Early detection of altered cold perception in elderly with type 2 diabetes using a novel Quantitative Sensory Testing method

IF 4.3 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
{"title":"Early detection of altered cold perception in elderly with type 2 diabetes using a novel Quantitative Sensory Testing method","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.dsx.2024.103097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To compare the effectiveness of two methods for measuring cold detection thresholds in screening for temperature-perception deficits in elderly individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2 diabetes).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cold threshold measurements were performed on seven body regions of participants with diabetes without neuropathy (n = 30; mean age, 70.9 ± 6.5 years) and healthy participants (n = 73; mean age, 68 ± 5 years). Two protocols applying the Levels Method were used: the first used skin temperature as the starting point; the second used 40 °C.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Cold detection thresholds were significantly higher in subjects with diabetes, particularly on the foot. For CDT TSk, values were −2.22 ± 1.91 °C in non-diabetic and −3.27 ± 3.33 °C in diabetic groups (p = 0.023); for CDT 40, values were −9.82 ± 3.5 °C and −12.18 ± 4.5 °C (p = 0.003). However, after adjusting for age, the group effect on cold threshold with skin temperature as baseline disappeared. Sensory screens showed that the Area Under Curve of the method using a 40 °C baseline was 0.69 (p = 0.002).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Measuring the cold detection threshold on the foot with a 40 °C baseline is more effective than using skin temperature as a baseline for screening sensory alterations in elderly subjects with type 2 diabetes before neuropathy onset.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>These findings highlight the importance of selecting the appropriate cold detection threshold method for elderly individuals with type 2 diabetes. The optimal method can facilitate early identification of sensory changes, minimizing complications and improving overall well-being.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48252,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871402124001589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To compare the effectiveness of two methods for measuring cold detection thresholds in screening for temperature-perception deficits in elderly individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2 diabetes).

Methods

Cold threshold measurements were performed on seven body regions of participants with diabetes without neuropathy (n = 30; mean age, 70.9 ± 6.5 years) and healthy participants (n = 73; mean age, 68 ± 5 years). Two protocols applying the Levels Method were used: the first used skin temperature as the starting point; the second used 40 °C.

Results

Cold detection thresholds were significantly higher in subjects with diabetes, particularly on the foot. For CDT TSk, values were −2.22 ± 1.91 °C in non-diabetic and −3.27 ± 3.33 °C in diabetic groups (p = 0.023); for CDT 40, values were −9.82 ± 3.5 °C and −12.18 ± 4.5 °C (p = 0.003). However, after adjusting for age, the group effect on cold threshold with skin temperature as baseline disappeared. Sensory screens showed that the Area Under Curve of the method using a 40 °C baseline was 0.69 (p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Measuring the cold detection threshold on the foot with a 40 °C baseline is more effective than using skin temperature as a baseline for screening sensory alterations in elderly subjects with type 2 diabetes before neuropathy onset.

Significance

These findings highlight the importance of selecting the appropriate cold detection threshold method for elderly individuals with type 2 diabetes. The optimal method can facilitate early identification of sensory changes, minimizing complications and improving overall well-being.

利用新型定量感官测试方法及早发现患有 2 型糖尿病的老年人对寒冷感知的改变。
目的:比较两种测量冷阈值的方法在筛查老年 2 型糖尿病(T2 型糖尿病)患者温度感知障碍方面的有效性:对无神经病变的糖尿病患者(n = 30;平均年龄为 70.9 ± 6.5 岁)和健康患者(n = 73;平均年龄为 68 ± 5 岁)的七个身体区域进行冷阈值测量。采用了两种应用水平法的方案:第一种方案以皮肤温度为起点;第二种方案以 40 °C 为起点:结果:糖尿病患者的冷检测阈值明显较高,尤其是脚部。对于 CDT TSk,非糖尿病组的值为 -2.22 ± 1.91 °C,糖尿病组为 -3.27 ± 3.33 °C(p = 0.023);对于 CDT 40,非糖尿病组的值为 -9.82 ± 3.5 °C,糖尿病组为 -12.18 ± 4.5 °C(p = 0.003)。然而,在对年龄进行调整后,以皮肤温度为基线的冷阈值的群体效应消失了。感官屏幕显示,以 40 °C 为基线的方法的曲线下面积为 0.69(p = 0.002):结论:以 40 °C为基线测量足部冷检测阈值比以皮肤温度为基线在神经病变发生前筛查老年 2 型糖尿病患者的感觉改变更有效:这些发现强调了为老年 2 型糖尿病患者选择合适的低温检测阈值方法的重要性。最佳方法有助于早期识别感觉变化,最大限度地减少并发症,改善整体健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews is the official journal of DiabetesIndia. It aims to provide a global platform for healthcare professionals, diabetes educators, and other stakeholders to submit their research on diabetes care. Types of Publications: Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews publishes peer-reviewed original articles, reviews, short communications, case reports, letters to the Editor, and expert comments. Reviews and mini-reviews are particularly welcomed for areas within endocrinology undergoing rapid changes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信