Alberto Stefana, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Eduard Vieta, Eric A Youngstrom
{"title":"Therapeutic relationship elements and therapy session outcomes: Protocol for a longitudinal study of the patient's perspective.","authors":"Alberto Stefana, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Eduard Vieta, Eric A Youngstrom","doi":"10.12688/openreseurope.16466.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a growing recognition of the key role of the therapeutic relationship in the outcomes of psychotherapy. However, current understanding of its specific components, their interplay and related patient-therapist dynamics is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>(a) To validate two self-report measures to assess subjective affective reactions of patients toward their psychotherapists during specific therapy sessions, and (b) to explore the relationships and dynamics among four elements of the therapeutic relationship: patient reactions toward the therapist, working alliance, alliance ruptures and repairs, and the real relationship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study uses a nonrandomized, two-time point longitudinal design. The target population is adult patients currently engaged in individual psychotherapy for heterogeneous mental conditions. Participants are recruited through two online recruitment platforms: Research for Me and ResearchMatch. Data collection involves administering two surveys through the Qualtrics online survey platform. The baseline survey assesses information about the most recent therapy session and the preceding week, while the follow-up survey collects data on the subsequent therapy session and the days leading up to it.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This research offers three main contributions: (a) it furthers evidence-based assessment in psychotherapy by creating and validating two novel, succinct self-report tools; (b) it enhances theoretical understanding within therapeutic relationship research by exploring the significant impact of patients' perceptions of relationship elements on session outcomes variability; and (c) it will identify therapeutic relationship elements that can either enhance or hinder the overall relationship quality and session outcomes.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The results will be published in indexed peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant psychology and psychiatry conferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":74359,"journal":{"name":"Open research Europe","volume":"3 ","pages":"133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11310652/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open research Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.16466.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: There is a growing recognition of the key role of the therapeutic relationship in the outcomes of psychotherapy. However, current understanding of its specific components, their interplay and related patient-therapist dynamics is limited.
Objective: (a) To validate two self-report measures to assess subjective affective reactions of patients toward their psychotherapists during specific therapy sessions, and (b) to explore the relationships and dynamics among four elements of the therapeutic relationship: patient reactions toward the therapist, working alliance, alliance ruptures and repairs, and the real relationship.
Methods: This study uses a nonrandomized, two-time point longitudinal design. The target population is adult patients currently engaged in individual psychotherapy for heterogeneous mental conditions. Participants are recruited through two online recruitment platforms: Research for Me and ResearchMatch. Data collection involves administering two surveys through the Qualtrics online survey platform. The baseline survey assesses information about the most recent therapy session and the preceding week, while the follow-up survey collects data on the subsequent therapy session and the days leading up to it.
Discussion: This research offers three main contributions: (a) it furthers evidence-based assessment in psychotherapy by creating and validating two novel, succinct self-report tools; (b) it enhances theoretical understanding within therapeutic relationship research by exploring the significant impact of patients' perceptions of relationship elements on session outcomes variability; and (c) it will identify therapeutic relationship elements that can either enhance or hinder the overall relationship quality and session outcomes.
Ethics and dissemination: The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The results will be published in indexed peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant psychology and psychiatry conferences.
背景:越来越多的人认识到治疗关系在心理治疗结果中的关键作用。目的:(a)验证两种自我报告测量方法,以评估患者在特定治疗过程中对心理治疗师的主观情感反应;(b)探索治疗关系四个要素之间的关系和动态变化:患者对治疗师的反应、工作联盟、联盟破裂和修复以及真实关系:本研究采用非随机、双时间点纵向设计。研究对象是目前正在接受个体心理治疗的成年患者,他们的精神状况各不相同。参与者通过两个在线招募平台招募:Research for Me 和 ResearchMatch。数据收集包括通过 Qualtrics 在线调查平台进行两项调查。基线调查评估最近一次治疗及之前一周的信息,而后续调查则收集随后一次治疗及之前几天的数据:本研究有三大贡献:(a)通过创建和验证两种新颖、简洁的自我报告工具,促进了心理治疗中的循证评估;(b)通过探索患者对治疗关系要素的认知对疗程结果可变性的重要影响,加强了治疗关系研究中的理论理解;(c)将确定可提高或阻碍整体关系质量和疗程结果的治疗关系要素:研究方案已获得北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校机构审查委员会的批准。研究结果将发表在有索引的同行评审期刊上,并在相关的心理学和精神病学会议上发表。