The Audiological Profile and Rehabilitation of Patients with Incomplete Partition Type II and Large Vestibular Aqueducts.

Beyza Demirtaş, Merve Özbal Batuk, Hilal Dinçer D'Alessandro, Gonca Sennaroğlu
{"title":"The Audiological Profile and Rehabilitation of Patients with Incomplete Partition Type II and Large Vestibular Aqueducts.","authors":"Beyza Demirtaş, Merve Özbal Batuk, Hilal Dinçer D'Alessandro, Gonca Sennaroğlu","doi":"10.5152/iao.2024.231372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Incomplete partition type II (IP-II) malformation is often accompanied by a large vestibular aqueduct (LVA). In IP anomalies, the patient's auditory rehabilitation requirements are decided according to the presence of inner ear structures and the degree of hearing loss (HL). There has been limited research on auditory rehabilitation (AR) requirement selection in patients diagnosed with IP-II and LVA. This study investigated the typical characteristics of HL and AR choices in patients diagnosed with IP-II and LVA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Patients with IP-II and LVA (n=55; 25 women and 30 men) were identified, and audiological evaluations were performed. The patient's demographic characteristics, the type and degree of HL, the AR method, age at diagnosis, and educational status were retrospectively compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The distribution of our 55 patients according to cochlear implants, hearing aids (HA), and bimodal applications was 29.1% (n=16), 43.6% (n=24), and 27.3% (n=15), respectively. Statistical analyses using chi-square tests found no significant differences in the incidence of dizziness/imbalance, tinnitus, HL progression, or the degree and onset of HL among the patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The data revealed different audiological characteristics among patients with IP-II and LVA, as well as different AR solutions. The most widely used AR modality was found to be HA. Prediction of sudden versus progressive HL development among patients is challenging, and the characteristics of IP-II vary. Therefore, they should be interpreted with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":94238,"journal":{"name":"The journal of international advanced otology","volume":"20 3","pages":"196-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232082/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of international advanced otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2024.231372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Incomplete partition type II (IP-II) malformation is often accompanied by a large vestibular aqueduct (LVA). In IP anomalies, the patient's auditory rehabilitation requirements are decided according to the presence of inner ear structures and the degree of hearing loss (HL). There has been limited research on auditory rehabilitation (AR) requirement selection in patients diagnosed with IP-II and LVA. This study investigated the typical characteristics of HL and AR choices in patients diagnosed with IP-II and LVA.

Methods:  Patients with IP-II and LVA (n=55; 25 women and 30 men) were identified, and audiological evaluations were performed. The patient's demographic characteristics, the type and degree of HL, the AR method, age at diagnosis, and educational status were retrospectively compared.

Results:  The distribution of our 55 patients according to cochlear implants, hearing aids (HA), and bimodal applications was 29.1% (n=16), 43.6% (n=24), and 27.3% (n=15), respectively. Statistical analyses using chi-square tests found no significant differences in the incidence of dizziness/imbalance, tinnitus, HL progression, or the degree and onset of HL among the patients.

Conclusion:  The data revealed different audiological characteristics among patients with IP-II and LVA, as well as different AR solutions. The most widely used AR modality was found to be HA. Prediction of sudden versus progressive HL development among patients is challenging, and the characteristics of IP-II vary. Therefore, they should be interpreted with caution.

不完全分区 II 型和大前庭导水管患者的听力学特征和康复治疗。
背景: 不完全分隔Ⅱ型(IP-Ⅱ)畸形通常伴有大前庭导水管(LVA)。在 IP畸形中,患者的听觉康复要求是根据内耳结构的存在和听力损失(HL)的程度来决定的。目前,有关确诊为 IP-II 和 LVA 患者的听觉康复(AR)需求选择的研究还很有限。本研究调查了被诊断为 IP-II 和 LVA 患者的 HL 和 AR 选择的典型特征: 确定了 IP-II 和 LVA 患者(n=55;25 名女性和 30 名男性),并进行了听力评估。对患者的人口统计学特征、HL 的类型和程度、AR 方法、诊断时的年龄和教育状况进行了回顾性比较: 55名患者中,人工耳蜗、助听器(HA)和双模应用的比例分别为29.1%(16人)、43.6%(24人)和27.3%(15人)。使用卡方检验进行统计分析后发现,患者在眩晕/不平衡、耳鸣、HL进展、HL程度和发病方面没有显著差异: 数据显示,IP-II 和 LVA 患者的听觉特征不同,AR 解决方案也不同。结论:数据显示,IP-II 和 LVA 患者有不同的听力学特征,也有不同的 AR 解决方案,其中使用最广泛的 AR 模式是 HA。预测患者中HL的突然发展还是渐进发展具有挑战性,而且IP-II的特征也各不相同。因此,应谨慎解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信