Microsurgical Repair of Ventral Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: Efficacy and Safety of Patch-Sealing Versus Suturing.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Operative Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1227/ons.0000000000001310
Thomas Petutschnigg, Levin Häni, Johannes Goldberg, Tomas Dobrocky, Eike I Piechowiak, Andreas Raabe, C Marvin Jesse, Ralph T Schär
{"title":"Microsurgical Repair of Ventral Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: Efficacy and Safety of Patch-Sealing Versus Suturing.","authors":"Thomas Petutschnigg, Levin Häni, Johannes Goldberg, Tomas Dobrocky, Eike I Piechowiak, Andreas Raabe, C Marvin Jesse, Ralph T Schär","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>In patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH), microsurgical repair is recommended in Type 1 (ventral) dural leaks, when conservative measures fail. However, there is lacking consensus on the optimal surgical technique for permanent and safe closure of ventral leaks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of surgically treated SIH patients with Type 1 leaks at our institution between 2013 and 2023. Patients were analyzed according to the type of surgical technique: (1) Microsurgical suture vs (2) extradural and intradural patching (sealing technique). End points were resolution of spinal longitudinal epidural cerebrospinal fluid collection (SLEC), change in brain SIH-Score (Bern-Score), headache resolution after 3 months, surgery time, complications, and reoperation rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 85 (66% women) patients with consecutive SIH (mean age 47 ± 11 years) underwent transdural microsurgical repair. The leak was sutured in 53 (62%) patients (suture group) and patch-sealed in 32 (38%) patients (sealing group). We found no significant difference in the rates of residual SLEC and resolution of headache between suture and sealing groups (13% vs 22%, P = .238 and 89% vs 94%, P = .508). No changes were found in the postoperative Bern-Score between suture and sealing groups (1.4 [±1.6] vs 1.7 [±2.1] P = 1). Mean surgery time was significantly shorter in the sealing group than in the suture group (139 ± 48 vs 169 ± 51 minutes; P = .007). Ten patients of the suture and 3 of the sealing group had a complication (23% vs 9%, P = .212), whereas 6 patients of the suture and 2 patients of the sealing group required reoperation (11% vs 6%, P = .438).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Microsurgical suturing and patch-sealing of ventral dural leaks in patients with SIH are equally effective. Sealing alone is a significantly faster technique, requiring less spinal cord manipulation and may therefore minimize the risk of surgical complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":54254,"journal":{"name":"Operative Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"379-385"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809960/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001310","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: In patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH), microsurgical repair is recommended in Type 1 (ventral) dural leaks, when conservative measures fail. However, there is lacking consensus on the optimal surgical technique for permanent and safe closure of ventral leaks.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of surgically treated SIH patients with Type 1 leaks at our institution between 2013 and 2023. Patients were analyzed according to the type of surgical technique: (1) Microsurgical suture vs (2) extradural and intradural patching (sealing technique). End points were resolution of spinal longitudinal epidural cerebrospinal fluid collection (SLEC), change in brain SIH-Score (Bern-Score), headache resolution after 3 months, surgery time, complications, and reoperation rates.

Results: In total, 85 (66% women) patients with consecutive SIH (mean age 47 ± 11 years) underwent transdural microsurgical repair. The leak was sutured in 53 (62%) patients (suture group) and patch-sealed in 32 (38%) patients (sealing group). We found no significant difference in the rates of residual SLEC and resolution of headache between suture and sealing groups (13% vs 22%, P = .238 and 89% vs 94%, P = .508). No changes were found in the postoperative Bern-Score between suture and sealing groups (1.4 [±1.6] vs 1.7 [±2.1] P = 1). Mean surgery time was significantly shorter in the sealing group than in the suture group (139 ± 48 vs 169 ± 51 minutes; P = .007). Ten patients of the suture and 3 of the sealing group had a complication (23% vs 9%, P = .212), whereas 6 patients of the suture and 2 patients of the sealing group required reoperation (11% vs 6%, P = .438).

Conclusion: Microsurgical suturing and patch-sealing of ventral dural leaks in patients with SIH are equally effective. Sealing alone is a significantly faster technique, requiring less spinal cord manipulation and may therefore minimize the risk of surgical complications.

自发性颅内低血压患者腹腔脑脊液漏的显微外科修补术:贴片缝合与缝合的有效性和安全性。
背景和目的:对于自发性颅内低血压(SIH)患者,如果保守治疗无效,建议对 1 型(腹侧)硬脑膜渗漏进行显微手术修补。然而,对于永久性安全闭合腹侧漏的最佳手术技术,目前尚未达成共识:我们对 2013 年至 2023 年在本院接受手术治疗的 1 型 SIH 漏孔患者进行了回顾性分析。根据手术技术类型对患者进行分析:(1) 显微外科缝合术 vs (2) 硬膜外和硬膜内修补术(密封技术)。终点为脊髓纵向硬膜外脑脊液聚集(SLEC)的缓解、脑SIH-Score(Bern-Score)的变化、3个月后头痛的缓解、手术时间、并发症和再次手术率:共有 85 名连续性 SIH 患者(66% 为女性)(平均年龄为 47 ± 11 岁)接受了经硬膜显微外科修补术。53例(62%)患者(缝合组)进行了漏孔缝合,32例(38%)患者(密封组)进行了补片密封。我们发现,缝合组和密封组的 SLEC 残留率和头痛缓解率没有明显差异(13% 对 22%,P = .238 和 89% 对 94%,P = .508)。缝合组和密封组的术后 Bern-Score 评分没有变化(1.4 [±1.6] vs 1.7 [±2.1] P = 1)。缝合组的平均手术时间明显短于缝合组(139±48 分钟 vs 169±51 分钟;P = .007)。缝合组有 10 名患者出现并发症,密封组有 3 名患者出现并发症(23% vs 9%,P = .212),而缝合组有 6 名患者需要再次手术,密封组有 2 名患者需要再次手术(11% vs 6%,P = .438):结论:对 SIH 患者腹侧硬膜渗漏进行显微外科缝合和补片缝合同样有效。结论:在 SIH 患者中,显微外科缝合术和硬脊膜腹侧渗漏补片缝合术同样有效。单独缝合是一种明显更快的技术,需要的脊髓操作更少,因此可将手术并发症的风险降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Operative Neurosurgery
Operative Neurosurgery Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.00%
发文量
530
期刊介绍: Operative Neurosurgery is a bi-monthly, unique publication focusing exclusively on surgical technique and devices, providing practical, skill-enhancing guidance to its readers. Complementing the clinical and research studies published in Neurosurgery, Operative Neurosurgery brings the reader technical material that highlights operative procedures, anatomy, instrumentation, devices, and technology. Operative Neurosurgery is the practical resource for cutting-edge material that brings the surgeon the most up to date literature on operative practice and technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信