Clinical outcomes for pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma patients

IF 2.4 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jared Sullivan, James P. Chandler, Maciej S. Lesniak, Matthew C. Tate, A. Sonabend, John A Kalapurakal, Craig Horbinski, R. Lukas, Priya Kumthekar, S. Sachdev
{"title":"Clinical outcomes for pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma patients","authors":"Jared Sullivan, James P. Chandler, Maciej S. Lesniak, Matthew C. Tate, A. Sonabend, John A Kalapurakal, Craig Horbinski, R. Lukas, Priya Kumthekar, S. Sachdev","doi":"10.1093/nop/npae074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Report our institutional experience with pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) to contribute to limited data on optimal management.\n \n \n \n Patients with pathologically confirmed PXA treated at our institution between 1990 and 2019 were identified. Demographic information, tumor grade, treatment variables, and clinical outcomes were collected from patient charts. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to summarize two primary outcome measurements: progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Outcomes were stratified by tumor grade and extent of resection. Cox regression and log-rank testing were performed.\n \n \n \n We identified 17 patients with pathologically confirmed PXA. Two patients were excluded due to incomplete treatment information or <6m of follow-up; 15 patients were analyzed (median follow-up 4.4y). Six patients had grade 2 PXA and 9 had grade 3 anaplastic PXA. The 2-year and 5-year PFS for the cohort was 57% and 33%, respectively; 2-year and 5-year OS was 93% and 75%, respectively. Patients with grade 2 tumors exhibited superior PFS compared to those with grade 3 tumors (2-year PFS: 100% vs. 28%, 5-year PFS: 60% vs. 14%), hazard ratio, 5.09 (95% CI: 1.06-24.50), p = 0.02. Undergoing a GTR was associated with numerical longer survival but this was not of statistical significance (hazard ratio: 0.38, p = 0.15). All but one (89%) of the grade 3 patients underwent RT.\n \n \n \n The poor survival of the cohort, especially with grade 3 tumors, suggests the need for more aggressive treatment, including maximal resection followed by intensive adjuvant therapy. Better prognostics of tumor recurrence are needed to guide the use of adjuvant therapy.\n","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npae074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Report our institutional experience with pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) to contribute to limited data on optimal management. Patients with pathologically confirmed PXA treated at our institution between 1990 and 2019 were identified. Demographic information, tumor grade, treatment variables, and clinical outcomes were collected from patient charts. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to summarize two primary outcome measurements: progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Outcomes were stratified by tumor grade and extent of resection. Cox regression and log-rank testing were performed. We identified 17 patients with pathologically confirmed PXA. Two patients were excluded due to incomplete treatment information or <6m of follow-up; 15 patients were analyzed (median follow-up 4.4y). Six patients had grade 2 PXA and 9 had grade 3 anaplastic PXA. The 2-year and 5-year PFS for the cohort was 57% and 33%, respectively; 2-year and 5-year OS was 93% and 75%, respectively. Patients with grade 2 tumors exhibited superior PFS compared to those with grade 3 tumors (2-year PFS: 100% vs. 28%, 5-year PFS: 60% vs. 14%), hazard ratio, 5.09 (95% CI: 1.06-24.50), p = 0.02. Undergoing a GTR was associated with numerical longer survival but this was not of statistical significance (hazard ratio: 0.38, p = 0.15). All but one (89%) of the grade 3 patients underwent RT. The poor survival of the cohort, especially with grade 3 tumors, suggests the need for more aggressive treatment, including maximal resection followed by intensive adjuvant therapy. Better prognostics of tumor recurrence are needed to guide the use of adjuvant therapy.
多形性黄细胞瘤患者的临床疗效
报告本院治疗多形性黄细胞瘤(PXA)的经验,为有限的最佳治疗数据做出贡献。 我们对 1990 年至 2019 年期间在本院接受病理确诊的 PXA 患者进行了鉴定。从患者病历中收集了人口统计学信息、肿瘤分级、治疗变量和临床结果。卡普兰-梅耶估计值用于总结两个主要结局指标:无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果按肿瘤分级和切除范围进行分层。进行了 Cox 回归和对数秩检验。 我们发现了 17 例经病理证实的 PXA 患者。有两名患者因治疗信息不全或随访时间少于6米而被排除在外;15名患者接受了分析(中位随访时间为4.4年)。6名患者为2级PXA,9名患者为3级无细胞PXA。组群的2年和5年PFS分别为57%和33%;2年和5年OS分别为93%和75%。2级肿瘤患者的PFS优于3级肿瘤患者(2年PFS:100% vs. 28%,5年PFS:60% vs. 14%),危险比为5.09(95% CI:1.06-24.50),P = 0.02。接受 GTR 与数字生存期延长有关,但无统计学意义(危险比:0.38,P = 0.15)。除一名患者(89%)外,所有 3 级患者都接受了 RT 治疗。 该组患者的生存率较低,尤其是3级肿瘤患者,这表明需要进行更积极的治疗,包括最大限度切除肿瘤,然后进行强化辅助治疗。需要更好的肿瘤复发预后来指导辅助治疗的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuro-oncology practice
Neuro-oncology practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Neuro-Oncology Practice focuses on the clinical aspects of the subspecialty for practicing clinicians and healthcare specialists from a variety of disciplines including physicians, nurses, physical/occupational therapists, neuropsychologists, and palliative care specialists, who have focused their careers on clinical patient care and who want to apply the latest treatment advances to their practice. These include: Applying new trial results to improve standards of patient care Translating scientific advances such as tumor molecular profiling and advanced imaging into clinical treatment decision making and personalized brain tumor therapies Raising awareness of basic, translational and clinical research in areas of symptom management, survivorship, neurocognitive function, end of life issues and caregiving
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信