Objectivity in a Subjective Field: The Current State and Future Directions of “Objective” Diagnostics in Psychiatry

Q4 Health Professions
Adith V Ram, Eric A. Storch
{"title":"Objectivity in a Subjective Field: The Current State and Future Directions of “Objective” Diagnostics in Psychiatry","authors":"Adith V Ram, Eric A. Storch","doi":"10.36570/jduhs.2024.2.2242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even in its most evidence-based practice, medicine is often an inherently subjective field, both in terms of self-reported symptoms on the patient side and clinical reasoning on the provider side. There is arguably no area of medicine as subjective as psychiatry, a specialty which often focuses on emotions, experiences, and realities that are difficult to quantify or “objectively” analyze. Historically, this subjectivity limited progress and treatment options in psychiatry in many ways. Until the mid-20th century, psychiatry was rooted in anecdotal cases within institutions, followed by a largely psychoanalytic framework supported by evidence which was tenuous at best.","PeriodicalId":34119,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36570/jduhs.2024.2.2242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Even in its most evidence-based practice, medicine is often an inherently subjective field, both in terms of self-reported symptoms on the patient side and clinical reasoning on the provider side. There is arguably no area of medicine as subjective as psychiatry, a specialty which often focuses on emotions, experiences, and realities that are difficult to quantify or “objectively” analyze. Historically, this subjectivity limited progress and treatment options in psychiatry in many ways. Until the mid-20th century, psychiatry was rooted in anecdotal cases within institutions, followed by a largely psychoanalytic framework supported by evidence which was tenuous at best.
主观领域的客观性:精神病学 "客观 "诊断的现状和未来方向
即使在最循证的实践中,医学也往往是一个固有的主观领域,无论是从患者方面自我报告的症状,还是从提供者方面的临床推理来看,都是如此。可以说,没有哪个医学领域能像精神病学这样主观,这个专业通常关注的是难以量化或 "客观 "分析的情感、经历和现实。从历史上看,这种主观性在很多方面限制了精神病学的进步和治疗方案的选择。直到 20 世纪中叶,精神病学一直植根于机构内的轶事病例,其次是主要由证据支持的精神分析框架,而这些证据充其量也是脆弱的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences
Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信