‘Workers using foodbanks’: the embedding of food insecurity at the nexus of welfare and employment laws

L.J.B. Hayes, Naomi Maynard
{"title":"‘Workers using foodbanks’: the embedding of food insecurity at the nexus of welfare and employment laws","authors":"L.J.B. Hayes, Naomi Maynard","doi":"10.1332/17598273y2024d000000026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this first UK study of ‘Workers using foodbanks’, 65 per cent of research participants, including 76 per cent of those of working age, identified poor-quality employment as the root cause of their food insecurity. This primary problem of the deficient quality of jobs was characterised by insecure work, low wages, and excessive mental stress. Data revealed an environment in which workers are required to claim benefits because available employment cannot sustain their needs. A contemporary generation of ‘in-and-out-of-work[ers]’ are food insecure because of a secondary problem of inadequate welfare support. Post-pandemic welfare laws are interacting with ineffective employment rights protection to scaffold a low-wage labour market in which jobs are stripped of qualities that meet workers’ basic needs. There is an urgent need to respond to the UKs record high incidence of food insecurity by improving the quality of available employment so that all jobs deliver adequate income, security of working arrangements, and support for good mental and physical health. ‘Workers using foodbanks’ is an aphorism that captures a contemporary reality in which the risk of food insecurity is embedded in contractual arrangements for work that are forged at the nexus of welfare and employment laws.","PeriodicalId":505062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Poverty and Social Justice","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Poverty and Social Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/17598273y2024d000000026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this first UK study of ‘Workers using foodbanks’, 65 per cent of research participants, including 76 per cent of those of working age, identified poor-quality employment as the root cause of their food insecurity. This primary problem of the deficient quality of jobs was characterised by insecure work, low wages, and excessive mental stress. Data revealed an environment in which workers are required to claim benefits because available employment cannot sustain their needs. A contemporary generation of ‘in-and-out-of-work[ers]’ are food insecure because of a secondary problem of inadequate welfare support. Post-pandemic welfare laws are interacting with ineffective employment rights protection to scaffold a low-wage labour market in which jobs are stripped of qualities that meet workers’ basic needs. There is an urgent need to respond to the UKs record high incidence of food insecurity by improving the quality of available employment so that all jobs deliver adequate income, security of working arrangements, and support for good mental and physical health. ‘Workers using foodbanks’ is an aphorism that captures a contemporary reality in which the risk of food insecurity is embedded in contractual arrangements for work that are forged at the nexus of welfare and employment laws.
使用食物银行的工人":福利法与就业法之间的粮食不安全问题
在英国首次对 "使用粮食银行的工人 "进行的研究中,65% 的研究参与者,包括 76% 的工作年龄段的人,认为工作质量差是造成他们粮食不安全的根本原因。工作不稳定、工资低和精神压力过大是工作质量不高的主要问题。数据显示,在这种环境下,工人因现有工作无法满足其需求而必须申请福利。当代的 "在业和失业者 "由于福利支持不足这一次要问题而缺乏粮食安全。流行病后的福利法与无效的就业权利保护相互作用,形成了一个低工资劳动力市场,其中的工作被剥夺了满足工人基本需求的品质。当务之急是提高就业质量,使所有工作都能提供充足的收入、安全的工作安排以及对良好身心健康的支持,从而应对英国创纪录的高粮食不安全率。工人使用食物银行 "这句谚语反映了当代的现实情况,即粮食无保障的风险已嵌入工作合同安排中,而这些工作合同安排是在福利法和就业法的结合点上形成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信