Pain and numbness were recorded using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and the Visual Analog Scale, respectively, at baseline and every minute during the 5-minute occlusion and 3 minutes after cuff deflation. The results showed that %FMD and mean blood flow velocity after using cuff pressure at 25 mmHg above SBP (10.11 ± 2.58% and 11.52 ± 3.96 cm/s) were comparable to those of 50 mmHg above SBP (10.08 ± 2.70% and 12.54 ± 4.31 cm/s) and at 200 mmHg (10.15 ± 2.74% and 12.28 ± 4.30 cm/s) (all P >0.05). The pain intensity was significantly greater at 200 mmHg compared to 25 mmHg at the first, second, and fourth minutes during occlusion (all P <0.05). The numbness scale was not different among the three pressure conditions. In conclusion, the minimum occlusion pressure above SBP by 25 mmHg generated an insignificant FMD response compared to the other two cuff pressures, caused minor pain, and may be the favorable pressure for determining endothelium-dependent FMD in healthy Thai adults.","PeriodicalId":471315,"journal":{"name":"Natural and Life Sciences Communications","volume":"66 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural and Life Sciences Communications","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12982/nlsc.2024.050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Variability in cuff occlusion pressure used during flow-mediated dilation (FMD) measurement may cause differences in FMD results and discomfort sensation. The objective of this study was to compare FMD data and sensations of pain and numbness using three levels of occlusion cuff pressures commonly used for FMD assessment in healthy adults. A within-subject design was conducted in 12 healthy adults aged 20-40 years. FMD was measured using brachial artery Doppler ultrasound at three different occlusion pressures: 25 and 50 mmHg above systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 200 mmHg. Pain and numbness were recorded using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and the Visual Analog Scale, respectively, at baseline and every minute during the 5-minute occlusion and 3 minutes after cuff deflation. The results showed that %FMD and mean blood flow velocity after using cuff pressure at 25 mmHg above SBP (10.11 ± 2.58% and 11.52 ± 3.96 cm/s) were comparable to those of 50 mmHg above SBP (10.08 ± 2.70% and 12.54 ± 4.31 cm/s) and at 200 mmHg (10.15 ± 2.74% and 12.28 ± 4.30 cm/s) (all P >0.05). The pain intensity was significantly greater at 200 mmHg compared to 25 mmHg at the first, second, and fourth minutes during occlusion (all P <0.05). The numbness scale was not different among the three pressure conditions. In conclusion, the minimum occlusion pressure above SBP by 25 mmHg generated an insignificant FMD response compared to the other two cuff pressures, caused minor pain, and may be the favorable pressure for determining endothelium-dependent FMD in healthy Thai adults.
闭塞袖带压力对确定泰国健康成人肱动脉血流介导的扩张的影响
在进行血流介导扩张(FMD)测量时,袖带闭塞压力的不同可能会导致 FMD 结果和不适感觉的差异。本研究的目的是比较健康成年人在使用三种常用于 FMD 评估的闭塞袖带压力时的 FMD 数据以及疼痛和麻木感。该研究对 12 名 20-40 岁的健康成年人进行了受试者内设计。在三种不同的闭塞压力下,使用肱动脉多普勒超声测量了 FMD:分别比收缩压(SBP)高 25 和 50 毫米汞柱以及 200 毫米汞柱。在基线、5 分钟闭塞期间的每分钟以及袖带放气后 3 分钟内,分别使用数字疼痛评分量表和视觉模拟量表记录疼痛和麻木感。结果显示,使用高于 SBP 25 mmHg 的袖带压力后,FMD%和平均血流速度(10.11 ± 2.58% 和 11.52 ± 3.96 cm/s)与高于 SBP 50 mmHg(10.08 ± 2.70% 和 12.54 ± 4.31 cm/s)和 200 mmHg(10.15 ± 2.74% 和 12.28 ± 4.30 cm/s)相当(所有 P 均大于 0.05)。在闭塞过程中的第一、第二和第四分钟,200 mmHg 下的疼痛强度明显高于 25 mmHg 下的疼痛强度(所有 P 均小于 0.05)。麻木量表在三种压力条件下没有差异。总之,与其他两种袖带压力相比,高于 SBP 25 mmHg 的最小闭塞压力产生的 FMD 反应不明显,会引起轻微疼痛,可能是确定健康泰国成年人内皮依赖性 FMD 的有利压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信