Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Local Wound Infiltration for Postoperative Pain Management in Patient Undergoing Total Abdominal Hysterectomy

Q4 Health Professions
Muhammad Arif, Haider Abbas Mandviwala, Syed Wahaj Uddin, Kashif Naeem, Zeeshan Mirza, Aniqa Rehman
{"title":"Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Local Wound Infiltration for Postoperative Pain Management in Patient Undergoing Total Abdominal Hysterectomy","authors":"Muhammad Arif, Haider Abbas Mandviwala, Syed Wahaj Uddin, Kashif Naeem, Zeeshan Mirza, Aniqa Rehman","doi":"10.36570/jduhs.2024.2.2222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the outcomes of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus local wound infiltration (LAI) for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at Dr. Ziauddin Hospital & Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan from December 2023 to May 2024. Female patients aged 18 to 50 years, and scheduled for TAH under general anesthesia were included. Patients were randomly allocated to the TAP group or the LAI group using sealed opaque envelopes. The primary outcome was pain score at different time intervals postoperatively. Pain score measured using the Visual Analogue Scale. Secondary outcomes included total analgesia consumption within 24 hours. Results: Of total 100 patients, the median (IQR) age was 50.0 (47.2-55.0) years. At 8 hours postoperatively, the median pain score was significantly lower in the TAP group 0.0 (0.0-1.0) compared to the LAI group 1.0 (0.0-2.0) (p-value <0.001). Similarly, at 12 hours, the TAP group reported a median pain score of 2.0 (1.0-2.0), significantly lower than the LAI group 3.0 (2.0-4.0) (p-value <0.001). At 24 hours, the median pain score remained significantly lower in the TAP group 50.0 (50.0-70.0) compared to the LAI group 130.0 (120.0-140.0) (p-value <0.001). Total analgesia consumption was also significantly lower in TAP group as compared to LAI group i.e., 50.0 (50.0-70.0) vs. 130.0 (120.0-140.0) (p-value <0.001). Conclusion: The TAP block provided superior postoperative pain control compared to LAI in patients undergoing TAH, evidenced by lower pain scores and reduced analgesia consumption. Keywords: Analgesia, Hysterectomy, Postoperative Pain, Visual Analogue Scale","PeriodicalId":34119,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences","volume":"2 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36570/jduhs.2024.2.2222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the outcomes of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus local wound infiltration (LAI) for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at Dr. Ziauddin Hospital & Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan from December 2023 to May 2024. Female patients aged 18 to 50 years, and scheduled for TAH under general anesthesia were included. Patients were randomly allocated to the TAP group or the LAI group using sealed opaque envelopes. The primary outcome was pain score at different time intervals postoperatively. Pain score measured using the Visual Analogue Scale. Secondary outcomes included total analgesia consumption within 24 hours. Results: Of total 100 patients, the median (IQR) age was 50.0 (47.2-55.0) years. At 8 hours postoperatively, the median pain score was significantly lower in the TAP group 0.0 (0.0-1.0) compared to the LAI group 1.0 (0.0-2.0) (p-value <0.001). Similarly, at 12 hours, the TAP group reported a median pain score of 2.0 (1.0-2.0), significantly lower than the LAI group 3.0 (2.0-4.0) (p-value <0.001). At 24 hours, the median pain score remained significantly lower in the TAP group 50.0 (50.0-70.0) compared to the LAI group 130.0 (120.0-140.0) (p-value <0.001). Total analgesia consumption was also significantly lower in TAP group as compared to LAI group i.e., 50.0 (50.0-70.0) vs. 130.0 (120.0-140.0) (p-value <0.001). Conclusion: The TAP block provided superior postoperative pain control compared to LAI in patients undergoing TAH, evidenced by lower pain scores and reduced analgesia consumption. Keywords: Analgesia, Hysterectomy, Postoperative Pain, Visual Analogue Scale
腹横肌平面阻滞与局部伤口浸润治疗全腹子宫切除术患者术后疼痛
目的比较腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞与局部伤口浸润(LAI)用于全腹子宫切除术(TAH)患者术后镇痛的效果。方法:这项随机对照试验于 2023 年 12 月至 2024 年 5 月在巴基斯坦卡拉奇的齐亚乌丁博士医院和医学院进行。研究对象包括年龄在 18 至 50 岁之间、计划在全身麻醉下进行 TAH 手术的女性患者。使用密封的不透明信封将患者随机分配到TAP组或LAI组。主要结果是术后不同时间间隔的疼痛评分。疼痛评分采用视觉模拟量表测量。次要结果包括 24 小时内的镇痛剂总用量。结果:在总共 100 名患者中,年龄中位数(IQR)为 50.0(47.2-55.0)岁。术后 8 小时,TAP 组的疼痛评分中位数为 0.0(0.0-1.0),明显低于 LAI 组的 1.0(0.0-2.0)(P 值<0.001)。同样,12 小时后,TAP 组的疼痛中位数为 2.0(1.0-2.0),明显低于 LAI 组的 3.0(2.0-4.0)(P 值 <0.001)。24 小时后,TAP 组的疼痛评分中位数仍为 50.0(50.0-70.0),明显低于 LAI 组的 130.0(120.0-140.0)(P 值<0.001)。与 LAI 组相比,TAP 组的镇痛剂总用量也明显较低,即 50.0(50.0-70.0)vs 130.0(120.0-140.0)(p 值 <0.001)。结论在接受 TAH 手术的患者中,TAP 阻滞的术后疼痛控制效果优于 LAI,表现为疼痛评分较低,镇痛剂用量减少。关键词镇痛 子宫切除术 术后疼痛 视觉模拟量表
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences
Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信