The Sensitivity of the Mini-Mental State Examination to Detect Objective Cognitive Side Effects Induced by Electroconvulsive Therapy: Results From the Dutch ECT Consortium.

Dore Loef, Philip F P van Eijndhoven, Sigfried N T M Schouws, Arjen J C Slooter, Nikki Janssen, Rob M Kok, Bart P F Rutten, Eric van Exel, Didi Rhebergen, Mardien L Oudega, Roel J T Mocking, Indira Tendolkar, Annemiek Dols, Esmée Verwijk
{"title":"The Sensitivity of the Mini-Mental State Examination to Detect Objective Cognitive Side Effects Induced by Electroconvulsive Therapy: Results From the Dutch ECT Consortium.","authors":"Dore Loef, Philip F P van Eijndhoven, Sigfried N T M Schouws, Arjen J C Slooter, Nikki Janssen, Rob M Kok, Bart P F Rutten, Eric van Exel, Didi Rhebergen, Mardien L Oudega, Roel J T Mocking, Indira Tendolkar, Annemiek Dols, Esmée Verwijk","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Monitoring cognitive side effects following electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is crucial for balancing side effects and clinical effectiveness. Yet, evidence-based guidelines on cognitive testing following ECT are lacking. A frequently used test in global ECT practice is the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). We examined the change of the MMSE score and its performance in identifying a decline in predefined neuropsychological measures sensitive to ECT-induced cognitive changes: verbal recall and verbal fluency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mean MMSE scores before and 1 week after ECT were compared using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. The Reliable Change Index was calculated for all cognitive measures to indicate whether a participant's change in score from pre- to post-ECT was considered statistically significant. The sensitivity and specificity of the MMSE were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 426 patients with depression from 5 sites were included from the Dutch ECT Consortium. Mean (SD) MMSE score increased significantly from 26.2 (3.9) before ECT to 26.8 (3.8) after ECT (p = .002). After ECT, 36 patients (8.5%) showed a significant decline in MMSE score. The sensitivity of the MMSE in identifying patients who experienced a significant decline in verbal recall or verbal fluency ranged from 3.6% to 11.1%. The specificity of the MMSE in identifying patients who did not experience a significant decline in verbal recall or verbal fluency ranged from 95.6% to 96.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the very low sensitivity of the MMSE, we propose reconsidering the prominence of the MMSE in ECT practice and cognitive monitoring guidelines, advocating for a more comprehensive approach to assess ECT-induced cognitive changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.08.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Monitoring cognitive side effects following electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is crucial for balancing side effects and clinical effectiveness. Yet, evidence-based guidelines on cognitive testing following ECT are lacking. A frequently used test in global ECT practice is the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). We examined the change of the MMSE score and its performance in identifying a decline in predefined neuropsychological measures sensitive to ECT-induced cognitive changes: verbal recall and verbal fluency.

Methods: Mean MMSE scores before and 1 week after ECT were compared using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. The Reliable Change Index was calculated for all cognitive measures to indicate whether a participant's change in score from pre- to post-ECT was considered statistically significant. The sensitivity and specificity of the MMSE were calculated.

Results: A total of 426 patients with depression from 5 sites were included from the Dutch ECT Consortium. Mean (SD) MMSE score increased significantly from 26.2 (3.9) before ECT to 26.8 (3.8) after ECT (p = .002). After ECT, 36 patients (8.5%) showed a significant decline in MMSE score. The sensitivity of the MMSE in identifying patients who experienced a significant decline in verbal recall or verbal fluency ranged from 3.6% to 11.1%. The specificity of the MMSE in identifying patients who did not experience a significant decline in verbal recall or verbal fluency ranged from 95.6% to 96.6%.

Conclusions: Given the very low sensitivity of the MMSE, we propose reconsidering the prominence of the MMSE in ECT practice and cognitive monitoring guidelines, advocating for a more comprehensive approach to assess ECT-induced cognitive changes.

小型精神状态检查对检测电休克疗法引起的客观认知副作用的敏感性,荷兰电休克疗法联合会的研究结果。
背景:监测电休克疗法(ECT)后的认知副作用对于平衡副作用和临床疗效至关重要。遗憾的是,目前还缺乏有关电休克疗法后认知测试的循证指南。全球 ECT 实践中经常使用的测试是迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)。我们研究了 MMSE 的变化及其在识别对 ECT 引起的认知变化敏感的预定义神经心理学指标(言语回忆和言语流畅性)下降方面的表现:采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较ECT前和ECT后一周的MMSE平均得分。计算所有认知指标的可靠变化指数,以表明个人从治疗前到治疗后的得分变化是否具有统计学意义。计算了 MMSE 的敏感性和特异性:结果:荷兰 ECT 联合会共纳入了来自五个地点的 426 名抑郁症患者。MMSE的平均值从ECT前的26.2(SD=3.9)显著增加到ECT后的26.8(SD=3.8)(P=0.002)。36名患者(8.5%)在ECT后的MMSE评分明显下降。MMSE 在识别言语回忆或言语流利性显著下降的患者方面的灵敏度为 3.6% 至 11.1%。MMSE在识别言语回忆能力或言语流畅性未显著下降的患者方面的特异性为95.6%至96.6%:鉴于MMSE的灵敏度非常低,我们建议重新考虑MMSE在ECT实践和认知监测指南中的重要性,提倡采用更全面的方法来评估ECT引起的认知变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信