The Effectiveness of Summary Writing Strategy with Bloom Taxonomy Questions

Atika Kumala Dewi, B. Cahyono, Nanang Zubaidi
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Summary Writing Strategy with Bloom Taxonomy Questions","authors":"Atika Kumala Dewi, B. Cahyono, Nanang Zubaidi","doi":"10.31849/lectura.v15i2.20257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"English as a Foreign Language (EFL) evolves to include reading, writing, listening, and speaking. Writing is crucial in higher education for academic report preparation and final project requirements by developing a proper summary. However, there is a lack of research on enhancing summary writing skill in EFL contexts. The Bloom taxonomy model can help to develop students' cognitive analysis. Therefore, this study aims to examine the difference in summary writing skills among EFL students taught using Bloom taxonomy questions. To achieve this aim, a quasi-experimental method was employed by two groups: an experiment group and a control group. The experimental group was taught summary writing strategies using Bloom taxonomy questions, while the control group received a control group. Both groups were given a pre-test and a post-test before and after the treatment. The results showed that the pre-test scores and post-test scores were similar between the experimental and control groups. However, the paired sample t-test showed a significant difference between pre-test and post-test scores in the experimental group, indicating a significant increase in results. The study provided valuable insights into the effectiveness of different treatment methods in improving students' summary writing skills. In conclusion, the study shows that Bloom taxonomy questions can significantly enhance students' summary writing skills, as they are more attractive, hierarchical, and cognitively domain-specific than conventional teaching methods. The experimental group achieved higher mean scores. The results suggest that EFL teachers should select appropriate source texts and future research should consider locations and subjects.","PeriodicalId":517109,"journal":{"name":"Lectura : Jurnal Pendidikan","volume":"2 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lectura : Jurnal Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31849/lectura.v15i2.20257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

English as a Foreign Language (EFL) evolves to include reading, writing, listening, and speaking. Writing is crucial in higher education for academic report preparation and final project requirements by developing a proper summary. However, there is a lack of research on enhancing summary writing skill in EFL contexts. The Bloom taxonomy model can help to develop students' cognitive analysis. Therefore, this study aims to examine the difference in summary writing skills among EFL students taught using Bloom taxonomy questions. To achieve this aim, a quasi-experimental method was employed by two groups: an experiment group and a control group. The experimental group was taught summary writing strategies using Bloom taxonomy questions, while the control group received a control group. Both groups were given a pre-test and a post-test before and after the treatment. The results showed that the pre-test scores and post-test scores were similar between the experimental and control groups. However, the paired sample t-test showed a significant difference between pre-test and post-test scores in the experimental group, indicating a significant increase in results. The study provided valuable insights into the effectiveness of different treatment methods in improving students' summary writing skills. In conclusion, the study shows that Bloom taxonomy questions can significantly enhance students' summary writing skills, as they are more attractive, hierarchical, and cognitively domain-specific than conventional teaching methods. The experimental group achieved higher mean scores. The results suggest that EFL teachers should select appropriate source texts and future research should consider locations and subjects.
使用布鲁姆分类学问题的摘要写作策略的有效性
英语作为外语(EFL)的发展包括阅读、写作、听力和口语。在高等教育中,通过编写适当的摘要来准备学术报告和最终项目要求,写作至关重要。然而,目前还缺乏在 EFL 环境中提高摘要写作技巧的研究。布鲁姆分类法模型有助于培养学生的认知分析能力。因此,本研究旨在考察使用布鲁姆分类法问题教学的 EFL 学生在摘要写作技能方面的差异。为实现这一目标,本研究采用了准实验法,分为两组:实验组和对照组。实验组教授使用布鲁姆分类法问题的摘要写作策略,而对照组则接受对照组的教授。两组学生分别在治疗前后接受了前测和后测。结果显示,实验组和对照组的前测成绩和后测成绩相似。然而,配对样本 t 检验显示,实验组的前测和后测分数有显著差异,表明实验组的成绩有明显提高。该研究为不同处理方法在提高学生摘要写作能力方面的有效性提供了有价值的启示。总之,本研究表明,布卢姆分类法试题比传统教学方法更具吸引力、层次性和认知领域针对性,因此能显著提高学生的摘要写作能力。实验组的平均得分更高。研究结果表明,EFL 教师应选择适当的源文本,未来的研究应考虑地点和主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信