Simon Schröer , Daniel Düx , Josef Joaquin Löning Caballero , Julian Glandorf , Thomas Gerlach , Dominik Horstmann , Othmar Belker , Moritz Gutt , Frank Wacker , Oliver Speck , Bennet Hensen , Marcel Gutberlet
{"title":"Reducing electromagnetic interference in MR thermometry: A comparison of setup configurations for MR-guided microwave ablations","authors":"Simon Schröer , Daniel Düx , Josef Joaquin Löning Caballero , Julian Glandorf , Thomas Gerlach , Dominik Horstmann , Othmar Belker , Moritz Gutt , Frank Wacker , Oliver Speck , Bennet Hensen , Marcel Gutberlet","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2024.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Magnetic Resonance (MR) thermometry is used for the monitoring of MR-guided microwave ablations (MWA), and for the intraoperative evaluation of ablation regions. Nevertheless, the accuracy of temperature mapping may be compromised by electromagnetic interference emanating from the microwave (MW) generator. This study evaluated different setups for improving magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during MWA with a modified MW generator.</div><div>MWA was performed in 15 gel phantoms comparing three setups: The MW generator was placed outside the MR scanner room, either connected to the MW applicator using a penetration panel with a radiofrequency (RF) filter and a 7 m coaxial cable (Setup 1), or through a waveguide using a 5 m coaxial cable (Setup 2). Setup 3 employed the MW generator within the MR scan room, connected by a 5 m coaxial cable. The coaxial cables in setups 2 and 3 were modified with custom shielding to reduce interference. The setups during ablation (active setup) were compared to a reference setup without the presence of the MW system. Thermometry and thermal dose maps (CEM43 model) were compared for the three configurations. Primary endpoints for assessment were signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), temperature precision, Sørensen-Dice-Coefficient (DSC), and RF-noise spectra.</div><div>Setup 3 showed highly significant electromagnetic interference during ablation with a SNR decrease by −60.4%±13.5% (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo><</mo><mn>0.001</mn></mrow></math></span>) compared to reference imaging. For setup 1 and setup 2 no significant decrease in SNR was measured with differences of −2.9%±9.8% (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.6</mn></mrow></math></span>) and −1.5%±12.8% (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.8</mn></mrow></math></span>), respectively. SNR differences were significant between active setups 1 and 3 with −51.2%±16.1% (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo><</mo><mn>0.001</mn></mrow></math></span>) and between active setups 2 and 3 with −59.0%±15.5% (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo><</mo><mn>0.001</mn></mrow></math></span>) but not significant between active setups 1 and 2 with 19.0%±13.7% (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.09</mn></mrow></math></span>). Furthermore, no significant differences were seen in temperature precision or DSCs between all setups, ranging from 0.33 °C ± 0.04 °C (Setup 1) to 0.38 °C ± 0.06 °C (Setup 3) (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.6</mn></mrow></math></span>) and from 87.0%±1.6% (Setup 3) to 88.1%±1.6% (Setup 2) (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.58</mn></mrow></math></span>), respectively.</div><div>Both setups (1 and 2) with the MW generator outside the MR scanner room were beneficial to reduce electromagnetic interference during MWA. Moreover, provided that a shielded cable is utilized in setups 2 and 3, all configurations displayed negligible differences in temperature precision and DSCs, indicating that the location of the MW generator does not significantly impact the accuracy of thermometry during MWA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"35 1","pages":"Pages 59-68"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388924000552","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Magnetic Resonance (MR) thermometry is used for the monitoring of MR-guided microwave ablations (MWA), and for the intraoperative evaluation of ablation regions. Nevertheless, the accuracy of temperature mapping may be compromised by electromagnetic interference emanating from the microwave (MW) generator. This study evaluated different setups for improving magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during MWA with a modified MW generator.
MWA was performed in 15 gel phantoms comparing three setups: The MW generator was placed outside the MR scanner room, either connected to the MW applicator using a penetration panel with a radiofrequency (RF) filter and a 7 m coaxial cable (Setup 1), or through a waveguide using a 5 m coaxial cable (Setup 2). Setup 3 employed the MW generator within the MR scan room, connected by a 5 m coaxial cable. The coaxial cables in setups 2 and 3 were modified with custom shielding to reduce interference. The setups during ablation (active setup) were compared to a reference setup without the presence of the MW system. Thermometry and thermal dose maps (CEM43 model) were compared for the three configurations. Primary endpoints for assessment were signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), temperature precision, Sørensen-Dice-Coefficient (DSC), and RF-noise spectra.
Setup 3 showed highly significant electromagnetic interference during ablation with a SNR decrease by −60.4%±13.5% () compared to reference imaging. For setup 1 and setup 2 no significant decrease in SNR was measured with differences of −2.9%±9.8% () and −1.5%±12.8% (), respectively. SNR differences were significant between active setups 1 and 3 with −51.2%±16.1% () and between active setups 2 and 3 with −59.0%±15.5% () but not significant between active setups 1 and 2 with 19.0%±13.7% (). Furthermore, no significant differences were seen in temperature precision or DSCs between all setups, ranging from 0.33 °C ± 0.04 °C (Setup 1) to 0.38 °C ± 0.06 °C (Setup 3) () and from 87.0%±1.6% (Setup 3) to 88.1%±1.6% (Setup 2) (), respectively.
Both setups (1 and 2) with the MW generator outside the MR scanner room were beneficial to reduce electromagnetic interference during MWA. Moreover, provided that a shielded cable is utilized in setups 2 and 3, all configurations displayed negligible differences in temperature precision and DSCs, indicating that the location of the MW generator does not significantly impact the accuracy of thermometry during MWA.
期刊介绍:
Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik (Journal of Medical Physics) is an official organ of the German and Austrian Society of Medical Physic and the Swiss Society of Radiobiology and Medical Physics.The Journal is a platform for basic research and practical applications of physical procedures in medical diagnostics and therapy. The articles are reviewed following international standards of peer reviewing.
Focuses of the articles are:
-Biophysical methods in radiation therapy and nuclear medicine
-Dosimetry and radiation protection
-Radiological diagnostics and quality assurance
-Modern imaging techniques, such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography
-Ultrasonography diagnostics, application of laser and UV rays
-Electronic processing of biosignals
-Artificial intelligence and machine learning in medical physics
In the Journal, the latest scientific insights find their expression in the form of original articles, reviews, technical communications, and information for the clinical practice.